The People’s Republic of China (PRC) was out in force in the Taiwan Strait this week, threatening Taiwan with live-fire exercises, aircraft incursions and tedious claims to ownership. The reaction to the PRC’s blockade and decapitation strike exercises offer numerous lessons, if only we are willing to be taught.
Reading the commentary on PRC behavior is like reading Bible interpretation across a range of Christian denominations: the text is recast to mean what the interpreter wants it to mean. Many PRC believers contended that the drills, obviously scheduled in advance, were aimed at the recent arms offer to Taiwan by the administration of US President Donald Trump, citing PRC noises to that effect. Another denomination of believers contended that they were aimed at the recent remarks on a Taiwan contingency by Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi, again citing PRC noises. Observers noted the irony of the PRC performing military drills in the Strait while accusing Japan of reviving militarism.
PRC atheists like President William Lai (賴清德), however, avoided the search for meaning and simply criticized the PRC for being “irrational.” The correct move with the PRC is to ignore the noises it makes and avoid repeating them — they are propaganda designed to influence commentary and signal its shills and speakers on what they should be saying.
Photo: Xinhua via AP
PRC THEATER
The PRC holds periodic large drills because it wants to intimidate the Taiwanese and shore up support at home. Whenever it does, it uses recent events to construct a narrative explaining its behavior that blames Taiwan and its supporting democracies for its own belligerent choices. Remember that a key goal of PRC propaganda is to transfer the tension it manufactures in its relationship with Taiwan to the Taipei-Washington relationship.
The PRC’s seemingly inept poster art publicizing the drill were passed around to laughter on many social media platforms. The last four words of the previous sentence are the key: the PRC was leveraging the Streisand effect to get others to stream its propaganda. Beijing wants people to meme the crap out of its hilariously incompetent poster art because then it gets exposure in all sorts of Taiwan-related discourse spaces it otherwise might not, and for a much longer period of time.
Photo: Eastern Theatetr Command via Reuters
Further, hardly anyone remarked on how the PRC was engaging in theater for its own domestic audience. Chinese people are like any other humans and do not want war. The PRC not only has to legitimate a war to its people, it also has to show that it has the willingness, competence and capacity to carry out that war, in order to gain public support for it. It has cultivated nationalist expansionism in its own people for decades, and now it must keep responding to that public sentiment, lest it lose its own people.
Of course, the usual pro-PRC commentators were out in force blaming the US and Japan for PRC belligerence or deprecating the catastrophic implications of a PRC occupation of Taiwan. Both Jennifer Kavanagh and Stephen Wertheim, who appeared to have been part of a coordinated pro-PRC influence effort ahead of the last meeting between Trump and PRC dictator Xi Jin-ping (習近平) — see “The emerging argument to sell out Taiwan,” Nov. 3, 2025 — made such comments. Kavanagh, for example, observed on X: “A successful Chinese seizure of Taiwan would have little effect on the region’s balance of power.”
Apparently the last five centuries of leaders grabbing Taiwan and then looking south for further expansion never happened.
Photo: EPA
According to this crowd, the US was to blame.
“Beijing’s explanation for the exercises explicitly cites foreign support for Taiwan separatism,” said Paul Heer, a former US government official.
Poor put-upon Beijing, the Jessica Rabbit of nations — it’s not evil, it’s just drawn that way.
INCREASED ACTIVITY
The drills highlighted the increasing PRC activity around Taiwan. The number of ships and airplanes deployed around Taiwan was double that of the previous two years as of October, Vice Minister of National Defense Hsu Szu-chien (徐斯儉) said on Christmas Day. It is clear that the drills are simply somewhat more visible spikes in an ongoing and steadily rising campaign of incursions and “gray zone” activities, several of which have been in this size class. For example, in October last year incursions by 153 aircraft were tracked in a similar one-day drill scenario, which pro-PRC speakers blamed on a speech by President Lai (there is always something going on that the PRC could be angry about). Similarly, 103 aircraft surrounded Taiwan in September of 2023.
