Pilot error is to blame for TransAsia Airways Flight GE235 crashing into the Keelung River in Taipei last year, according to the Aviation Safety Council’s (ASC) final report released yesterday.
Investigators said a series of mistakes that were made due to ineffective communication between the two pilots and their failure to follow standard flight procedures were the main causes of the crash that killed 43 people.
The aircraft crashed on Feb. 4 last year, less than three minutes after taking off from Taipei International Airport (Songshan airport), which is about 5.4km west of the crash site.
Photo: EPA / TVBS Taiwan
The 10-month-old ATR 72-600 aircraft was en route from Taipei to Kinmen with 53 passengers and five crew members on board. There were 15 survivors.
The pilots should have aborted takeoff after noticing that a power-control system was not armed, investigators said in the report.
The investigators have previously said that the aircraft’s automatic takeoff power control system (ATPCS) had not been armed when the turboprop began its departure roll.
Photo: Huang Yao-cheng, Taipei Times
Four seconds after takeoff, the co-pilot pointed out an error in the ATPCS.
However, the captain replied: “OK, continue takeoff.”
The system provides automatic support — including uptrim and auto-feathering — in the event of an engine failure during takeoff.
In addition, the pilots inadvertently reduced power from the plane’s healthy left-hand engine, instead of the right-hand engine that was exhibiting problems, according to the report.
The mistakes occurred due to poor communication between the two pilots about the engine problems, investigators said, citing recordings of the captain on the cockpit voice recorder.
The errors led to both of the airplane’s engines losing power, the report said.
The voice recording indicated that eight seconds before the crash, one of the pilots exclaimed: “Oh, no, wrong throttle [was pulled back],” the report said.
Investigators also found that during flight training sessions, the captain had difficulty dealing with abnormal or emergency situations such as engine failure, but TransAsia did not address the problem, according to the report.
Officials said that the captain had failed a flight simulator test in May 2014, in part because he had insufficient knowledge of how to deal with an engine flameout on takeoff.
The ASC said TransAsia training supervisors had told ATR 72-600 pilots that they should abort takeoff if the ATPCS was not armed during the roll, a procedure that had been “emphasized” during pilot training.
However, the procedure for aborting is not clearly described in any manual or guidelines for the airline’s flight crew, the report said.
Investigators said cracked welds in the aircraft engine might also have been a factor that affected the plane’s functions.
The crash was the airline’s second in seven months — both involving French-Italian made ATR 72-type aircraft.
On July 23, 2014, TransAsia Flight GE222, an ATR 72-500 aircraft, crashed in a village near Magong Airport in Penghu.
The issue of TransAsia pilots not following standard operating procedures, which caused the ATR72-500 crash, has apparently not improved, ASC Executive Director Thomas Wang (王興中) said.
The ASC suggested that the airline review its pilot training programs, internal monitoring and supervisory measures to improve flight safety.
TransAsia Airways chairman Vincent Lin (林明昇) yesterday said that he respects the results of the investigation and that the airline would continue to improve flight safety by inviting the Flight Safety Foundation, the Airbus Flight Safety Department and the Bureau Veritas Group to provide guidance.
‘NO SECURITY RISK’: The Railway Bureau reassured the public that the technicians’ activities were limited to technical guidance and did not involve sensitive systems The Railway Bureau yesterday said it had invited eight Chinese technicians to assist with an airport MRT construction project. The bureau issued the confirmation after an Internet user said Chinese nationals had entered the construction zone of Taiwan Taoyuan International Airport’s Terminal 3 project. They asked why “individuals from an enemy state” were allowed access to such a major national infrastructure project, which raised serious concerns over Taiwan’s industrial safety, sensitive systems and information security. The bureau’s Northern Region Engineering Branch Office said subcontractor Taiwan Handle Industrial Co (台灣手把工業) of the Taoyuan airport MRT’s “Contract No. CU05 Project A14 Station Civil, MEP &
The National Chungshan Institute of Science and Technology yesterday showcased its locally developed variants of the Vision 60 robotic patrol dog, which it plans to deploy on the nation’s outlying territories in the South China Sea. The variants were produced under the Joint Lab project — created by the institute and domestic companies — and assembled with domestically produced motors, lenses and artificial intelligence (AI) systems alongside licensed tech from the US, Missile and Rocket Systems Research Division deputy director Jen Kuo-kang (任國光) told the media event at a military base in Taipei’s Dazhi (大直) area. Taiwan has built up its strengths
TIT-FOR-TAT: The US allegedly revoked the visa of a Chinese national working at Xinhua News Agency in the US in response to Beijing’s expulsion of Vivian Wang The Presidential Office yesterday condemned China for expelling a New York Times correspondent from Beijing following the newspaper’s interview with President William Lai (賴清德), saying the move highlighted Beijing’s suppression of press freedom and its threat to international news media. Taiwan has noted a series of recent incidents in which Beijing used similar tactics to “threaten and pressure international media outlets and journalists,” Presidential Office spokeswoman Karen Kuo (郭雅慧) said in a statement. “This concerns not only press freedom and freedom of expression, but also the safety of journalists, and Taiwan and relevant partners are paying close attention to the situation,” she
NOT IMMEDIATE: Taiwan has a chance to appeal the proposed 10 percent tariff before it starts, while other countries face a 12.5 percent tariff from the trade office Taiwan is among 60 economies determined by the US to have failed to impose or enforce a ban on the importation of goods produced with forced labor, according to a notice released on Tuesday by the Office of the US Trade Representative (USTR), which proposed imposing an additional 10 percent or more tariff on them. The USTR in a statement said that following an investigation, it had determined under Section 301 of the Trade Act of 1974 that the failure of the 60 economies to impose and effectively enforce a prohibition on the importation of goods produced with forced labor is