My friends and I have been enjoying the last two weeks of revelation after revelation of the financial and legal shenanigans of Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) head and recent presidential candidate Ko Wen-je (柯文哲).
Every day brings fresh news — allegations that a building had purchased with party subsidies but listed in Ko’s name, allegations of downloading party subsidy funds into his personal accounts. Ko’s call last December for the regulations for the government’s special budgets to be amended to enforce fiscal discipline, and his September unveiling of his party’s anti-corruption plan, have now taken on a certain delightful irony.
On X, longtime Taiwan scholar and observer Mark Harrison tweeted: “Ko and the TPP in trouble. If only someone could have predicted this ... oh wait, all of #taiwantwitter did.”
Photo: Bloomburg
That’s pretty much correct.
All of Taiwan Twitter knew what Ko was, and how this would likely end. We’d lived through the low approval ratings of his mayorship in Taipei, and the major scandals during that time. So had the voters.
FOREIGN MEDIA TRACTION
Photo: CNA
The only place where Ko had traction was among young male voters, and of course, the media, especially the international media. The story was obvious: Ko and the young, and the international media ran with it. One is moved to wonder how much Ko benefited from all that free advertising, all that concealment of his true positions, all that disappearance of his past.
“A non-traditional candidate resonates with Taiwan’s youth ahead of Saturday’s presidential election,” scribed AP news. South China Morning Post said: “Ko Wen-je’s unconventional style and focus on domestic issues is winning support among young voters who are turning away from the main parties.” The Straits Times titled a piece: “Ko Wen-je, the improbable politician popular with young Taiwanese voters.”
He was often described as some variation on “a straight-talking politician.” This rhetorical position linking “non-traditional” or “maverick” with youth was common across the international media, whose verbiage is reflected in Taiwan’s own reporting.
Photo: CNA
In vain did local commentators writing in English point out that Ko was no maverick but was in fact an unimaginative cranky uncle-type authoritarian social conservative who had said aloud that people with non-standard sexualities had a mental illness, who had said of social housing that poor people did not deserve a three-bedroom house, whose economic and social ideas were decades out of date, whose inspirations were dictators like Mao Zedong (毛澤東) and former Taiwan president Chiang Ching-kuo (蔣經國) and Singapore (he has likened the TPP to the People’s Action Party).
Little to none of that made its way into the foreign media. One has to wonder how someone who thought Singapore a model would have treated the international media, had he gained real power.
CONTEXTUALIZING KO
Photo courtesy of Taiwan People’s Party
The Guardian at least had a grazing shot at the issue in its election-eve report: “Depending on who is asked, Ko is a flexible pragmatist or a superficial populist who lacks core values.”
Some pieces similarly noted that he was not popular with older voters. Indeed, the thing about Ko highlighted in international media reports was always his alleged popularity with the young, never his unpopularity with older, wiser voters.
The reach for false balance (“depends on who you ask”) is a safe move, but ultimately, Taiwan would have been better served if any of the reports had evinced the depth and knowledge of longtime Taiwan watcher James Baron’s excellent piece at Unherd: “Is Ko Wen-je China’s man in Taiwan? The presidential candidate is the ultimate shapeshifter.” The title forthrightly locates Ko’s true politics and position in the political landscape, which Baron then backs up by quoting well-known Taiwan politics observers Lev Nachman and Nathan Batto.
The possibility that Ko was China’s preferred candidate came out quite early — he had to respond to that allegation in May of last year, for example. It was more or less AWOL from international press reports, except for a January Nikkei piece.
Another problematic stance Baron avoids is treating Ko as if he were sui generis. Instead, Baron backgrounds him against Taiwan history. That was one possibility — there were many ways Ko could have been contextualized. Ko could also have been backgrounded against his own historical dreams, preconceptions, ideals and political mimicry, as an excellent February piece in the Melbourne Asia Review did.
I did so in last month, discussing him in light of his emulation of Chiang Ching-kuo. Ironically, the only international media piece I could find that linked a presidential candidate to Chiang was a Reuters piece about the DPP’s William Lai.
