Sat, Dec 02, 2023 page5

• Meta closes fake accounts from China

  ELECTION INTERFERENCE: Meta did not publicly link the account network to the Chinese government, but said it is based in China and sought to inflate divisions within the US

  • AP, WASHINGTON
  • • 
    • 
    • 

  Someone in China created thousands of fake social media accounts designed to appear to be from Americans and used them to spread polarizing political content in an apparent effort to divide the US ahead of next year’s presidential elections, Meta said on Thursday.

  The network of about 4,800 fake accounts was attempting to build an audience when it was identified and eliminated by the tech company, which owns Facebook and Instagram. The accounts sported fake photos, names and locations as a way to appear like everyday American Facebook users weighing in on political issues.

  Instead of spreading fake content as other networks have done, the accounts were used to reshare posts from X, the platform formerly known as Twitter, that were created by politicians, news outlets and others. The interconnected accounts pulled content from both liberal and conservative sources, an indication that its goal was not to support one side or the other but to exaggerate partisan divisions and further inflame polarization.

  

  The Meta logo is pictured in Las Vegas, Nevada, on Jan. 4.

  Photo: AFP

  The newly identified network shows how US’ foreign adversaries exploit US-based tech platforms to sow discord and distrust, and it hints at the serious threats posed by online disinformation next year, when national elections would occur in Taiwan, the US, India, Mexico, Ukraine, Pakistan and other nations.

  “These networks still struggle to build audiences, but they’re a warning,” said Ben Nimmo, who leads investigations into inauthentic behavior on Meta’s platforms. “Foreign threat actors are attempting to reach people across the internet ahead of next year’s elections, and we need to remain alert.”

  Meta Platforms Inc, based in Menlo Park, California, did not publicly link the Chinese network to the Chinese government, but it did determine the network originated in that country. The content spread by the accounts broadly complements other Chinese government propaganda and disinformation that has sought to inflate partisan and ideological divisions within the US.

  To appear more like ordinary Facebook accounts, the network would sometimes post about fashion or pets. Earlier this year, some of the accounts abruptly replaced their American-sounding user names and profile pictures with new ones suggesting they lived in India. The accounts then began spreading pro-Chinese content about Tibet and India, reflecting how fake networks could be redirected to focus on new targets.

  Meta often points to its efforts to shut down fake social media networks as evidence of its commitment to protecting election integrity and democracy, but critics say the platform’s focus on fake accounts distracts from its failure to address its responsibility for the misinformation already on its site that has contributed to polarization and distrust.

  For instance, Meta is to accept paid advertisements on its site to claim the US presidential election in 2020 was rigged or stolen, amplifying the lies of former US president Donald Trump and other Republicans whose claims about election irregularities have been repeatedly debunked. Federal and state election officials and Trump’s own attorney general have said there is no credible evidence that the presidential election, which Trump lost to Democrat Joe Biden, was tainted.

  When asked about its ad policy, Meta said it is focusing on future elections, not ones from the past, and would reject ads casting unfounded doubt on upcoming contests.

  And while Meta has announced a new artificial intelligence (AI) policy that would require political ads to bear a disclaimer if they contain AI-generated content, the company has allowed other altered videos that were created using more conventional programs to remain on its platform, including a digitally edited video of Biden that claims he is a pedophile.

  “This is a company that cannot be taken seriously and that cannot be trusted,” said Zamaan Qureshi, a policy adviser at the Real Facebook Oversight Board, an organization of civil rights leaders and tech experts who have been critical of Meta’s approach to disinformation and hate speech.

  “Watch what Meta does, not what they say,” Qureshi added.

  Meta executives discussed the network’s activities during a conference call with reporters on Wednesday, the day after the tech giant announced its policies for the upcoming election year — most of which were put in place for prior elections.

  However, next year poses new challenges, said experts who study the link between social media and disinformation.

  Not only will many large countries hold national elections, but the emergence of sophisticated AI programs means it is easier than ever to create lifelike audio and video that could mislead voters.

  “Platforms still are not taking their role in the public sphere seriously,” said Jennifer Stromer-Galley, a Syracuse University academic who studies digital media.
• Most Popular

  • 1

    First person arrested as Danjiang Bridge opens

  • 2

    TSMC shares stumble on report, but losses minor

  • 3

    Navy needs 12 subs for modern fleet: CSBC head

  • 4

    Snake on a train spooks riders on Taipei MRT line

  • 5

    HIMARS to be deployed to islands