An independent country, especially a democratic one, has the right to hold referendums to decide major national policies. This is not only a right but a duty -- a "universal value" recognized by the people of the world, especially those of the world's democratic nations.
Therefore, it is the most basic democratic right of the Taiwanese people to hold a "defensive referendum." No other countries, including China, Japan or the US, have a greater say on the matter. But China is using every possible means to shrink Taiwan's international space, pressuring Japan, the US and other European countries by claiming that President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) is promoting Taiwan's independence and changing the status quo in the Taiwan Strait. As a result, Japan, the US and most recently France have expressed their concern to Taiwan, and have even opposed Taiwan holding a referendum in March.
These developments are in fact part of the normal operation of international politics. Each country's attitude has complex dimensions and can be interpreted differently. This is not something worthy of panic. From Taiwan's perspective, Chen has his views on how to rule the nation, as well as to what degree Taiwan should resist pressure from China, Japan and the US. All of this is open to public scrutiny.
But in view of China's behavior, if a nation were a normal and independent sovereign state, its people would unite to resist China's hegemonic bent and protest against the interference of Japan, the US and other countries in its domestic affairs.
Unfortunately, Taiwan is an abnormal country. Chen and Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Lien Chan (
Remember the absurd moment when Lien compared Chen to Osama bin Laden, the guru of international terrorism? Chen is holding a defensive referendum, and claims that the presidential election is in fact "a sacred battle between the Taiwanese people and the Chinese Communist Party." This statement was absolutely legitimate. But Lien seems to believe that Chen's "sacred battle" statement was in the same vein as bin Laden's terrorism agenda, and said that the president could go right ahead if he wanted to die, and that he wasn't interested in going to war alongside the president.
Chen is holding a preventive referendum to demand China cease threatening Taiwan with its ballistic missiles. China is in fact the real al-Qaeda, and Chinese President Hu Jintao (
These remarks were not only stunning in their shamelessness but also frightening to many Taiwanese people. With an opposition presidential candidate blathering on in this capitulationist vein, does Taiwan really need China for an enemy?
People First Party (PFP) Chair-man James Soong (宋楚瑜) has also been a champion of capitulationism. He is both unwilling and unable to maintain Taiwan's sovereignty, and is singing the nation's demise. He recently mimicked and even exaggerated the concerns of Japan, the US and other countries. Not only did he lobby the blue camp to prevent the launch of referendums on the Fourth Nuclear Power Plant and other issues at the Legislative Yuan, and called on Chen to give up his defensive referendum, he also claimed that "no nation in the world can afford to irritate China." His remarks were stunning and frightening. I can't help but wonder whether Soong is running for the vice presidency of China.
Irritate China? Taiwan's efforts to maintain its sovereignty over the past 50 years have irritated China. The US' "three communiques" based on its "one-China" policy and the Taiwan Relations Act have irritated China. Washington letting Chen and Vice President Annette Lu (
The European Parliament passed a resolution recently demanding Beijing not wage war across the Strait and withdraw its missiles; this irritated China. India's development of nuclear weapons has irritated China. Former Japanese prime minister Yoshiro Mori visited Taiwan last month and irritated China. It must be a sign of the apocalypse if all these democratic countries dare irritate China.
In a word, both Lien and Soong have divested themselves of any dignity. They dare not support the international status of the nation. Will Taiwan remain a democratic and independent sovereignty in the future if this pair is elected? I really don't think so.
Hopefully, the Taiwanese people can see through this on March 20. They must use their ballots to recognize and maintain the sovereignty of Taiwan.
Chiou Chwei-liang is a visiting professor at the Graduate Institute of Southeast Asian Studies, Tamkang University.
TRANSLATED BY EDDY CHANG
US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) were born under the sign of Gemini. Geminis are known for their intelligence, creativity, adaptability and flexibility. It is unlikely, then, that the trade conflict between the US and China would escalate into a catastrophic collision. It is more probable that both sides would seek a way to de-escalate, paving the way for a Trump-Xi summit that allows the global economy some breathing room. Practically speaking, China and the US have vulnerabilities, and a prolonged trade war would be damaging for both. In the US, the electoral system means that public opinion
In their recent op-ed “Trump Should Rein In Taiwan” in Foreign Policy magazine, Christopher Chivvis and Stephen Wertheim argued that the US should pressure President William Lai (賴清德) to “tone it down” to de-escalate tensions in the Taiwan Strait — as if Taiwan’s words are more of a threat to peace than Beijing’s actions. It is an old argument dressed up in new concern: that Washington must rein in Taipei to avoid war. However, this narrative gets it backward. Taiwan is not the problem; China is. Calls for a so-called “grand bargain” with Beijing — where the US pressures Taiwan into concessions
The term “assassin’s mace” originates from Chinese folklore, describing a concealed weapon used by a weaker hero to defeat a stronger adversary with an unexpected strike. In more general military parlance, the concept refers to an asymmetric capability that targets a critical vulnerability of an adversary. China has found its modern equivalent of the assassin’s mace with its high-altitude electromagnetic pulse (HEMP) weapons, which are nuclear warheads detonated at a high altitude, emitting intense electromagnetic radiation capable of disabling and destroying electronics. An assassin’s mace weapon possesses two essential characteristics: strategic surprise and the ability to neutralize a core dependency.
Chinese President and Chinese Communist Party (CCP) Chairman Xi Jinping (習近平) said in a politburo speech late last month that his party must protect the “bottom line” to prevent systemic threats. The tone of his address was grave, revealing deep anxieties about China’s current state of affairs. Essentially, what he worries most about is systemic threats to China’s normal development as a country. The US-China trade war has turned white hot: China’s export orders have plummeted, Chinese firms and enterprises are shutting up shop, and local debt risks are mounting daily, causing China’s economy to flag externally and hemorrhage internally. China’s
RSS