Taiwan's drought is getting more serious. Apart from inconveniencing people in their daily lives, it is leading to the hoarding of water, the non-cultivation of land, work stoppages, unemployment and compensation payouts.
As the drought continues to create these problems, some social organizations are quietly initiating a river protection movement. Yuchih township (
Tatung Township in Ilan County has declared that it will protect the Sungluo, Chiuliao and Sichung rivers, all of which run through its area of jurisdiction. These rivers are important tributaries to the upper reaches of the Lanyang River, providing the Lanyang Plain with water for irrigation and household use.
The drought and the river protection movement might appear to be two distinct phenomena, but, as far as the protection of water resources is concerned, they are actually closely related. As Taiwan faces the difficulties brought about by an unprecedented water short-age, the river protection movements are exceptionally valuable.
Even though the river protection movement is largely voluntary, the strong, cohesive power of communities helps to spread popular sympathy for the concept of water conservation, both in theory and in practice. Also, most of the protected rivers are located in forest water catchment areas, where the effects of water resource replenishment are even more obvious. The river protection movement faces serious challenges, however, in terms of human and material resources.
As far as human resources are concerned, although local people are enthusiastic about protecting rivers and ecology, they often remain at a loss when it comes to future development. Without expert advice, communities don't know what the next step should be or how they should go about protecting the rivers. This often becomes a major worry for them.
As for material resources, since the river protection movement was started by non-governmental organizations, it relies mainly on local community assistance and voluntary contributions. Arranging activities and patrols requires a lot of resources and the financial situation becomes tight over time.
In light of all this, I would urge that, first of all, research institutions under government agencies direct the community river protection movement. Many research institutions, such as the Taiwan Endemic Species Research Institute (行政院農業委員會特有生物研究保育中心), the Taiwan Agricultural Research Institute (農業試驗所) and the Taiwan Forestry Re-search Institute (林業試驗所), already have a solid foundation in academic theory. The assistance of their expert teams would be beneficial to the river protection movement. It would also amount to an indirect form of implementation of the government's preservation policies.
Next, administrative agencies should subsidize the community river protection movement. The government often develops subsidy plans to assist communities in their activities. Apart from considering the contents of a plan when approving applications, the agencies in charge could be asked to consider additional benefits -- such as, in the case of the river protection movement, water resource preservation. Even though these subsidies would not be substantial, they would represent recognition of and support for the river protection movement.
Following the successful protection of the Tanayiku and Nantzuhsien rivers, protection movements are being initiated nationwide, a force that is gradually growing stronger. In particular, as the drought problem gets more serious by the day, we should place greater value on environmentally friendly, upriver water reservoirs. River protection movements would then present an excellent opportunity.
The government should grasp the opportunities offered by these popular movements and take the lead by gently guiding them, with the assistance of expert teams and financial aid for local volunteers. The conservation of water resources could then be achieved with less effort.
Over time, the experience of one particular area could be universally applied so that Taiwan's environmentally-friendly water reservoirs will be filled, gradually diminishing shortage problems.
Liaw Shyue-cherng is an assistant professor in the department of geography at National Taiwan Normal University.
Translated by Perry Svensson
Recently, China launched another diplomatic offensive against Taiwan, improperly linking its “one China principle” with UN General Assembly Resolution 2758 to constrain Taiwan’s diplomatic space. After Taiwan’s presidential election on Jan. 13, China persuaded Nauru to sever diplomatic ties with Taiwan. Nauru cited Resolution 2758 in its declaration of the diplomatic break. Subsequently, during the WHO Executive Board meeting that month, Beijing rallied countries including Venezuela, Zimbabwe, Belarus, Egypt, Nicaragua, Sri Lanka, Laos, Russia, Syria and Pakistan to reiterate the “one China principle” in their statements, and assert that “Resolution 2758 has settled the status of Taiwan” to hinder Taiwan’s
Singaporean Prime Minister Lee Hsien Loong’s (李顯龍) decision to step down after 19 years and hand power to his deputy, Lawrence Wong (黃循財), on May 15 was expected — though, perhaps, not so soon. Most political analysts had been eyeing an end-of-year handover, to ensure more time for Wong to study and shadow the role, ahead of general elections that must be called by November next year. Wong — who is currently both deputy prime minister and minister of finance — would need a combination of fresh ideas, wisdom and experience as he writes the nation’s next chapter. The world that
Can US dialogue and cooperation with the communist dictatorship in Beijing help avert a Taiwan Strait crisis? Or is US President Joe Biden playing into Chinese President Xi Jinping’s (習近平) hands? With America preoccupied with the wars in Europe and the Middle East, Biden is seeking better relations with Xi’s regime. The goal is to responsibly manage US-China competition and prevent unintended conflict, thereby hoping to create greater space for the two countries to work together in areas where their interests align. The existing wars have already stretched US military resources thin, and the last thing Biden wants is yet another war.
Since the Russian invasion of Ukraine in February 2022, people have been asking if Taiwan is the next Ukraine. At a G7 meeting of national leaders in January, Japanese Prime Minister Fumio Kishida warned that Taiwan “could be the next Ukraine” if Chinese aggression is not checked. NATO Secretary-General Jens Stoltenberg has said that if Russia is not defeated, then “today, it’s Ukraine, tomorrow it can be Taiwan.” China does not like this rhetoric. Its diplomats ask people to stop saying “Ukraine today, Taiwan tomorrow.” However, the rhetoric and stated ambition of Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) on Taiwan shows strong parallels with