Could Taiwan’s democracy be at risk? There is a lot of apocalyptic commentary right now suggesting that this is the case, but it is always a conspiracy by the other guys — our side is firmly on the side of protecting democracy and always has been, unlike them!
The situation is nowhere near that bleak — yet. The concern is that the power struggle between the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and their now effectively pan-blue allies the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) intensifies to the point where democratic functions start to break down.
Both sides are taking big political risks that could turn off middle-of-the-road voters, especially the pan-blue side. On the other hand, they are revving up their voter bases, which may prove more valuable if they succeed.
Photo: Liu Hsin-de, Taipei Times
THE ‘GREAT RECALL’
In May last year, the KMT and TPP passed legislation to give the Legislative Yuan more powers constitutionally allotted to the Judicial Yuan and the Ministry of Justice. Tens of thousands of people, alarmed by the attempted power grab and the national security implications of handing judicial powers to the legislature to force government officials to submit to questioning poured out into the streets in a movement that came to be called the “Bluebird Action” (青鳥行動) movement.
The Constitutional Court struck down those provisions and the Bluebirds went home.
Photo: Chung Li-hua, Taipei Times
Then the KMT and TPP passed a law restoring the pre-2022 standard of requiring two-thirds of the justices to rule a law unconstitutional — rather than a simple majority — and required that 10 of the 15 justices be present. They then voted down all seven of President William Lai’s (賴清德) nominees for the court, leaving the court with only eight justices.
They then cut the budget by 6.6 percent and froze large chunks of what remained. To get those funds unfrozen, the government must submit to grilling by the legislature as to why they need the money.
DPP caucus convener Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) has acted particularly outraged and said that the DPP would launch recall campaigns against 41 district lawmakers in the KMT caucus. The eight TPP legislators were voted in on the party list, so none can be recalled.
Photo: Huang Ming-tang, Taipei Times
President Lai, in his role as party chairman, declared that the DPP would not in fact be launching any recall campaigns, but “respects” any civic groups that chose to do so, and many have.
The pan-blue side has retaliated with recall campaigns against the DPP. Officially, the KMT is not behind them, but the KMT Youth League is openly organizing them.
At last count, 31 recalls of anti-pan-blue and 13 anti-pan-green campaigns had submitted signatures to pass stage one in the three-stage process, but more are coming in. In theory, 79 of the 113 legislative seats could face recall campaigns, though it is unlikely 79 would pass stage one, let alone get to a stage three public vote.
PARTISAN VIEWPOINTS
To deep blues, the recall campaigns are an undemocratic movement by Lai’s New Tide faction to reimpose the party-state enjoyed by former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). Hardcore TPP supporters also believe that Lai and his DPP regime are colluding with prosecutors to weaponize the legal system to “crucify” — as party chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) recently put it — party founder Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) by framing him with trumped-up corruption charges.
They justify their actions as necessary to protect democracy from an undemocratic “green terror” by reigning in the power of the executive branch.
There is no evidence of President Lai acting unconstitutionally or of alleged collusion to frame Ko. They do have a point that their “great recall” (大罷免) campaign to overturn voting results from a year earlier is not typical democratic behavior.
Meanwhile, outrage and panic is coming from pan-green supporters who are accusing the pan-blues of paralyzing the government, provoking a constitutional crisis to seize more power, slashing funding for cultural programs that promote a localized culture and weakening the military — all to the benefit of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
This appeared in a Taipei Times editorial last week: “Budget cuts like this year’s are meant to destroy the nation and bring Taiwanese to ruin. The only realistic solution is to use recalls to fire the preposterous legislators who have no qualms about harming their own country to mislead others.”
I am pan-green, so unsurprisingly initially my take was similar to the above. If the pan-blue bloc does not back down, then all those worries above could well come to pass — a result no doubt some in the KMT caucus want.
BACK FROM THE BRINK?
Watching the behavior of President Lai, either he thinks that the KMT and TPP are bluffing and playing hardball, or he is letting them kneecap themselves.
