Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chairman Huang Kuo-chang’s (黃國昌) New Year’s resolution was to get healthy and fit. On New Year’s Eve, he released a video detailing his journey and released photos showing off not only his progress but also his newly buff physique.
Regardless of what one thinks of his politics, he looks great and earned it. There has not been this much beefcake in Taiwan politics since Freddy Lim (林昶佐) decided not to run for re-election.
Like Huang, recently the TPP has been showing signs of health, discipline and fitness. This should make their pan-blue coalition partners, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), nervous, and the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) very concerned.
Photo taken from Huang Kuo-chang’s Instagram
As a smaller third party, they still face significant uphill challenges. Their legal problems and scandals have also not disappeared.
Yet so far, for all their trials and tribulations, the party appears to be becoming harder, smarter and stronger.
STAVING OFF DISASTER
Photo taken from Huang Kuo-chang’s Instagram
In August 2024, the TPP was in serious trouble. It came to light that the party had submitted seriously flawed financial reports, which put it into damage control mode. It also came out that party founder and then chairman Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) had used government election subsidies to purchase property for himself, which is not illegal, but is a very bad look. Then it got worse: Ko was detained incommunicado for a year on corruption charges.
Huang took control of the party and likely saved it from disaster. Their polling numbers had plunged, but under Huang, they stabilized, maintaining the party as a viable, though weakened, force.
Following the DPP’s disastrous official backing of the recall campaigns last summer, their popularity plunged while the KMT’s and TPP’s rose. This put the TPP’s popularity back to where it was before Ko’s detention.
Then, last September, Ko was released on bail. This could have led to a power struggle in the party, but it did not.
Under Huang, the party’s Ko-era ideology was not touched, but the tone and behavior of the party shifted. Huang excels at selective outrage, standing on stage with fist raised, railing at his enemies, the DPP’s “authoritarian regime” of the “dictator” President William Lai (賴清德).
This strategy was successful at staunching the bleeding and keeping the party viable among their core supporters, but it lacked vision. It left open a lot of questions as to what to support the party for, rather than just supporting them for what they are against.
Huang had also further blurred the identity of the party by effectively turning the party into a subsidiary of the KMT. Though the party had successes in the legislature they could point to, they did little to communicate them. Huang preferred to stick to hyperbolic outrage.
Recently, the party has done a far better job of highlighting their own legislative achievements and goals. The emerging image is of a party that is allied with the KMT, but still maintaining something of a distinct agenda and identity.
The TPP is again talking about issues and policy proposals. Huang has resurrected common usage of the “scientific, rational and pragmatic” language that defined the party in the Ko era.
While frequently speaking of his “sincerity” in working with the KMT in this year’s elections and his confidence in their partnership, Huang has been setting some boundaries. He has made it clear he will not be rushed, nor has he backed away from his run for New Taipei City mayor despite KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun’s (鄭麗文) insistence that the KMT must run a candidate there.
Huang is also implementing the party’s two-year pledge for lawmakers, a strategic move conceived by Ko. The party’s lawmakers were all voted in on the party list, so by stepping down, the next ones on the list move up to take their place. This doubles the opportunities to build name recognition to develop budding political talent for the smaller party. Huang has already signed the resignation paperwork, and on Feb. 1, he will lose the powerful platform as legislator and party caucus convener — though he will continue to join the biweekly party caucus morning meetings.
A FORGED BOND
While it is theoretically possible these changes are all Huang’s ideas, that is unlikely. Many of these moves have Ko’s fingerprints all over them.
Meanwhile, Ko has been carefully avoiding stealing the spotlight from Huang and has credited Huang with saving the party. Huang is carefully respectful of Ko as his elder.
This is remarkable. Both men are notoriously stubborn and strong-willed, and have reputations for a “my way or the highway” mentality. Yet, clearly, they are working as a team and by all appearances respect each other.
Both are showing a maturity and deference they were previously not known for possessing. The likely explanation is that they have grown and learned from their mistakes, and their common trials and tribulations — and common interests — have forged a bond between them.
They are also divvying up tasks. Huang will help the party campaign in the north from his base in New Taipei City, while Ko will be heading up the campaign team of their Chiayi City candidate and will concentrate on the south.
I suspect the reason the TPP has held their post-recall popularity bump, unlike the KMT, is this partnership.
