Could Taiwan’s democracy be at risk? There is a lot of apocalyptic commentary right now suggesting that this is the case, but it is always a conspiracy by the other guys — our side is firmly on the side of protecting democracy and always has been, unlike them!
The situation is nowhere near that bleak — yet. The concern is that the power struggle between the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and their now effectively pan-blue allies the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and the ruling Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) intensifies to the point where democratic functions start to break down.
Both sides are taking big political risks that could turn off middle-of-the-road voters, especially the pan-blue side. On the other hand, they are revving up their voter bases, which may prove more valuable if they succeed.
Photo: Liu Hsin-de, Taipei Times
THE ‘GREAT RECALL’
In May last year, the KMT and TPP passed legislation to give the Legislative Yuan more powers constitutionally allotted to the Judicial Yuan and the Ministry of Justice. Tens of thousands of people, alarmed by the attempted power grab and the national security implications of handing judicial powers to the legislature to force government officials to submit to questioning poured out into the streets in a movement that came to be called the “Bluebird Action” (青鳥行動) movement.
The Constitutional Court struck down those provisions and the Bluebirds went home.
Photo: Chung Li-hua, Taipei Times
Then the KMT and TPP passed a law restoring the pre-2022 standard of requiring two-thirds of the justices to rule a law unconstitutional — rather than a simple majority — and required that 10 of the 15 justices be present. They then voted down all seven of President William Lai’s (賴清德) nominees for the court, leaving the court with only eight justices.
They then cut the budget by 6.6 percent and froze large chunks of what remained. To get those funds unfrozen, the government must submit to grilling by the legislature as to why they need the money.
DPP caucus convener Ker Chien-ming (柯建銘) has acted particularly outraged and said that the DPP would launch recall campaigns against 41 district lawmakers in the KMT caucus. The eight TPP legislators were voted in on the party list, so none can be recalled.
Photo: Huang Ming-tang, Taipei Times
President Lai, in his role as party chairman, declared that the DPP would not in fact be launching any recall campaigns, but “respects” any civic groups that chose to do so, and many have.
The pan-blue side has retaliated with recall campaigns against the DPP. Officially, the KMT is not behind them, but the KMT Youth League is openly organizing them.
At last count, 31 recalls of anti-pan-blue and 13 anti-pan-green campaigns had submitted signatures to pass stage one in the three-stage process, but more are coming in. In theory, 79 of the 113 legislative seats could face recall campaigns, though it is unlikely 79 would pass stage one, let alone get to a stage three public vote.
PARTISAN VIEWPOINTS
To deep blues, the recall campaigns are an undemocratic movement by Lai’s New Tide faction to reimpose the party-state enjoyed by former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文). Hardcore TPP supporters also believe that Lai and his DPP regime are colluding with prosecutors to weaponize the legal system to “crucify” — as party chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) recently put it — party founder Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) by framing him with trumped-up corruption charges.
They justify their actions as necessary to protect democracy from an undemocratic “green terror” by reigning in the power of the executive branch.
There is no evidence of President Lai acting unconstitutionally or of alleged collusion to frame Ko. They do have a point that their “great recall” (大罷免) campaign to overturn voting results from a year earlier is not typical democratic behavior.
Meanwhile, outrage and panic is coming from pan-green supporters who are accusing the pan-blues of paralyzing the government, provoking a constitutional crisis to seize more power, slashing funding for cultural programs that promote a localized culture and weakening the military — all to the benefit of the Chinese Communist Party (CCP).
This appeared in a Taipei Times editorial last week: “Budget cuts like this year’s are meant to destroy the nation and bring Taiwanese to ruin. The only realistic solution is to use recalls to fire the preposterous legislators who have no qualms about harming their own country to mislead others.”
I am pan-green, so unsurprisingly initially my take was similar to the above. If the pan-blue bloc does not back down, then all those worries above could well come to pass — a result no doubt some in the KMT caucus want.
BACK FROM THE BRINK?
Watching the behavior of President Lai, either he thinks that the KMT and TPP are bluffing and playing hardball, or he is letting them kneecap themselves.
