Chuang Shen-yuan (莊深淵), the judge presiding over the Kuang San financial scandal (廣三案) case, searched former Legislative Yuan Speaker Liu Sung-fan's (劉松藩) residence a few weeks ago, triggering controversies over judicial independence. Yang Jen-shou (楊仁壽), secretary-general of the Judicial Yuan (司法院), said a legitimate search should have taken the timing of the search into consideration. Some judges criticized Chuang for being insufficiently sensitive to political issues.
What matters most about a judge is morality. Chuang is highly regarded for his moral character. Even Lin Chih-chung (林志忠), an attorney of Kuang San Group Chairman Tseng Cheng-jen (曾正仁), said Chuang "has no political character." From this viewpoint, we can exclude the assumption that Chuang is a brown-noser who carries out political persecution for the KMT. The uproar over the incident was basically the result of a "lack of political sensitivity." Chuang failed to notice the timing problem, resulting in the inappropriate linkage between the judicature and politics.
Is a "lack of political sensitivity" a defect? Should a judge be alert to political timing while investigating a case?
Taiwan's judicature lacks public credibility mainly because judges are too politically sensitive and are too aware of timing. Their political sense is so good that they dare not punish corrupted government officials. They are so concerned about timing that there is judicial leniency during election period. Therefore, "get elected or go to jail (當選過關落選被關)" has become a common dictum and we have dozens of legislators standing trial, their punishment having been delayed for as much as 10 years. And that is also why gangsters are able to bid for official positions and take control of politics.
People in the Taiwan hate "black gold politics." They criticized the judiciary for not being independent, but they also blamed Chuang for his poor political sense. Aren't they contradicting themselves?
That Taiwan's judicature is not independent is well-known, but it is not Chuang's fault. He was just made the scapegoat. Because his fellow colleagues are too aware of how to ride the tide of their times, Chuang, who insists on judicial independence, has been branded as a political hitman. Because his colleagues fail to take a firm stand on justice, Chuang's insistence becomes selective justice.
If those who know how to ride the tide of his times are encouraged and the person who has poor political sense is thrown into the pit, then judicial independence will always be a slogan.
Chuang Pei-chang is chief editorial writer of the China Times Express.
Having lived through former British prime minister Boris Johnson’s tumultuous and scandal-ridden administration, the last place I had expected to come face-to-face with “Mr Brexit” was in a hotel ballroom in Taipei. Should I have been so surprised? Over the past few years, Taiwan has unfortunately become the destination of choice for washed-up Western politicians to turn up long after their political careers have ended, making grandiose speeches in exchange for extraordinarily large paychecks far exceeding the annual salary of all but the wealthiest of Taiwan’s business tycoons. Taiwan’s pursuit of bygone politicians with little to no influence in their home
In 2025, it is easy to believe that Taiwan has always played a central role in various assessments of global national interests. But that is a mistaken belief. Taiwan’s position in the world and the international support it presently enjoys are relatively new and remain highly vulnerable to challenges from China. In the early 2000s, the George W. Bush Administration had plans to elevate bilateral relations and to boost Taiwan’s defense. It designated Taiwan as a non-NATO ally, and in 2001 made available to Taiwan a significant package of arms to enhance the island’s defenses including the submarines it long sought.
US lobbyist Christian Whiton has published an update to his article, “How Taiwan Lost Trump,” discussed on the editorial page on Sunday. His new article, titled “What Taiwan Should Do” refers to the three articles published in the Taipei Times, saying that none had offered a solution to the problems he identified. That is fair. The articles pushed back on points Whiton made that were felt partisan, misdirected or uninformed; in this response, he offers solutions of his own. While many are on point and he would find no disagreement here, the nuances of the political and historical complexities in
Taiwan faces an image challenge even among its allies, as it must constantly counter falsehoods and misrepresentations spread by its more powerful neighbor, the People’s Republic of China (PRC). While Taiwan refrains from disparaging its troublesome neighbor to other countries, the PRC is working not only to forge a narrative about itself, its intentions and value to the international community, but is also spreading lies about Taiwan. Governments, parliamentary groups and civil societies worldwide are caught in this narrative tug-of-war, each responding in their own way. National governments have the power to push back against what they know to be
RSS