To counteract the Democratic Progressive Party's accusations that the opposition's threatened boycott of the March 20 referendum is really an objection to Taiwan's democratic consolidation, the pan-blue camp has changed its position from "not opposing the referendum" to "questioning the legality and necessity of President Chen Shui-bian's (
Led by Taipei Mayor Ma Ying-jeou (
Article 17 of the Referendum Law (
In this regard, whether the handling of the referendum meets the criteria set by the article is up to the president's political judgment. The voters will have the final say about it.
The opposition's claim that Chen has violated the Referendum Law is by no means logical. Moreover, to portray Chen's move as an attempt to abuse Article 17 is also without legitimate grounds. Remember, it was the opposition, which dominates the Legislative Yuan, that passed the Law.
The Chen administration has repeatedly reminded Taiwanese people and the international community of the inherent danger of China's missile deployment and military expansion. This is a fact not only faced by Taiwan but also widely recognized by others, including the US.
The main concern from the pan-blue camp centers on the extent to which the threat has become "a clear and present danger" that meets the criteria for holding a defensive referendum. While Ma and his colleagues argue that the country has been under military threat from China for half a century but has never been in a state of emergency, they overlook that fact that there was no legal basis for holding a referendum in the past.
Taiwan simply cannot wait until external threats become imminent. Therefore, the pan-blue camp's ignorance of China's military threat displays a huge lack of responsibility.
When it comes to the second condition -- whether national sovereignty is under threat -- the pan-blue camp should take more responsibility for failing to deter China's international saber-rattling on Taiwan's statehood.
The KMT's long-term adherence to its "one China" fantasy has resulted in the Republic of China's (ROC) exclusion from the UN and other key international organizations. When the world community confused the ROC with the People's Republic of China and gradually started to treat Taiwan as part of China, shouldn't we have been worried about Taiwan's sovereignty being sabotaged?
In the face of Taiwanese leaders' push for a democratic referendum, Beijing has incorporated a new strategy of uniting its allies to isolate the Chen administration. What are they aiming for?
Can't anyone from the pan-blue camp see the scheme in the Chinese leaders' minds? Beijing's strategy is to create an international image that Taiwan' affairs are China's internal affairs.
To show a firm determination to safeguard Taiwan's national interests, Lien and the pan-blue camp owe the voters a fair explanation of why they intend to block the March referendum.
The central bank and the US Department of the Treasury on Friday issued a joint statement that both sides agreed to avoid currency manipulation and the use of exchange rates to gain a competitive advantage, and would only intervene in foreign-exchange markets to combat excess volatility and disorderly movements. The central bank also agreed to disclose its foreign-exchange intervention amounts quarterly rather than every six months, starting from next month. It emphasized that the joint statement is unrelated to tariff negotiations between Taipei and Washington, and that the US never requested the appreciation of the New Taiwan dollar during the
Since leaving office last year, former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) has been journeying across continents. Her ability to connect with international audiences and foster goodwill toward her country continues to enhance understanding of Taiwan. It is possible because she can now walk through doors in Europe that are closed to President William Lai (賴清德). Tsai last week gave a speech at the Berlin Freedom Conference, where, standing in front of civil society leaders, human rights advocates and political and business figures, she highlighted Taiwan’s indispensable global role and shared its experience as a model for democratic resilience against cognitive warfare and
The diplomatic dispute between China and Japan over Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s comments in the Japanese Diet continues to escalate. In a letter to UN Secretary-General Antonio Guterres, China’s UN Ambassador Fu Cong (傅聰) wrote that, “if Japan dares to attempt an armed intervention in the cross-Strait situation, it would be an act of aggression.” There was no indication that Fu was aware of the irony implicit in the complaint. Until this point, Beijing had limited its remonstrations to diplomatic summonses and weaponization of economic levers, such as banning Japanese seafood imports, discouraging Chinese from traveling to Japan or issuing
The diplomatic spat between China and Japan over comments Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi made on Nov. 7 continues to worsen. Beijing is angry about Takaichi’s remarks that military force used against Taiwan by the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could constitute a “survival-threatening situation” necessitating the involvement of the Japanese Self-Defense Forces. Rather than trying to reduce tensions, Beijing is looking to leverage the situation to its advantage in action and rhetoric. On Saturday last week, four armed China Coast Guard vessels sailed around the Japanese-controlled Diaoyutai Islands (釣魚台), known to Japan as the Senkakus. On Friday, in what