Invasive species are a problem throughout the world, and Taiwan is no exception. Non-native organisms have a number of negative impacts on the environment. They may drive native species to extinction by predation, by introducing new diseases or parasites or by outcompeting them for food or water. Invasive plants have been known to alter soil chemistry — making it inhospitable for native plants — or regional fire regimes, resulting in wildfires that are more frequent or intense.
Exotic and noxious species are a worry even for those humans who don’t value biodiversity. Invasive pests have decimated farming and forestry. Some species are a direct threat to human health because they spread diseases through bites and stings.
Most people are aware that certain species don’t belong here. The golden apple snail (Pomacea canaliculata) is one well-known invasive, the African Sacred Ibis (Threskiornis aethiopicus) is another.
Photo: TT file photo
But not so many people have heard of Mikania micrantha, sometimes called mile-a-minute vine. This perennial can grow at a rate of 10cm per day, wrapping itself around trees and smothering them until they perish due to a lack of sunlight. Earlier this year, volunteers supported by the AUO Foundation (友達永續基金會) endeavored to remove this perennial from a stretch of the Siaoli Creek (霄裡溪), close to the Taoyuan-Hsinchu County border.
According to a 2023 tally, 243 invasive species have gained footholds in Taiwan. Among them are the red imported fire ant (Solenopsis invicta), which reached the island in 2003, and the Louisiana crawfish (Procambarus clarkii). The latter’s burrowing behavior disrupts aquatic ecosystems and damages agriculture, but at least certain native birds seem to find it tasty.
A 2019 assessment of invasive herpetofauna concluded that 12 species (three frog species, one kind of turtle and nine lizard species) have established stable, invasive populations; five other species were described as having “a controversial invasion status,” while 14 more were dubbed “high risk” as they’re often seen in pet shops or have a tendency to escape.
Photo: Steven Crook
There’s some disagreement as to which non-native creatures should be prioritized, however. The government “continues to overlook the need to reduce feral cat and dog populations, despite Academia Sinica having listed them as invasive species,” says Lee Ko-Huan (李閣桓), a Taiwanese behavioral ecologist and lead author of the 2019 assessment.
FOUR-LEGGED THREATS
In Australia, where Lee is a postdoctoral fellow, cats are classified as an invasive species. Culling programs have been implemented to control their populations. In most of the country, releasing feral cats back to the environment, even after neutering, is illegal.
Photo: Tsai Tsung-hsien, Taipei Times
On Nov. 10 last year, at a march in Taipei organized by Walk for Wildlife (為野生動物而走), activists demanded: better management of Taiwan’s stray cats and dogs, especially around biodiversity hotspots; a reevaluation of TNR (trap-neuter-return) programs, because even neutered animals bring about considerable ecological disruption if released into their original habitats; and better education to promote responsible pet ownership.
As reported in this newspaper (“Four-legged friends?” March 27, 2024), feral dogs are a particular threat to Taiwan’s birds, leopard cats and pangolins.
Lee believes Taiwan can learn from other countries when it comes to long-term policy planning and setting goals for managing invasive species.
Photo courtesy of AUO
“The Australian government, for example, has demonstrated a long-standing commitment to invasive species management, something that’s still lacking in Taiwan,” he says.
The Rodent Management Team at the Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization (CSIRO) — Australia’s national science agency — has received industry funding over the past 13 years.
“Research spans behavioral ecology to bait efficacy, all contributing to improved mouse population management in agriculture. In contrast, Taiwan does not have the same level of industry-backed funding for research on invasive species and their management,” Lee says.
Photo: Huang Chien-hao, Taipei Times
CSIRO scientists played a central role in one of the world’s best-known campaigns against invasive animals: The intentional introduction in 1950 of myxomatosis to reduce Australia’s feral rabbit population.
SCIENCE NOT CASH
Lee says that offering cash rewards to the general public — which is how the county governments of Chiayi and Pingtung have encouraged people to hunt down common green iguanas (Iguana iguana) — “has proven ineffective in managing invasive populations.”
Photo courtesy of Jhongshuei Branch Office, Niouzhou Lake District Public Works Office
While culling conducted by professional hunters has successfully controlled populations of the African sacred ibis, this approach isn’t enough for species “with high reproductive potential, such as the spot-legged tree frog (Polypedates megacephalus),” he explains.
