Large crowds assembled around the Legislative Yuan in Taipei and other cities nationwide yesterday to protest efforts by opposition lawmakers to pass a set of controversial legislative reform bills.
More than 50 civil groups coordinated the protests, which organizers said were called to “defend Taiwan’s democracy” against efforts by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) to push through bills that seek to expand the legislature’s powers of investigation and oversight over the executive branch.
Organizers estimate that more than 100,000 people had gathered outside the Legislative Yuan as of press time last night, centered around two stages on streets north and south of the chamber.
Photo: Liu Hsin-de, Taipei Times
Slogans called for citizen action to “oppose abuse of power by legislators” and “refuse ‘black box’ processes.”
Many protesters also held signs saying: “I have contempt for the legislature,” as lawmakers met inside to vote through to the third reading bills that would expand legislative powers of investigation and make it a criminal offense to be in contempt of the legislature.
Taiwan Economic Democracy Union convener Lai Chung-chiang (賴中強) when speaking on stage said that the KMT and TPP circumvented normal deliberation processes, clause-by-clause reviews and cross-party negotiations to force through to a vote, saying that many lawmakers did not even know what the bills said.
Photo: RITCHIE B. TONGO, EPA-EFE
“It is fortunate for Taiwan that many citizens are alarmed by the non-transparent ‘black box’ process, and concerned that the KMT and TPP are working to undermine our democracy,” said Lai, whose organization along with the Taiwan Citizen Front and the Alliance of Referendum for Taiwan organized the nationwide protests.
“But we shall keep protesting so our citizens can have confidence in Taiwan’s democratic system,” he said. “Even if lawmakers pass these controversial bills through the third reading to expand their power, we shall fight on to protect democracy and safeguard Taiwan.”
People can petition for a public referendum to negate the bills, as well as launch recall campaigns within their constituencies against opposition legislators, Lai said.
Photo: CNA
He also said that the Executive Yuan can veto the bills due to fiscal constraints or procedural issues.
Organizing committees and volunteers set up tents to the north and south of the Legislative Yuan and at the adjacent Chelam Presbyterian Church with stations for medical teams, where they also provided free water bottles, biscuits and other supplies for participants donated by benefactors and stockpiled at the church grounds.
Some counterprotesters attended in small numbers following calls from opposition lawmakers to take to the streets in support of the bills.
The KMT had applied to hold a protest on Qingdao E Road, where they had a stage truck set up, but only a handful of people were there through the evening.
In Kaohsiung, a march that started at Central Park (中央公園) drew more than 3,500 people, the organizers said.
Protests were also held in other central and southern cities, drawing smaller crowds of about 500 in Taichung and Changhua, about 300 in Tainan, 200 in Chiayi and 100 in Taitung, organizers said.
The Presbyterian Church of Taiwan also organized “Pray for Taiwan” events at 7pm yesterday at the Chelam Presbyterian Church in Taipei, along with selected church sessions in Taoyuan, Taichung and Tainan.
The Executive Yuan yesterday announced that registration for a one-time universal NT$10,000 cash handout to help people in Taiwan survive US tariffs and inflation would start on Nov. 5, with payouts available as early as Nov. 12. Who is eligible for the handout? Registered Taiwanese nationals are eligible, including those born in Taiwan before April 30 next year with a birth certificate. Non-registered nationals with residence permits, foreign permanent residents and foreign spouses of Taiwanese citizens with residence permits also qualify for the handouts. For people who meet the eligibility requirements, but passed away between yesterday and April 30 next year, surviving family members
The German city of Hamburg on Oct. 14 named a bridge “Kaohsiung-Brucke” after the Taiwanese city of Kaohsiung. The footbridge, formerly known as F566, is to the east of the Speicherstadt, the world’s largest warehouse district, and connects the Dar-es-Salaam-Platz to the Brooktorpromenade near the Port of Hamburg on the Elbe River. Timo Fischer, a Free Democratic Party member of the Hamburg-Mitte District Assembly, in May last year proposed the name change with support from members of the Social Democratic Party and the Christian Democratic Union. Kaohsiung and Hamburg in 1999 inked a sister city agreement, but despite more than a quarter-century of
Taiwanese officials are courting podcasters and influencers aligned with US President Donald Trump as they grow more worried the US leader could undermine Taiwanese interests in talks with China, people familiar with the matter said. Trump has said Taiwan would likely be on the agenda when he is expected to meet Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) next week in a bid to resolve persistent trade tensions. China has asked the White House to officially declare it “opposes” Taiwanese independence, Bloomberg reported last month, a concession that would mark a major diplomatic win for Beijing. President William Lai (賴清德) and his top officials
‘ONE CHINA’: A statement that Berlin decides its own China policy did not seem to sit well with Beijing, which offered only one meeting with the German official German Minister for Foreign Affairs Johann Wadephul’s trip to China has been canceled, a spokesperson for his ministry said yesterday, amid rising tensions between the two nations, including over Taiwan. Wadephul had planned to address Chinese curbs on rare earths during his visit, but his comments about Berlin deciding on the “design” of its “one China” policy ahead of the trip appear to have rankled China. Asked about Wadephul’s comments, Chinese Ministry of Foreign Affairs spokesman Guo Jiakun (郭嘉昆) said the “one China principle” has “no room for any self-definition.” In the interview published on Thursday, Wadephul said he would urge China to