Pilot error is to blame for TransAsia Airways Flight GE235 crashing into the Keelung River in Taipei last year, according to the Aviation Safety Council’s (ASC) final report released yesterday.
Investigators said a series of mistakes that were made due to ineffective communication between the two pilots and their failure to follow standard flight procedures were the main causes of the crash that killed 43 people.
The aircraft crashed on Feb. 4 last year, less than three minutes after taking off from Taipei International Airport (Songshan airport), which is about 5.4km west of the crash site.
Photo: EPA / TVBS Taiwan
The 10-month-old ATR 72-600 aircraft was en route from Taipei to Kinmen with 53 passengers and five crew members on board. There were 15 survivors.
The pilots should have aborted takeoff after noticing that a power-control system was not armed, investigators said in the report.
The investigators have previously said that the aircraft’s automatic takeoff power control system (ATPCS) had not been armed when the turboprop began its departure roll.
Photo: Huang Yao-cheng, Taipei Times
Four seconds after takeoff, the co-pilot pointed out an error in the ATPCS.
However, the captain replied: “OK, continue takeoff.”
The system provides automatic support — including uptrim and auto-feathering — in the event of an engine failure during takeoff.
In addition, the pilots inadvertently reduced power from the plane’s healthy left-hand engine, instead of the right-hand engine that was exhibiting problems, according to the report.
The mistakes occurred due to poor communication between the two pilots about the engine problems, investigators said, citing recordings of the captain on the cockpit voice recorder.
The errors led to both of the airplane’s engines losing power, the report said.
The voice recording indicated that eight seconds before the crash, one of the pilots exclaimed: “Oh, no, wrong throttle [was pulled back],” the report said.
Investigators also found that during flight training sessions, the captain had difficulty dealing with abnormal or emergency situations such as engine failure, but TransAsia did not address the problem, according to the report.
Officials said that the captain had failed a flight simulator test in May 2014, in part because he had insufficient knowledge of how to deal with an engine flameout on takeoff.
The ASC said TransAsia training supervisors had told ATR 72-600 pilots that they should abort takeoff if the ATPCS was not armed during the roll, a procedure that had been “emphasized” during pilot training.
However, the procedure for aborting is not clearly described in any manual or guidelines for the airline’s flight crew, the report said.
Investigators said cracked welds in the aircraft engine might also have been a factor that affected the plane’s functions.
The crash was the airline’s second in seven months — both involving French-Italian made ATR 72-type aircraft.
On July 23, 2014, TransAsia Flight GE222, an ATR 72-500 aircraft, crashed in a village near Magong Airport in Penghu.
The issue of TransAsia pilots not following standard operating procedures, which caused the ATR72-500 crash, has apparently not improved, ASC Executive Director Thomas Wang (王興中) said.
The ASC suggested that the airline review its pilot training programs, internal monitoring and supervisory measures to improve flight safety.
TransAsia Airways chairman Vincent Lin (林明昇) yesterday said that he respects the results of the investigation and that the airline would continue to improve flight safety by inviting the Flight Safety Foundation, the Airbus Flight Safety Department and the Bureau Veritas Group to provide guidance.
LIMITS: While China increases military pressure on Taiwan and expands its use of cognitive warfare, it is unwilling to target tech supply chains, the report said US and Taiwan military officials have warned that the Chinese People’s Liberation Army (PLA) could implement a blockade within “a matter of hours” and need only “minimal conversion time” prior to an attack on Taiwan, a report released on Tuesday by the US Senate’s China Economic and Security Review Commission said. “While there is no indication that China is planning an imminent attack, the United States and its allies and partners can no longer assume that a Taiwan contingency is a distant possibility for which they would have ample time to prepare,” it said. The commission made the comments in its annual
DETERMINATION: Beijing’s actions toward Tokyo have drawn international attention, but would likely bolster regional coordination and defense networks, the report said Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s administration is likely to prioritize security reforms and deterrence in the face of recent “hybrid” threats from China, the National Security Bureau (NSB) said. The bureau made the assessment in a written report to the Legislative Yuan ahead of an oral report and questions-and-answers session at the legislature’s Foreign Affairs and National Defense Committee tomorrow. The key points of Japan’s security reforms would be to reinforce security cooperation with the US, including enhancing defense deployment in the first island chain, pushing forward the integrated command and operations of the Japan Self-Defense Forces and US Forces Japan, as
IN THE NATIONAL INTEREST: Deputy Minister of Foreign Affairs Francois Wu said the strengthening of military facilities would help to maintain security in the Taiwan Strait Japanese Minister of Defense Shinjiro Koizumi, visiting a military base close to Taiwan, said plans to deploy missiles to the post would move forward as tensions smolder between Tokyo and Beijing. “The deployment can help lower the chance of an armed attack on our country,” Koizumi told reporters on Sunday as he wrapped up his first trip to the base on the southern Japanese island of Yonaguni. “The view that it will heighten regional tensions is not accurate.” Former Japanese minister of defense Gen Nakatani in January said that Tokyo wanted to base Type 03 Chu-SAM missiles on Yonaguni, but little progress
NO CHANGES: A Japanese spokesperson said that Tokyo remains consistent and open for dialogue, while Beijing has canceled diplomatic engagements A Japanese official blasted China’s claims that Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi has altered Japan’s position on a Taiwan crisis as “entirely baseless,” calling for more dialogue to stop ties between Asia’s top economies from spiraling. China vowed to take resolute self-defense against Japan if it “dared to intervene militarily in the Taiwan Strait” in a letter delivered Friday to the UN. “I’m aware of this letter,” said Maki Kobayashi, a senior Japanese government spokeswoman. “The claim our country has altered its position is entirely baseless,” she said on the sidelines of the G20 summit in Johannesburg on Saturday. The Chinese Ministry