Lee thinks city and county-level agriculture and animal-protection units would get better results if they collaborated more closely with researchers to develop effective removal strategies, like their counterparts in South Korea.
In South Korea, Lee was involved in a project that led to the design and deployment of an acoustic trap to catch invasive American bullfrogs. The trap replayed the call of an attractive male, which the scientists hoped would lure both females searching for a mate and males eager to fight off a rival. However, the capture rate during the study period was low.
Photo: Steven Crook
“Although the acoustic traps didn’t perform as we expected, we wouldn’t have known this without conducting research,” Lee says.
While expressing confidence that “technological solutions can make a significant difference,” Lee says that, so far, biocontrol solutions like myxomatosis have been the most cost-effective solution.
TECH POSSIBILITIES
One of the options outlined in a 2020 technology-focused report by Australia’s Center for Invasive Species Solutions is the use of unmanned aerial vehicles (UAVs) to detect animal heat signatures and monitor native and pest populations in real time.
According to the Forestry and Nature Conservation Agency’s (FANCA) “Invasive Alien Species Removal, Control and Restoration Plan 2025-2028,” the authorities have been using UAVs to survey the distribution of Mimosa pigra L between the Jinlun Creek (金崙溪) and the Anshuo Creek (安朔溪) in Taitung County. Stopping this creeping annual (a native of South America known as giant sensitive tree) from spreading northward is a priority for the agency.
The plan describes Mimosa pigra L as being one of a number of “increasingly serious invasive alien plants…which are strategically removed to enhance forest health and vegetation coverage, thereby protecting Taiwan’s local ecology and biodiversity.”
FANCA says that, in 2023 and last year, its Taitung branch eradicated 48.21 hectares of Mimosa pigra L.
The agency’s 2025-2028 plan, much of which is devoted to the fight against the white leadtree (Leucaena leucocephala) in the Hengchun Peninsula, also mentions the use of remote sensing technology to monitor distribution trends of invasive and native plants and assess the effectiveness of removal efforts. As this kind of technology becomes more versatile and more affordable, controlling invasive species will require fewer boots on the ground — a clear advantage where fragile ecosystems are concerned.
Steven Crook, the author or co-author of four books about Taiwan, has been following environmental issues since he arrived in the country in 1991. He drives a hybrid and carries his own chopsticks. The views expressed here are his own.
The breakwater stretches out to sea from the sprawling Kaohsiung port in southern Taiwan. Normally, it’s crowded with massive tankers ferrying liquefied natural gas from Qatar to be stored in the bulbous white tanks that dot the shoreline. These are not normal times, though, and not a single shipment from Qatar has docked at the Yongan terminal since early March after the Strait of Hormuz was shuttered. The suspension has provided a realistic preview of a potential Chinese blockade, a move that would throttle an economy anchored by the world’s most advanced and power-hungry semiconductor industry. It is a stark reminder of
May 11 to May 17 Traversing the southern slopes of the Yushan Range in 1931, Japanese naturalist Tadao Kano knew he was approaching the last swath of Taiwan still beyond colonial control. The “vast, unknown territory,” protected by the “fierce” Bunun headman Dahu Ali, was “filled with an utterly endless jungle that choked the mountains and valleys,” Kano wrote. He noted how the group had “refused to submit to the measures of our authorities and entrenched themselves deep in these mountains … living a free existence spent chasing deer in the morning and seeking serow in the evening,” even describing them as
The last couple of weeks spectators in Taiwan and abroad have been treated to a remarkable display of infighting in the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) over the supplementary defense budget. The party has split into two camps, one supporting an NT$800 billion special defense budget and one supporting an NT$380 billion budget with additional funding contingent on receiving letters of acceptance (LOA) from the US. Recent media reports have said that the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) is leaning toward the latter position. President William Lai (賴清德) has proposed NT$1.25 trillion for purchases of US arms and for development of domestic weapons
As a different column was being written, the big news dropped that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) announced that negotiations within his caucus, with legislative speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) of the KMT, party Chair Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chair Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) had produced a compromise special military budget proposal. On Thursday morning, prior to meeting with Cheng over a lunch of beef noodles, Lu reiterated her support for a budget of NT$800 or NT$900 billion — but refused to comment after the meeting. Right after Fu’s
RSS