Facebook has bumped up the price it planned to charge for shares at is stock market debut, giving the leading social network a value that could top US$100 billion, according to reports on Monday.
Facebook will price its initial public offering (IPO) from US$34 to US$38 per share instead of the US$28 to US$35 range indicated in paperwork filed earlier this month with US regulators, according to CNBC and the Wall Street Journal.
The raised IPO share price reflected confidence in demand for Facebook stock and gave the Menlo Park, California-based company a value between US$93 and US$104 billion.
At the higher end of the price range, Facebook would raise nearly US$15 billion through the stock sale, with a large chunk of the cash going to its early backers and employees compensated with stock.
Facebook was already assured of becoming the most valuable US Web company at the time of an IPO, topping Google’s US$23 billion valuation in 2004.
Facebook will trade under the symbol “FB” on the technology-heavy NASDAQ. Trading was expected to be launched on Friday, according to news reports.
Meanwhile, half of Americans think Facebook is a passing fad, according to the results of a new Associated Press-CNBC poll. And, in the run-up to the social network’s IPO, half of Americans also say the social network’s expected asking price is too high.
Just a third of those surveyed think the company’s expected value is appropriate, while 50 percent say it is too high. Those who invest in the stock market are more likely to see Facebook as overvalued, 58 percent said. About three in 10 investors say the expected value of shares is fair.
However, price worries would not necessarily stop would-be investors. Half the people surveyed say they think Facebook is a good bet, while 31 percent do not. The rest are not sure. Americans who invest in stocks roughly agree, although investors who are more “active” — those who have changed their holdings in the past month — are more negative. Nearly 40 percent say Facebook would not be a good investment.
The public overall is similarly divided on the company’s future. Just under half of adults (46 percent) predict a short timeline for Facebook, while 43 percent say it has staying power.
The Associated Press-CNBC Poll was conducted from May 3 to Monday last week by GfK Roper Public Affairs and Corporate Communications. It involved landline and mobile telephone interviews with 1,004 adults across the US and has a margin of sampling error of plus or minus 3.9 percentage points.
CHIP RACE: Three years of overbroad export controls drove foreign competitors to pursue their own AI chips, and ‘cost US taxpayers billions of dollars,’ Nvidia said China has figured out the US strategy for allowing it to buy Nvidia Corp’s H200s and is rejecting the artificial intelligence (AI) chip in favor of domestically developed semiconductors, White House AI adviser David Sacks said, citing news reports. US President Donald Trump on Monday said that he would allow shipments of Nvidia’s H200 chips to China, part of an administration effort backed by Sacks to challenge Chinese tech champions such as Huawei Technologies Co (華為) by bringing US competition to their home market. On Friday, Sacks signaled that he was uncertain about whether that approach would work. “They’re rejecting our chips,” Sacks
NATIONAL SECURITY: Intel’s testing of ACM tools despite US government control ‘highlights egregious gaps in US technology protection policies,’ a former official said Chipmaker Intel Corp has tested chipmaking tools this year from a toolmaker with deep roots in China and two overseas units that were targeted by US sanctions, according to two sources with direct knowledge of the matter. Intel, which fended off calls for its CEO’s resignation from US President Donald Trump in August over his alleged ties to China, got the tools from ACM Research Inc, a Fremont, California-based producer of chipmaking equipment. Two of ACM’s units, based in Shanghai and South Korea, were among a number of firms barred last year from receiving US technology over claims they have
BARRIERS: Gudeng’s chairman said it was unlikely that the US could replicate Taiwan’s science parks in Arizona, given its strict immigration policies and cultural differences Gudeng Precision Industrial Co (家登), which supplies wafer pods to the world’s major semiconductor firms, yesterday said it is in no rush to set up production in the US due to high costs. The company supplies its customers through a warehouse in Arizona jointly operated by TSS Holdings Ltd (德鑫控股), a joint holding of Gudeng and 17 Taiwanese firms in the semiconductor supply chain, including specialty plastic compounds producer Nytex Composites Co (耐特) and automated material handling system supplier Symtek Automation Asia Co (迅得). While the company has long been exploring the feasibility of setting up production in the US to address
OPTION: Uber said it could provide higher pay for batch trips, if incentives for batching is not removed entirely, as the latter would force it to pass on the costs to consumers Uber Technologies Inc yesterday warned that proposed restrictions on batching orders and minimum wages could prompt a NT$20 delivery fee increase in Taiwan, as lower efficiency would drive up costs. Uber CEO Dara Khosrowshahi made the remarks yesterday during his visit to Taiwan. He is on a multileg trip to the region, which includes stops in South Korea and Japan. His visit coincided the release last month of the Ministry of Labor’s draft bill on the delivery sector, which aims to safeguard delivery workers’ rights and improve their welfare. The ministry set the minimum pay for local food delivery drivers at
RSS