On Wednesday, less than three weeks before the Lunar New Year holiday, Pu Zhaozhou (
Pu suggested an arrangement under which flights would travel without stopping in cities such as Hong Kong and Macau -- but only in one direction -- from Taipei to a handful of cities in China.
According to Pu, this proposal comes with the condition that next year the charter flights will fly direct in both directions.
Anyone who has been paying attention to the cross-strait deadlock over direct links can see that this offer is riddled with many tricks. The deadlock has come about because China insists on Taiwan's acceptance of the "one China" principle as a condition of any official cross-strait talks on direct links.
The alternative would be to skip official negotiations between the governments, and leave talks in the hands of authorized private groups. The latter option is no different from the former because by skipping formal negotiations between governments, Taiwan would be conceding that cross-strait direct links are domestic links and that Taiwan is merely a "province" of "one China."
After all, no international air links can be launched without involving the governments in question, because doing so would mean flying into foreign territories without authorization and violating sovereignty.
The arrangement under which cross-strait charter flights were made last year did not have these problems. Not only were the flights one-way -- Taipei to Shanghai, which incurred virtually no security risk for Taiwan -- but even more importantly, while there were no changes of aircraft between Taipei and Shanghai, the planes were still required to make stops in places such as Hong Kong and Macao.
So long as flights remained indirect, there was no sovereignty issue involved, and skipping government negotiation was possible.
The proposal made by Beijing this year asks for "direct flights" from Taipei to several Chinese cities without any stopovers. This is something that would require negotiations between governments.
Obviously, if Taiwan accepts one-way direct flights without negotiations this year, then it will have no reason to demand negotiations over two-way direct flights next year.
Bluntly put, this is simply Beijing's way of trying to trick Taiwan into direct links under the "one China" principle.
This seeming "concession" offered by Beijing is no concession at all.
Statements made by Zhang Mingqing (
Zhang on the one hand harshly criticized President Chen Shui-bian's (
Obviously, after the arrests of Taiwanese businessmen on espionage charges recently, Beijing has decided to take steps to ease the fears of the Taiwanese business community.
This new proposal on chartered flights -- unlikely to become reality -- is simply another one of Beijing's gestures to make amends.
Taiwan stands at the epicenter of a seismic shift that will determine the Indo-Pacific’s future security architecture. Whether deterrence prevails or collapses will reverberate far beyond the Taiwan Strait, fundamentally reshaping global power dynamics. The stakes could not be higher. Today, Taipei confronts an unprecedented convergence of threats from an increasingly muscular China that has intensified its multidimensional pressure campaign. Beijing’s strategy is comprehensive: military intimidation, diplomatic isolation, economic coercion, and sophisticated influence operations designed to fracture Taiwan’s democratic society from within. This challenge is magnified by Taiwan’s internal political divisions, which extend to fundamental questions about the island’s identity and future
The narrative surrounding Indian Prime Minister Narendra Modi’s attendance at last week’s Shanghai Cooperation Organization (SCO) summit — where he held hands with Russian President Vladimir Putin and chatted amiably with Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) — was widely framed as a signal of Modi distancing himself from the US and edging closer to regional autocrats. It was depicted as Modi reacting to the levying of high US tariffs, burying the hatchet over border disputes with China, and heralding less engagement with the Quadrilateral Security dialogue (Quad) composed of the US, India, Japan and Australia. With Modi in China for the
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) has postponed its chairperson candidate registration for two weeks, and so far, nine people have announced their intention to run for chairperson, the most on record, with more expected to announce their campaign in the final days. On the evening of Aug. 23, shortly after seven KMT lawmakers survived recall votes, KMT Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) announced he would step down and urged Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) to step in and lead the party back to power. Lu immediately ruled herself out the following day, leaving the subject in question. In the days that followed, several
The Jamestown Foundation last week published an article exposing Beijing’s oil rigs and other potential dual-use platforms in waters near Pratas Island (Dongsha Island, 東沙島). China’s activities there resembled what they did in the East China Sea, inside the exclusive economic zones of Japan and South Korea, as well as with other South China Sea claimants. However, the most surprising element of the report was that the authors’ government contacts and Jamestown’s own evinced little awareness of China’s activities. That Beijing’s testing of Taiwanese (and its allies) situational awareness seemingly went unnoticed strongly suggests the need for more intelligence. Taiwan’s naval
RSS