Big changes are afoot in global politics, which that are having a big impact on the global order, look set to continue and have the potential to completely reshape it. In my previous column we examined the three macro megatrends impacting the entire planet: Technology, demographics and climate.
Below are international trends that are social, political, geopolitical and economic. While there will be some impact on Taiwan from all four, it is likely the first two will be minor, but the second two will likely change the course of Taiwan’s history.
The re-election of Donald Trump as president of the US embodies many of the big trends shaping the future. He is part of an international populist movement that shares similarities with counterparts around the world, from Hungary to the Philippines, India to Turkey and the MAGA and Brexit movements.
Photo: Wang Kuan-jen, Taipei Times
These movements vary somewhat according to local conditions and culture, but could such a movement arise here?
‘LITTLE SPROUT’ FRUSTRATION
Listening carefully to post-election Trump voter comments among voters from blocs not normally associated with MAGA, one theme is consistent: They were frustrated. Some were frustrated by inflation, others harbored a frustration with the “coastal elites” and government pushing a social agenda, young people were frustrated at the sense that opportunity is getting further and further from their grasp and young men were frustrated with a sense of powerlessness and uselessness.
Photo: EPA-EFE
Some of these issues have animated the “little sprout” (小草) movement backing the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and its chairman, the currently incarcerated Ko Wen-je (柯文哲). It is not coincidental that the cries of bias against the state-financed, English-language TaiwanPlus television channel over the correct statement that Trump is a “convicted felon” were pushed heavily by the TPP.
Regardless of whether Trump, and other politicians of his ilk, can actually solve any or all of these issues, they always claim a mandate to shake up the system. Ko originally sold himself as a non-establishment pragmatic, cut-through red tape type of guy, but sounded more anti-establishment in the presidential campaign, making dark insinuations against the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and especially its New Tide faction. Watch carefully to see if he picks up more of a strongman persona going forward.
The “little sprouts” are mostly frustrated young people, especially young men. The lack of affordable housing and slow-rising incomes are breeding frustration. Michael Turton’s column “Taiwan’s emerging ‘polycrisis’” published on Nov. 5 explores this in depth.
Photo: AFP
HOW TAIWANESE ARE DIFFERENT
There are three elements of the international populist movements that are not likely to have as much impact here. One is that Taiwanese do not take democracy for granted and are proud of having achieved it, and have integrated being democratic into Taiwanese identity.
Selling a strongman persona might work for a segment of society, but a minority. The mere fear that Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) might hold such thoughts in his heart led to a landslide defeat in his presidential run.
Han stated he had no such intentions, but his open nostalgia for the authoritarian era economy and cultural touchstones raised suspicions. Most of his supporters did not doubt his commitment to democracy, and only a minority wanted to return to authoritarianism.
Another is that while not entirely without hiccups or opponents, social change in Taiwan has been far less adversarial and contentious than in many countries. Overseas there are “culture wars” but in Taiwan they are more like “culture skirmishes.”
Taiwanese culture more commonly moves forward in small steps over the long haul rather than in rapid swings and convulsions as is more common in the West. Exceptions occur such as when the Constitutional Court weighs in, but even then society more or less just moves along with the changes.
In some ways Taiwan is relatively liberal, in others conservative. The percentage of women in elected office has risen above 40 percent and the percentage of women in executive positions is also fairly high by global standards, and much higher than other East Asian nations.
Support for marriage equality in polling is high and there was widespread pride when Taiwanese-American drag queen Nymphia Wind (妮妃雅) won RuPaul’s Drag Race. On the other hand, support is scant for legalizing marijuana, ending the death penalty or legal euthanasia.
The third is that while it does exist, science denial is relatively rare and largely confined to the elderly sharing memes in LINE groups. The anti-vaxxers and climate deniers in the international populist movement would not likely get much traction in Taiwan. Taiwanese are proud that students here rank among the highest in science and math testing worldwide.
WHERE TAIWANESE COULD BE SIMILAR
While a full-scale movement like MAGA is unlikely, elements similar to it have already appeared and a movement like the “little sprouts” or something new could build on that — but only to a point. The existing elements have some room to grow and there are some things that Taiwanese could adopt from abroad.
