Last week the story of the giant illegal crater dug in Kaohsiung’s Meinong District (美濃) emerged into the public consciousness. The site was used for sand and gravel extraction, and then filled with construction waste. Locals referred to it sardonically as the “Meinong Grand Canyon,” according to media reports, because it was 2 hectares in length and 10 meters deep. The land involved included both state-owned and local farm land.
Local media said that the site had generated NT$300 million in profits, against fines of a few million and the loss of some excavators.
OFFICIAL CORRUPTION?
Photo courtesy of the Ciaotou District Prosecutor’s Office
The site had been seized in March of this year, according to the Chinese-language United Daily News, with fines issued previously in January. However, the prosecutor’s office launched an investigation only last month, suggesting that the site had continued operations. Indeed, a local Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) politician said that she had been alerted to it by complaints from locals in July, though critics noted that she waited until after the investigation to appear at the site.
It is difficult to imagine how this site was able to function without official corruption. Land development is widely monitored by satellite. A few years ago a friend of mine hung a tarp over his picnic table on the east coast and the land office had people out within days to see what his “illegal structure” was. They had spotted the tarp on a satellite image. Moreover, the local Economic Development Bureau said that since 2022 it had found numerous pits in the Meinong area backfilled with construction waste, meaning that its officials were criss-crossing the area. Residents had long complained about the noise and damage caused by the machinery and trucks. The complaints, like so many others, had fallen on deaf ears.
Last week also saw another round in the ongoing struggle over water supplies to the subsidy-guzzling, tariff-protected Mailiao Industrial Complex in Yunlin, operated by Formosa Plastics. The ostensible policy goal of the massive petrochemical complex was to make Taiwan self-sufficient in petrochemical products.
Photo: TT file photo
The government originally intended that the site was to develop its own independent water supply, but that was never carried out. Instead, for 30 years the petrochemical plants have drawn 100 million tons of water annually from the Jhuoshuei River (濁水溪), at prices of around a third of normal water market prices (the entire Hsinchu science park demands around 52 million tons of water annually).
Furthermore, as a nifty discussion of the issues at News and Market observes, the government also poured millions of taxpayer dollars into constructing the Jiji Weir (集集攔河堰) in Nantou County and its associated pipelines for Mailiao, which it then uses to provide the company below-cost water.
The ruthless plundering of the river’s water to subsidize the complex has forced local farmers to mine groundwater, even though the river no longer replenishes local aquifers. This results in large-scale subsidence in the area (13 of 20 townships have subsidence problems), and the burning of fossil fuels to drive the pumps. Though it has no water rights during the dry season from February to May, it continues to draw water from the river, purchased from the Ministry of Economic Affairs’ Bureau of Industrial Parks.
Photo courtesy of the Ciaotou District Prosecutor’s Office
By law, farmers have the highest water priority. A 2016 journal article on water use per capita in Yunlin observed that “Yunlin County faces more water resource-related difficulties than any other county in Taiwan.”
A desalination plant to supply the petrochemical complex is supposed to begin operation this month. It had been slated for completion in 2022, but Formosa Plastics asked for three extensions until April next year. The company was fined a pitiful NT$300,000 by the Ministry of Environment. However, environmental groups remain skeptical that the plant will generate the planned 100,000 tons of water per day, and accuse Formosa Plastics of dragging its feet in constructing the facility. They also point out that as long as the plant can obtain cheap water from the river, it has no incentive to complete the desalination facility.
Finally, last week environmental groups also criticized the Ministry of Environment after it released the list of newly appointed Environmental Impact Assessment (EIA) committee members. Of the 14 appointees, half of whom were carried over from the previous term, nine have an environmental engineering background, and one has a background in ocean engineering, Air Clean Taiwan founder Yeh Guang-perng (葉光芃) observed in a Taipei Times report. Only two of the appointees had backgrounds in ecology, the fewest in committee history, Taiwan Academy of Ecology director Yang Kuo-cheng (楊國禎) added. The groups also complained that several of the appointees were known for backing controversial projects and turning a deaf ear to complaints.