The size of PRC incursion events ebbs and flows, but is clearly increasing over time as part of a long-standing policy. The fact that observers automatically search for a “reason” for a specific data point in a policy stream that dates back years is of enormous help to the PRC in its quest to camouflage and conceal its behavior. Well-meaning observers should avoid the search for the meaning behind the PRC’s anger. Instead, PRC verbiage should be regarded as an opportunity for its hacks and shills to out themselves by forwarding rationalizations for the PRC’s aggression that blame its victims.
The drills also had another disinformation function. Jeff Pao observed in a sharp piece at Asia Times that the drills also served the PRC’s information war goal of undermining Taiwan’s faith in its ability to defend itself. He instanced the case of a Chinese military commentator in Italy on YouTube who published a recording of a phone call in which he had been offered a large sum of money to cast doubt on Taiwan’s ability to fight China. One way to do that, the caller suggested, was to criticize Ukraine’s war conduct to show how Taiwan would be punished in a war with the PRC.
Vice Minister of National Defense Hsu’s remarks came a day after the legislature, controlled by the pro-China parties — the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) — voted against reviewing this year’s government budget, including the NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.71 billion) special defense budget bill. This week, as PRC missiles were landing in Taiwan waters, the KMT and TPP again blocked the special defense budget in committee. Note that several of the systems in the offer from the US that has so “angered” the PRC are paid for out of that budget.
One glimmer of hope on that front: Brian Ting (丁瑀) will today be hosting an event at KMT headquarters to criticize the party’s chair, Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), saying she is not a fit person to lead the party because she should be resisting, not supporting, the PRC. As Jojje Olsson, who writes for Swedish media, observed on X, it is unlikely that Ting could host such an event at KMT HQ unless he had support from higher-ups in the party.
It is not too late, but the clock is ticking.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
We lay transfixed under our blankets as the silhouettes of manta rays temporarily eclipsed the moon above us, and flickers of shadow at our feet revealed smaller fish darting in and out of the shelter of the sunken ship. Unwilling to close our eyes against this magnificent spectacle, we continued to watch, oohing and aahing, until the darkness and the exhaustion of the day’s events finally caught up with us and we fell into a deep slumber. Falling asleep under 1.5 million gallons of seawater in relative comfort was undoubtedly the highlight of the weekend, but the rest of the tour
Youngdoung Tenzin is living history of modern Tibet. The Chinese government on Dec. 22 last year sanctioned him along with 19 other Canadians who were associated with the Canada Tibet Committee and the Uighur Rights Advocacy Project. A former political chair of the Canadian Tibetan Association of Ontario and community outreach manager for the Canada Tibet Committee, he is now a lecturer and researcher in Environmental Chemistry at the University of Toronto. “I was born into a nomadic Tibetan family in Tibet,” he says. “I came to India in 1999, when I was 11. I even met [His Holiness] the 14th the Dalai
Following the rollercoaster ride of 2025, next year is already shaping up to be dramatic. The ongoing constitutional crises and the nine-in-one local elections are already dominating the landscape. The constitutional crises are the ones to lose sleep over. Though much business is still being conducted, crucial items such as next year’s budget, civil servant pensions and the proposed eight-year NT$1.25 trillion (approx US$40 billion) special defense budget are still being contested. There are, however, two glimmers of hope. One is that the legally contested move by five of the eight grand justices on the Constitutional Court’s ad hoc move
Stepping off the busy through-road at Yongan Market Station, lights flashing, horns honking, I turn down a small side street and into the warm embrace of my favorite hole-in-the-wall gem, the Hoi An Banh Mi shop (越南會安麵包), red flags and yellow lanterns waving outside. “Little sister, we were wondering where you’ve been, we haven’t seen you in ages!” the owners call out with a smile. It’s been seven days. The restaurant is run by Huang Jin-chuan (黃錦泉), who is married to a local, and her little sister Eva, who helps out on weekends, having also moved to New Taipei
RSS