President William Lai’s (賴清德) National Day speech was exactly what most of us expected. It was pleasant, full of keywords like “resilience” and “net zero” and lacked any trolling of the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Of course the word “Taiwan” popped up often, and Lai reiterated the longtime claim of his Democratic Progressive Party (DPP), a claim that now dates back 30 years on the pro-Taiwan side. But it was gentle. Indeed, it was possible to see the speech as conciliatory, leaving room for the PRC to make a gesture.
That may have been one of its purposes: if the PRC responds with its usual aggressive provocations, it will be visible to the world that no change in the vocabulary of the Taiwanese leadership, except “we submit,” will meet with a positive response from the PRC. A quietly strong speech exposes how the constant claim of the pro-PRC side, that there is a verbal formula that will produce a return to the status quo, is a pro-PRC lie intended to discredit the pro-Taiwan side.
The foreign press has been rather calm in its reporting of the speech. Both the US and the PRC issued boilerplate, the former calling on the PRC to behave itself, the latter blasting Lai as a “separatist.” Rush Doshi, who as Biden’s PRC man on the National Security Council from 2021 to this year, tweeted out that “Lai’s 10/10 speech was more restrained than his inaugural.”
Photo: Tu Chien-jung, Taipei Times
Doshi implied, like many other commentators, that the ball was in Beijing’s court.
“So the question now is whether Beijing wants to respond with escalation or its own restraint,” he said.
The well-known scholar Lev Nachman observed that while the focus would be on continuities between previous president Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) and Lai in their descriptions of Taiwan’s status, an important and often unnoticed continuity is “their emphasis on the need to address climate change and renewable energy.”
Photo: Tien Yu-hua, Taipei Times
This is critical, especially for a nation that puts out as much carbon dioxide as Taiwan does.
LAI AS CHEN SHUI-BIAN?
Like Tsai, Lai left the international media little it could use to insinuate that he was being provocative. While Tsai’s “measured” approach is generally discussed in the context of the PRC and the international security context, in fact she was trying to avoid being “ChenShuibianized” — treated as former DPP President Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) was by the international media, and turned into a madwoman who could declare independence at any moment.
Photo: Tien Yu-hua, Taipei Times
Although this risk waned as Tsai handled it well and Taiwan’s position in the world has changed, it has returned for Lai. His domestic opponents are hell-bent on turning him into the Second Coming of Chen, and they have deep links to scholars and finance moguls in the US who want to sell out Taiwan to the PRC. Even as Lai spoke, former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), who skipped the speech for the second straight year, was posting on Facebook that Lai was a “troublemaker.”
DOMESTIC VISION SAME OLD, SAME OLD
While the world parses Lai’s speech like Roman priests inspecting the guts of a sacrificial animal for “provocations” and suchlike, it’s important to note what was omitted when Lai switched to the domestic side.
Photo: Tien Yu-hua, Taipei Times
“We will redouble our efforts to combat fraud and fight housing speculation,” Lai said.
What efforts against housing speculation? All they had to do was change the tax system when they controlled the legislature. They have known this for years. This is why they are losing voters.
“We will expand care for renters and strike a balance with the needs of people looking to change homes,” he said.
The idea of expanded care for renters is a concession that the next generation will not own homes and the government will not make the changes necessary to address that issue. Lai offered no vision of walkable, livable cities. No mention of single family housing. As University of Wyoming academic Chen Yi-ling (陳怡伶) observes of urban planning in Taiwan “residents of Taiwanese communities are completely unable to direct the development of their own living environment.”
No urgently needed changes in the domestic political economy were even nodded at. Lai’s really important continuity with Tsai was not her positioning on Taiwan’s international status, but their shared failure to challenge the developmentalist ideology that is killing Taiwan. Instead, Lai signaled that the system will continue, unchanged, offering rent subsidies and minimum wage rises as sops to the voters, but leaving the bosses and developers in the saddle.
Does the DPP even want votes in the next election?
Lai laid out a program of technology development and growth, but there was not a word about the immigration policies necessary to support it. In fact, Taiwan’s low birth rates, declining population and complete lack of immigration policy were hardly addressed in the speech.
Lai did mention child-care subsidies, but only in the context of existing children, not as a stimulus to have more. Of course, such a speech must be positive, but it must also be serious. Taiwan’s catastrophic demographic trends are vital national security issues, more important than Lai’s presentation of Taiwan’s status.
Lai’s speech was a concrete demonstration of what scholars Catherine Chou and Mark Harrison argue in their new book on Taiwan, Revolutionary Taiwan: Making Nationhood in a Changing World Order, that “the threat from China siphons off Taiwanese resources and energy from quality-of-life issues and long-term socioeconomic planning,” Chou herself said last week.
DEVELOPMENTALIST STATE
The PRC threat has enabled successive presidents to freeze Taiwan’s domestic political economy while buying off voters with subsidies. This is in part because Taiwan’s economic successes, the foundation of Taiwan’s independent existence, legitimate the developmentalist state, especially when Taiwan is compared to the PRC. This gives developmentalist structures and policies added ideological oomph.
Lai’s speech pays tribute to that construction of Taiwan’s history, not merely in its recapitulation of the past, but in its vision of the future. Lai said that the government would “roll out the new Silicon Valley plan for Taoyuan, Hsinchu and Miaoli to form a central technology cluster connecting the north with the south” (this implies that later in his presidency Hsinchu and Miaoli will be combined into a new municipality, as many have predicted), and offering the “Smart Technology Southern Industrial Ecosystem Development Plan.” Lai hit all the keywords: “smart,” “cluster,” “ecosystem” and “Silicon Valley.”
A developmentalist dream for a nation that will be short hundreds of thousands of tech workers by the end of his first term, and has no immigration policy.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
June 23 to June 29 After capturing the walled city of Hsinchu on June 22, 1895, the Japanese hoped to quickly push south and seize control of Taiwan’s entire west coast — but their advance was stalled for more than a month. Not only did local Hakka fighters continue to cause them headaches, resistance forces even attempted to retake the city three times. “We had planned to occupy Anping (Tainan) and Takao (Kaohsiung) as soon as possible, but ever since we took Hsinchu, nearby bandits proclaiming to be ‘righteous people’ (義民) have been destroying train tracks and electrical cables, and gathering in villages
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
Swooping low over the banks of a Nile River tributary, an aid flight run by retired American military officers released a stream of food-stuffed sacks over a town emptied by fighting in South Sudan, a country wracked by conflict. Last week’s air drop was the latest in a controversial development — private contracting firms led by former US intelligence officers and military veterans delivering aid to some of the world’s deadliest conflict zones, in operations organized with governments that are combatants in the conflicts. The moves are roiling the global aid community, which warns of a more militarized, politicized and profit-seeking trend
RSS