The common thread to all these stories is the same: official indifference to environmental destruction, apparent collusion between businesses and government, especially local government, and minimal or complete evasion of oversight by firms. All over long periods of time, across different administrations and political parties. Anyone who reads the news can see that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has largely continued, rather than ended, longstanding extractive policies that originated under the KMT.
The people who live with this government-approved and facilitated looting of local wealth and resources are largely residents of long-time DPP areas. Yunlin is a DPP fief. The reason the south is pan-Green is because during the years of KMT rule it was treated as a colony of Taipei, its resources extracted and the wealth of its farmers transferred to the KMT government. Indeed, former president Lee Teng-hui’s (李登輝) doctoral thesis in agricultural economics at Cornell explores the extractive agricultural policies of the KMT government and presents an implicit critique of its rule as even more extractive than Japanese colonial rule. The result has been two generations of farmers in the south who don’t vote KMT at the national level.
LOSING VOTERS
All that could easily be lost. Why did the DPP see many longtime voters switching to the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) in the last election? It has become a center-right establishment party in cahoots with business. The list of appointees to the EIA committee mentioned above are a formal signal of its commitment to big business.
Another nine-in-one election is inbound. It should be obvious that the DPP needs to swing back towards the combination of social justice and economic nationalism that drove the party’s incorporation of voters for two decades after 1996. If the DPP wants to remain in power, it needs to go back to its roots.
Even more urgently, the People’s Republic of China (PRC) threat looms. Recent research by Wu Wen-chin (吳文欽) of the Academia Sinica Institute of Political Science shows that as Taiwan’s income inequality worsens, citizens’ willingness to fight for the nation declines.
The DPP’s rightward drift is impairing the party’s ability to win elections by chasing off voters, while reducing Taiwanese’ attachment to their country. Not just bad politics, it is a threat to the nation’s security.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
Last week the government announced that by year’s end Taiwan will have the highest density of anti-ship missiles in the world. Its inventory could exceed 1,400, or enough for the opening two hours of an invasion from the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Snark aside, it sounds impressive. But an important piece is missing. Lost in all the “dialogues” and “debates” and “discussions” whose sole purpose is simply to dawdle and delay is what the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) alternative special defense budget proposal means for the defense of Taiwan. It is a betrayal of both Taiwan and the US. IT’S
Paul Thomas Anderson’s “One Battle After Another” was crowned best picture at the 98th Academy Awards, handing Hollywood’s top honor to a comic, multi-generational American saga of political resistance. The ceremony Sunday, which also saw Michael B. Jordan win best actor and “Sinners” cinematographer Autumn Durald Arkapaw make Oscar history as the first female director of photography to win the award, was a long-in-coming coronation for Anderson, a San Fernando Valley native who made his first short at age 18 and has been one of America’s most lionized filmmakers for decades. Before Sunday, Anderson had never won an Oscar. But “One Battle
In Kaohsiung’s Indigenous People’s Park (原住民主題公園), the dance group Push Hands is training. All its members are from Taiwan’s indigenous community, but their vibe is closer to that of a modern, urban hip-hop posse. MIXING CULTURES “The name Push Hands comes from the idea of pushing away tradition to expand our culture,” says Ljakuon (洪濬嚴), the 44-year-old founder and main teacher of the dance group. This is what makes Push Hands unique: while retaining their Aboriginal roots, and even reconnecting with them, they are adamant about doing something modern. Ljakuon started the group 20 years ago, initially with the sole intention of doing hip-hop dancing.
You would never believe Yancheng District (鹽埕) used to be a salt field. Today, it is a bustling, artsy, Kowloon-ish “old town” of Kaohsiung — full of neon lights, small shops, scooters and street food. Two hundred years ago, before Japanese occupiers developed a shipping powerhouse around it, Yancheng was a flat triangle where seawater was captured and dried to collect salt. This is what local art galleries are revealing during the first edition of the Yancheng Arts Festival. Shen Yu-rung (沈裕融), the main curator, says: “We chose the connection with salt as a theme. The ocean is still very near, just a
RSS