While science conspiracies do not get a lot of traction, political ones often do. As explored in my column “Ko as ‘sacrificial martyr’: the cult-like rhetoric of the TPP and its supporters on Nov. 2, starting in the first week of September conspiracies and cult-like rhetoric moved from the fringes of the “little sprout” movement to the mainstream of the TPP.
To them, Ko is a victim of political persecution. It will be interesting to see if Ko, when released from jail, tries to capitalize on it by claiming martyr status and monetize it like Trump did by selling merchandise adorned with his mug shot. Already Ko followers have likened him to Nelson Mandela, a Boddisatva and called him a “martyr for democracy.”
At the deep ends of the pan-green and especially the pan-blue movements conspiracies abound. A popular one shared by both is that former president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and the London School of Economics — for reasons never clearly explained — colluded to fake her thesis.
Another element that could play well with some is nativism. This can be played both at the international level with distrust of the US, and towards foreigners locally.
If the US under Trump begins to act erratically and making big demands of Taiwan, it will play right into the segment of the population that already thinks the US only helps Taiwan to rip off Taiwanese with extravagant arms deals. It did not help that RTX (formerly Raytheon) was recently caught inflating their prices in arm sales to Taiwan, though fortunately it was the US government that caught them and ordered them to pay NT$52 billion to Taiwan for doing so.
On the local level there are over 800,000 people classified as “migrant workers” and when foreign-born spouses, foreign students and white-collar workers are included, there are over a million foreigners in Taiwan. So far what little backlash there has been is concerns over foreigners depressing wages or “stealing jobs,” but traditionally Taiwanese viewed themselves in ethnic and ethnonationalistic terms and this is a well that could be tapped into.
Frustration is fueling anti-immigrant hostility abroad and it could here.
Donovan’s Deep Dives is a regular column by Courtney Donovan Smith (石東文) who writes in-depth analysis on everything about Taiwan’s political scene and geopolitics. Donovan is also the central Taiwan correspondent at ICRT FM100 Radio News, co-publisher of Compass Magazine, co-founder Taiwan Report (report.tw) and former chair of the Taichung American Chamber of Commerce. Follow him on X: @donovan_smith.
Last week, the government rejected a petition to amend the law that would allow permanent residents a path to citizenship. This was widely expected, but it came amid a flurry of negative trends about the future of the nation’s labor force. There was much ironic commentary on the juxtaposition of that decision with its idiotic, abusive reasoning with the urgent demand for labor across a wide range of fields. This demand was highlighted by the government’s plans for five NT$10 billion (US$307.6 million) funds to promote development in key fields, including artificial intelligence (AI), “smart” healthcare and green growth announced
It is dangerous to engage in business in China now, and those considering engaging with it should pay close attention to the example Taiwanese businesspeople are setting. Though way down from the heady days of Taiwanese investments in China two decades ago, a few hundred thousand Taiwanese continue to live, work and study there, but the numbers have been declining fast. As President William Lai (賴清德) pointed out approvingly to a visiting American Senate delegation, China accounted for 80 percent of the total overseas investment in 2011, but was reduced to just 11.4 percent last year. That is a big drop.
Dec 2 to Dec 8 It was the biggest heist in Taiwanese history at that time. In the afternoon of Dec. 7, 1982, two masked men armed with M16 assault rifles knocked out the driver of a United World Chinese Commercial Bank (世華銀行) security van, making away with NT$14 million (worth about NT$30 million today). The van had been parked behind a post office at Taipei’s Minsheng E Road when the robbers struck, and despite the post office being full of customers, nobody inside had noticed the brazen theft. “Criminals robbing a
Supplements are no cottage industry. Hawked by the likes of the Kardashian-Jenner clan, vitamin gummies have in recent years found popularity among millennials and zoomers, who are more receptive to supplements in the form of “powders, liquids and gummies” than older generations. Gwyneth Paltrow’s Goop — no stranger to dubious health trends — sells its own line of such supplements. On TikTok, influencers who shill multivitamin gummies — and more recently, vitamin patches resembling cutesy, colorful stickers or fine line tattoos — promise glowing skin, lush locks, energy boosts and better sleep. But if it’s real health benefits you’re after, you’re