Despite talk of challenging the Constitutional Court law before it became law under the old system, it did not happen and Lai signed the bill into law. Perhaps there is some procedural reason the law was not challenged — that there was too little time to deliberate perhaps — but as far as I know no attempt to challenge it.
It is also curious that after Lai’s candidates for the court were shot down last year, he has not nominated any new ones. Either he wants the pan-blues to create a constitutional crisis that will be blamed on them, or he is waiting to include this in future negotiations.
He has also continued to push for budget negotiations, and with his premier has convinced legislative speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to reconvene cross-caucus budget negotiations, but will KMT caucus convener Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) and TPP convener Huang actually negotiate?
Both are saying they will not change their stance. Though known for changing his positions significantly over time, in the short term Huang is stubborn and is not likely to budge unless the KMT does first.
Whether Fu will or not depends on his own aims, pressure from party higher-ups and from within his caucus. Party higher-ups like party Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) and former President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) are likely to urge negotiations, but caucus firebrands like Jennifer Chen (陳玉珍) and Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) and will likely urge standing firm.
Fu’s aims are an open question, but his recent behavior — and previous concerning ties to China — suggests he will only negotiate under pressure. There are some budget items cut or frozen that are unpopular with pan-blue supporters, leaving the door open for some negotiations.
Strategically it is in the KMT’s interest to back down and enter into grand negotiations that include the Constitutional Court issue. It is not necessarily in the TPP’s interest, whose lawmakers are safe.
The KMT’s problem is they have infuriated and frightened the pan-green base to such a degree that a fair number of the recall campaigns have a chance at succeeding because the minimum thresholds to successfully recall a lawmaker are low and pan-greens are currently highly motivated to make them happen.
Is this what President Lai is maneuvering for? Possibly. One thing we do know from the 2019 DPP presidential primary is that he is capable of political ruthlessness.
Donovan’s Deep Dives is a regular column by Courtney Donovan Smith (石東文) who writes in-depth analysis on everything about Taiwan’s political scene and geopolitics. Donovan is also the central Taiwan correspondent at ICRT FM100 Radio News, co-publisher of Compass Magazine, co-founder Taiwan Report (report.tw) and former chair of the Taichung American Chamber of Commerce. Follow him on X: @donovan_smith.
Recently the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and its Mini-Me partner in the legislature, the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), have been arguing that construction of chip fabs in the US by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) is little more than stripping Taiwan of its assets. For example, KMT Legislative Caucus First Deputy Secretary-General Lin Pei-hsiang (林沛祥) in January said that “This is not ‘reciprocal cooperation’ ... but a substantial hollowing out of our country.” Similarly, former TPP Chair Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) contended it constitutes “selling Taiwan out to the United States.” The two pro-China parties are proposing a bill that
March 9 to March 15 “This land produced no horses,” Qing Dynasty envoy Yu Yung-ho (郁永河) observed when he visited Taiwan in 1697. He didn’t mean that there were no horses at all; it was just difficult to transport them across the sea and raise them in the hot and humid climate. “Although 10,000 soldiers were stationed here, the camps had fewer than 1,000 horses,” Yu added. Starting from the Dutch in the 1600s, each foreign regime brought horses to Taiwan. But they remained rare animals, typically only owned by the government or
It starts out as a heartwarming clip. A young girl, clearly delighted to be in Tokyo, beams as she makes a peace sign to the camera. Seconds later, she is shoved to the ground from behind by a woman wearing a surgical mask. The assailant doesn’t skip a beat, striding out of shot of the clip filmed by the girl’s mother. This was no accidental clash of shoulders in a crowded place, but one of the most visible examples of a spate of butsukari otoko — “bumping man” — shoving incidents in Japan that experts attribute to a combination of gender
Last month, media outlets including the BBC World Service and Bloomberg reported that China’s greenhouse gas emissions are currently flat or falling, and that the economic giant appears to be on course to comfortably meet Beijing’s stated goal that total emissions will peak no later than 2030. China is by far and away the world’s biggest emitter of greenhouse gases, generating more carbon dioxide than the US and the EU combined. As the BBC pointed out in their Feb. 12 report, “what happens in China literally could change the world’s weather.” Any drop in total emissions is good news, of course. By
RSS