Taiwan's plan to hold a referendum is a big step forward on the path of democracy. But China and its collaborators in Taiwan are annoyed by the referendum. One says Taiwan is pursuing independence in the name of democracy and threatens to use military force. The other says President Chen Shui-bian (
Chen has made public the two referendum questions, which have drawn a positive response from the US. But I believe China will not give up since it has always opposed Taiwan's democratization in the name of the unification-independence issue. From Taiwan's first presidential election in 1996 to the first transfer of political power in 2000 to now, China has made an all-out effort to suppress Taiwan's democracy.
As I write this article, the Chinese government has not responded to the two referendum questions. But Chinese scholars have said that what concerns Beijing the most is that Taiwan will hold a referendum, not the referendum topics. This is in line with the facts.
Therefore, even if the people of Taiwan support unification with China, Beijing still tries to forbid people from exercising their basic rights through a popular referendum.
The US is the leader of the world's democratic countries and its concern for peace and stability in the Taiwan Strait is understandable. But China is an autocratic empire. It has no right to and is not qualified to criticize Taiwan's democracy. It knows nothing about democracy and is an enemy of democracy.
In July last year, the Hong Kong Special Administrative Region government's forceful push for legislation based on Article 23 of the Basic Law (
In the District Council elections in November, Hong Kong residents once again expressed their demand for democracy with votes. On Jan. 1, 100,000 people took to the streets.
Beijing has tried to turn its back on the demands of the people. Recently four hack scholars of Beijing, dubbed the "four great defenders of the law" (
The US and the UK have heard the Hong Kong people's wishes and expressed their support. The US Consul General in Hong Kong, James Keith, said history has repeatedly proved that the best policy in response to the people's wishes is to hold general elections.
To suppress Taiwan's democracy, China cozies up to the US. But it adopts a totally different attitude toward the US in dealing with the Hong Kong problem. This is because Hong Kong is under China's control, so China can do whatever it wants. Taiwan, on the other hand, is not under China's control, and therefore the US' help is needed.
If Taiwan is ever controlled by China, there will be no room for the US to interfere in Beijing's "internal affairs" and Taiwan's democracy will undoubtedly come to an end.
A pro-China institution in Hong Kong recently invited two of the "four great defenders of the law" to speak at a seminar. One harshly condemned the Hong Kong residents' demand to "give political power to the people." He said that the Hong Kong government gave political power to the people in 1997, and asked if the people of Hong Kong wanted all six million people to be chief executives.
This is either a foolish comment or a defamation of democracy. Obviously, the US can use China in its war against terrorism, but it must never let China interfere in others' affairs. Otherwise, disaster will ensue.
Paul Lin is a commentator based in New York.
Translated by Jackie Lin
President William Lai (賴清德) attended a dinner held by the American Israel Public Affairs Committee (AIPAC) when representatives from the group visited Taiwan in October. In a speech at the event, Lai highlighted similarities in the geopolitical challenges faced by Israel and Taiwan, saying that the two countries “stand on the front line against authoritarianism.” Lai noted how Taiwan had “immediately condemned” the Oct. 7, 2023, attack on Israel by Hamas and had provided humanitarian aid. Lai was heavily criticized from some quarters for standing with AIPAC and Israel. On Nov. 4, the Taipei Times published an opinion article (“Speak out on the
The image was oddly quiet. No speeches, no flags, no dramatic announcements — just a Chinese cargo ship cutting through arctic ice and arriving in Britain in October. The Istanbul Bridge completed a journey that once existed only in theory, shaving weeks off traditional shipping routes. On paper, it was a story about efficiency. In strategic terms, it was about timing. Much like politics, arriving early matters. Especially when the route, the rules and the traffic are still undefined. For years, global politics has trained us to watch the loud moments: warships in the Taiwan Strait, sanctions announced at news conferences, leaders trading
Eighty-seven percent of Taiwan’s energy supply this year came from burning fossil fuels, with more than 47 percent of that from gas-fired power generation. The figures attracted international attention since they were in October published in a Reuters report, which highlighted the fragility and structural challenges of Taiwan’s energy sector, accumulated through long-standing policy choices. The nation’s overreliance on natural gas is proving unstable and inadequate. The rising use of natural gas does not project an image of a Taiwan committed to a green energy transition; rather, it seems that Taiwan is attempting to patch up structural gaps in lieu of
News about expanding security cooperation between Israel and Taiwan, including the visits of Deputy Minister of National Defense Po Horng-huei (柏鴻輝) in September and Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu (吳志中) this month, as well as growing ties in areas such as missile defense and cybersecurity, should not be viewed as isolated events. The emphasis on missile defense, including Taiwan’s newly introduced T-Dome project, is simply the most visible sign of a deeper trend that has been taking shape quietly over the past two to three years. Taipei is seeking to expand security and defense cooperation with Israel, something officials
RSS