CREATED BY THE MEDIA
Ko was sometimes compared to Trump, who similarly cried that his nation would be lost if he were not elected, but the international media failed to place Ko in a much broader comparison with other populist and would-be populist leaders around the globe.
That would have been helpful in understanding what he was, an understanding that could have been reflected back to Taiwan. It would also have helped contextualize why older voters were turned off by Ko: we’ve all seen multiple examples of politicians like Ko in our lifetimes. The comparison to Trump is apt: Trump, like Ko, was and is in part a creation of the media. If only it had learned from the Trump experience.
Consider just one item widely cited by local observers and media, Ko’s constant reference to his own superior intelligence and his abuse of people without college educations. This is often instanced by his local critics. For example, the extraordinary writers Albert Wu (吳孟軒) and Michelle Kuo (郭怡慧) of A Broad and Ample Road, explaining why progressives hate Ko, point to his “unabashed, unapologetic, self-aggrandizing elitism. Ko often refers to his IQ score of 157, name-drops NTU ...”
This is a quintessential behavior of Ko’s. Good luck finding it widely reported in the international media.
Fast forward to last month, with its deluge of scandals involving Ko and his party for nearly three weeks now. The reader can be forgiven for expecting a reciprocal deluge of international media reports on the “maverick” and “outsider” and his scandals, especially since Taiwan is now well-stocked with talented international reporters, but as I write this, the only piece in a major international media I can find is from the always solid Nikkei, dated Aug. 16.
I guess when the only thing truly “maverick” about Ko is his unexcelled naivete about stocking his party with ex-Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) people, the international media loses interest.
As of this writing, Ko has announced that he will be stepping down as party chair for three months.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
Sept.16 to Sept. 22 The “anti-communist train” with then-president Chiang Kai-shek’s (蔣介石) face plastered on the engine puffed along the “sugar railway” (糖業鐵路) in May 1955, drawing enthusiastic crowds at 103 stops covering nearly 1,200km. An estimated 1.58 million spectators were treated to propaganda films, plays and received free sugar products. By this time, the state-run Taiwan Sugar Corporation (台糖, Taisugar) had managed to connect the previously separate east-west lines established by Japanese-era sugar factories, allowing the anti-communist train to travel easily from Taichung to Pingtung’s Donggang Township (東港). Last Sunday’s feature (Taiwan in Time: The sugar express) covered the inauguration of the
The corruption cases surrounding former Taipei Mayor and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) head Ko Wen-je (柯文哲) are just one item in the endless cycle of noise and fuss obscuring Taiwan’s deep and urgent structural and social problems. Even the case itself, as James Baron observed in an excellent piece at the Diplomat last week, is only one manifestation of the greater problem of deep-rooted corruption in land development. Last week the government announced a program to permit 25,000 foreign university students, primarily from the Philippines, Indonesia and Malaysia, to work in Taiwan after graduation for 2-4 years. That number is a
In a stark demonstration of how award-winning breakthroughs can come from the most unlikely directions, researchers have won an Ig Nobel prize for discovering that mammals can breathe through their anuses. After a series of tests on mice, rats and pigs, Japanese scientists found the animals absorb oxygen delivered through the rectum, work that underpins a clinical trial to see whether the procedure can treat respiratory failure. The team is among 10 recognized in this year’s Ig Nobel awards (see below for more), the irreverent accolades given for achievements that “first make people laugh, and then make them think.” They are not
This Qing Dynasty trail takes hikers from renowned hot springs in the East Rift Valley, up to the top of the Coastal Mountain Range, and down to the Pacific Short vacations to eastern Taiwan often require choosing between the Rift Valley with its pineapple fields, rice paddies and broader range of amenities, or the less populated coastal route for its ocean scenery. For those who can’t decide, why not try both? The Antong Traversing Trail (安通越嶺道) provides just such an opportunity. Built 149 years ago, the trail linked up these two formerly isolated parts of the island by crossing over the Coastal Mountain Range. After decades of serving as a convenient path for local Amis, Han settlers, missionaries and smugglers, the trail fell into disuse once modern roadways were built
RSS