Ko is the cerebral, strategic thinker of the two. Huang is a dramatic, effective communicator. This is a powerful combination.
CHALLENGES AHEAD
Another potential opportunity has opened up in Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao’s (高虹安) acquittal on corruption charges on appeal. This cleared the way for her reinstatement as mayor.
After her initial conviction, Kao resigned from the TPP. Last summer, despite the conviction and being suspended from her post, she survived a recall attempt.
This puts Kao in a fairly strong position to run for re-election, and the KMT has made clear they do not plan to challenge her.
They will now need to convince her to rejoin the party. She joined a meeting held by the Hsinchu TPP that was attended by Huang, but so far, she has not officially rejoined. If she does, that will be a big win for the TPP.
There are some serious risks for the party going forward. The verdict in Ko’s corruption trial is due on March 26, and he potentially faces significant jail time — though if found guilty, he can appeal.
Investigators are questioning people close to Huang related to the alleged “paparazzi” scandal. Huang has not been questioned so far, and at this point, he faces no criminal charges. But the possibility of both Huang and Ko facing jail time can not be discounted. KMT Vice Chairman Shawn Hsiao (蕭旭岑) has fretted about this and what it might mean for their cooperation.
The party also lacks the talent pipeline of the two big parties, so growing is a challenge. Headlines in the local press talk of a “tide of defections” from the party, but these are overblown.
The TPP has lost four low-to-mid-level people in the last two months. That is painful for such a small party, and will make their goal of being able to form city and county caucuses in some places harder, but this sort of churn is typical of third parties and by no means exceptional, much less a “tide.”
Overall, the party is likely in the strongest position it has ever been in, though pending legal issues could derail it, and the likeliest successors to these two — Vivian Huang (黃珊珊) and Tsai Pi-ru (蔡壁如) — have been sidelined in the Huang era.
If the party survives these challenges, they could begin to take support from the KMT and challenge the DPP in places they had not anticipated.
Donovan’s Deep Dives is a regular column by Courtney Donovan Smith (石東文) who writes in-depth analysis on everything about Taiwan’s political scene and geopolitics. Donovan is also the central Taiwan correspondent at ICRT FM100 Radio News, co-publisher of Compass Magazine, co-founder Taiwan Report (report.tw) and former chair of the Taichung American Chamber of Commerce. Follow him on X: @donovan_smith.
Jan. 26 to Feb. 1 Nearly 90 years after it was last recorded, the Basay language was taught in a classroom for the first time in September last year. Over the following three months, students learned its sounds along with the customs and folktales of the Ketagalan people, who once spoke it across northern Taiwan. Although each Ketagalan settlement had its own language, Basay functioned as a common trade language. By the late 19th century, it had largely fallen out of daily use as speakers shifted to Hoklo (commonly known as Taiwanese), surviving only in fragments remembered by the elderly. In
William Liu (劉家君) moved to Kaohsiung from Nantou to live with his boyfriend Reg Hong (洪嘉佑). “In Nantou, people do not support gay rights at all and never even talk about it. Living here made me optimistic and made me realize how much I can express myself,” Liu tells the Taipei Times. Hong and his friend Cony Hsieh (謝昀希) are both active in several LGBT groups and organizations in Kaohsiung. They were among the people behind the city’s 16th Pride event in November last year, which gathered over 35,000 people. Along with others, they clearly see Kaohsiung as the nexus of LGBT rights.
Dissident artist Ai Weiwei’s (艾未未) famous return to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has been overshadowed by the astonishing news of the latest arrests of senior military figures for “corruption,” but it is an interesting piece of news in its own right, though more for what Ai does not understand than for what he does. Ai simply lacks the reflective understanding that the loneliness and isolation he imagines are “European” are simply the joys of life as an expat. That goes both ways: “I love Taiwan!” say many still wet-behind-the-ears expats here, not realizing what they love is being an
In the American west, “it is said, water flows upwards towards money,” wrote Marc Reisner in one of the most compelling books on public policy ever written, Cadillac Desert. As Americans failed to overcome the West’s water scarcity with hard work and private capital, the Federal government came to the rescue. As Reisner describes: “the American West quietly became the first and most durable example of the modern welfare state.” In Taiwan, the money toward which water flows upwards is the high tech industry, particularly the chip powerhouse Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電). Typically articles on TSMC’s water demand