Despite talk of challenging the Constitutional Court law before it became law under the old system, it did not happen and Lai signed the bill into law. Perhaps there is some procedural reason the law was not challenged — that there was too little time to deliberate perhaps — but as far as I know no attempt to challenge it.
It is also curious that after Lai’s candidates for the court were shot down last year, he has not nominated any new ones. Either he wants the pan-blues to create a constitutional crisis that will be blamed on them, or he is waiting to include this in future negotiations.
He has also continued to push for budget negotiations, and with his premier has convinced legislative speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) to reconvene cross-caucus budget negotiations, but will KMT caucus convener Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) and TPP convener Huang actually negotiate?
Both are saying they will not change their stance. Though known for changing his positions significantly over time, in the short term Huang is stubborn and is not likely to budge unless the KMT does first.
Whether Fu will or not depends on his own aims, pressure from party higher-ups and from within his caucus. Party higher-ups like party Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) and former President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) are likely to urge negotiations, but caucus firebrands like Jennifer Chen (陳玉珍) and Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯) and will likely urge standing firm.
Fu’s aims are an open question, but his recent behavior — and previous concerning ties to China — suggests he will only negotiate under pressure. There are some budget items cut or frozen that are unpopular with pan-blue supporters, leaving the door open for some negotiations.
Strategically it is in the KMT’s interest to back down and enter into grand negotiations that include the Constitutional Court issue. It is not necessarily in the TPP’s interest, whose lawmakers are safe.
The KMT’s problem is they have infuriated and frightened the pan-green base to such a degree that a fair number of the recall campaigns have a chance at succeeding because the minimum thresholds to successfully recall a lawmaker are low and pan-greens are currently highly motivated to make them happen.
Is this what President Lai is maneuvering for? Possibly. One thing we do know from the 2019 DPP presidential primary is that he is capable of political ruthlessness.
Donovan’s Deep Dives is a regular column by Courtney Donovan Smith (石東文) who writes in-depth analysis on everything about Taiwan’s political scene and geopolitics. Donovan is also the central Taiwan correspondent at ICRT FM100 Radio News, co-publisher of Compass Magazine, co-founder Taiwan Report (report.tw) and former chair of the Taichung American Chamber of Commerce. Follow him on X: @donovan_smith.
The primaries for this year’s nine-in-one local elections in November began early in this election cycle, starting last autumn. The local press has been full of tales of intrigue, betrayal, infighting and drama going back to the summer of 2024. This is not widely covered in the English-language press, and the nine-in-one elections are not well understood. The nine-in-one elections refer to the nine levels of local governments that go to the ballot, from the neighborhood and village borough chief level on up to the city mayor and county commissioner level. The main focus is on the 22 special municipality
Words of the Year are not just interesting, they are telling. They are language and attitude barometers that measure what a country sees as important. The trending vocabulary around AI last year reveals a stark divergence in what each society notices and responds to the technological shift. For the Anglosphere it’s fatigue. For China it’s ambition. For Taiwan, it’s pragmatic vigilance. In Taiwan’s annual “representative character” vote, “recall” (罷) took the top spot with over 15,000 votes, followed closely by “scam” (詐). While “recall” speaks to the island’s partisan deadlock — a year defined by legislative recall campaigns and a public exhausted
Hsu Pu-liao (許不了) never lived to see the premiere of his most successful film, The Clown and the Swan (小丑與天鵝, 1985). The movie, which starred Hsu, the “Taiwanese Charlie Chaplin,” outgrossed Jackie Chan’s Heart of Dragon (龍的心), earning NT$9.2 million at the local box office. Forty years after its premiere, the film has become the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute’s (TFAI) 100th restoration. “It is the only one of Hsu’s films whose original negative survived,” says director Kevin Chu (朱延平), one of Taiwan’s most commercially successful
In the 2010s, the Communist Party of China (CCP) began cracking down on Christian churches. Media reports said at the time that various versions of Protestant Christianity were likely the fastest growing religions in the People’s Republic of China (PRC). The crackdown was part of a campaign that in turn was part of a larger movement to bring religion under party control. For the Protestant churches, “the government’s aim has been to force all churches into the state-controlled organization,” according to a 2023 article in Christianity Today. That piece was centered on Wang Yi (王怡), the fiery, charismatic pastor of the
RSS