US President Donald Trump’s decision to impose a partial blockade on Venezuela is a dramatic escalation in US pressure on Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro, but it risks undermining a top US policy goal: deterring a potential Chinese naval encirclement of Taiwan.
Trump on Tuesday last week ordered the “total and complete blockade” of all sanctioned oil tankers entering and leaving Venezuela, a move aimed at strangling the Maduro government’s main source of income. The action immediately raised questions under international law about whether it amounts to an act of war.
In the Indo-Pacific region, military planners have long feared that China might use a naval blockade to coerce democratically governed Taiwan to accept Beijing’s rule.
Photo: Reuters
Experts say Beijing could exploit a US blockade of Venezuela to undercut any American efforts to drum up international diplomatic opposition to such a move in the Taiwan Strait.
“If the US blockades to change political outcomes in Venezuela, China can justify coercive measures against Taiwan on so-called security grounds,” said Craig Singleton, a China expert at the think tank Foundation for Defense of Democracies in Washington.
“The legal contexts differ, but the propaganda opening is real,” he said, adding that precedent in international relations is set not only by law, but by narrative.
BLURRED TERMS
“When Washington blurs terms, it weakens its ability to call out coercion elsewhere,” he said.
The blockade is the latest step in a US military buildup that has included more than two dozen strikes on alleged drug boats to pressure Maduro and other senior Venezuelan officials, who the Trump administration says are linked to drug traffickers.
Maduro has said that the US action is aimed at overthrowing him and gaining control of the OPEC nation’s oil resources, which are the world’s largest crude reserves.
“President Trump is prepared to use every element of American power to stop drugs from flooding into our country and to bring those responsible to justice,” a White House official said in response to Reuters’ questions, without addressing the Taiwan issue.
China, the biggest buyer of Venezuelan crude, has sided with Venezuela, saying on Thursday that it “opposes all acts of unilateralism and bullying and supports countries in defending their sovereignty and national dignity.”
Beijing has repeatedly signaled that a de facto naval blockade could be a key element of a campaign to gain control of Taiwan.
China’s military has practiced blockade-style drills with increasing frequency in recent years around Taiwan, whose government rejects Beijing’s claims.
To an international audience, Chinese officials would probably portray such a move around Taiwan as a domestic quarantine or law enforcement matter.
Taiwanese officials have said a Chinese blockade of Taiwan would be an act of war and have far-reaching consequences for international trade.
Washington, which opposes unilateral changes to the “status quo” over Taiwan, would say that Chinese naval encirclement of Taiwan would amount to a blockade.
The Trump administration’s national security strategy released earlier this month called deterring conflict over Taiwan a priority due to its strategic location and economic importance.
CHINA’S GOAL
Isaac Kardon, a senior fellow at the Carnegie Endowment for International Peace who studies China’s maritime power, said Beijing would want to prevent the US from building a global coalition to oppose Chinese action toward Taiwan. International concern about a US blockade of Venezuela would be useful for China’s effort.
“Ultimately, the US is doing a lot of damage to the normative quality of the rules,” Kardon said. “That is a major blow to the credibility of international law to restrain other actors.”
Kardon said US action on Venezuelan tankers could open the door for China to take similar actions, such as interdicting Taiwan-bound vessels carrying vital natural gas supplies.
“Everything about it muddies the waters,” he said.
Protracted deployment to the Caribbean of US naval assets could undermine US military readiness and its ability to respond to a crisis in the Taiwan Strait, experts said.
Wartime blockades are permitted under international law, but only under strict conditions.
A full US blockade of Venezuela would likely be illegal without clear evidence that the US was in armed conflict with the country, said Milena Sterio, a maritime law expert at Cleveland State University.
“A US blockade would undermine our ability to criticize a Chinese blockade of Taiwan,” Sterio said. “The same rules of international law apply to all states and it would be inconsistent for the US to criticize others for doing what we are doing.”
Michael Hunzeker, a specialist on Taiwan’s military deterrence at George Mason University, said he was skeptical that Trump’s actions would hurt the effort that really matters: building US allied support for counter-blockade efforts in a crisis over Taiwan.
Any reference by allies to Venezuela in that context, Hunzeker said, would likely be rhetorical justification for a realpolitik decision to remain on the sidelines.
“I highly doubt that this episode will significantly reshape how they assess those interests,” he said.
SHIPS, TRAINS AND AUTOMOBILES: The ministry has announced changes to varied transportation industries taking effect soon, with a number of effects for passengers Beginning next month, the post office is canceling signature upon delivery and written inquiry services for international registered small packets in accordance with the new policy of the Universal Postal Union, the Ministry of Transportation and Communications said yesterday. The new policy does not apply to packets that are to be delivered to China, the ministry said. Senders of international registered small packets would receive a NT$10 rebate on postage if the packets are sent from Jan. 1 to March 31, it added. The ministry said that three other policies are also scheduled to take effect next month. International cruise ship operators
NUMBERS IMBALANCE: More than 4 million Taiwanese have visited China this year, while only about half a million Chinese have visited here Beijing has yet to respond to Taiwan’s requests for negotiation over matters related to the recovery of cross-strait tourism, the Tourism Administration said yesterday. Taiwan’s tourism authority issued the statement after Chinese-language daily the China Times reported yesterday that the government’s policy of banning group tours to China does not stop Taiwanese from visiting the country. As of October, more than 4.2 million had traveled to China this year, exceeding last year. Beijing estimated the number of Taiwanese tourists in China could reach 4.5 million this year. By contrast, only 500,000 Chinese tourists are expected in Taiwan, the report said. The report
The Forestry and Nature Conservation Agency yesterday launched a gift box to market honey “certified by a Formosan black bear” in appreciation of a beekeeper’s amicable interaction with a honey-thieving bear. Beekeeper Chih Ming-chen (池明鎮) in January inspected his bee farm in Hualien County’s Jhuosi Township (卓溪) and found that more than 20 beehives had been destroyed and many hives were eaten, with bear droppings and paw prints near the destroyed hives, the agency said. Chih returned to the farm to move the remaining beehives away that evening when he encountered a Formosan black bear only 20m away, the agency said. The bear
Chinese embassy staffers attempted to interrupt an award ceremony of an international tea competition in France when the organizer introduced Taiwan and displayed the Republic of China flag, a Taiwanese tea farmer said in an interview published today. Hsieh Chung-lin (謝忠霖), chief executive of Juxin Tea Factory from Taichung's Lishan (梨山) area, on Dec. 2 attended the Teas of the World International Contest held at the Peruvian embassy in Paris. Hsieh was awarded a special prize for his Huagang Snow Source Tea by the nonprofit Agency for the Valorization of Agricultural Products (AVPA). During the ceremony, two Chinese embassy staffers in attendance
RSS