An international scheme to tax the wealth of the world’s 3,000 billionaires is technically feasible and could net up to US$250 billion a year in extra revenue, a new report says.
A study by the French economist Gabriel Zucman concluded that progress in finding ways to tax multinational corporations meant it was now possible to levy a global tax on individuals — even if not every country agreed to take part.
Zucman prepared the report after being invited by Brazil — which now holds the presidency of the G20 group of developed and developing nations — to examine ways of increasing the low levels of tax currently paid by the super-rich.
Photo: AFP
“There is overwhelming public support for this idea,” Zucman said at the report’s launch. “Ten years ago nobody believed 130 countries would support a minimum tax on multinationals. It was thought of as utopian.”
The report said billionaires were currently paying an average of 0.3 percent tax on their wealth — less than the rates paid by workers. Zucman said the average wealth of the top 0.0001 percent of individuals had grown by 7.1 percent a year on average between 1987 and this year, increasing the share of global wealth of billionaires from 3 percent to 14 percent.
Describing his plan as a top-up to income tax so that billionaires paid an annual tax bill worth at least 2 percent of their wealth, Zucman said progressive taxation was a “key pillar of modern societies.”
International cooperation was needed to prevent a “race to the bottom,” he said, but it was not necessary for every country to sign up for the idea to get off the ground. The US opposes a global tax on wealth, although Zucman said US President Joe Biden’s budget proposal to tax America’s super-rich was consistent with his plan.
Zucman said valuing the wealth of billionaires would be relatively simple because most of it was held in the form of shares. His report said it could be enforced successfully even if all countries did not adopt it, by strengthening current exit taxes (levies on rich people taking their money to a non-participating jurisdiction) and implementing “tax collector of last resort.”
This would involve extending to individuals rules that allow participating countries to tax non-participating countries’ undertaxed multinationals.
The proposal will be discussed at next month’s G20 meeting of finance ministers in Rio de Janeiro.
Oxfam International’s interim executive director Amitabh Behar said: “This is a sensible and serious proposal that is in every government’s strategic economic interest. All G20 countries should support Brazil’s push to secure the first-ever global deal to tax the super-rich.”
Phil White, member of Patriotic Millionaires UK, said: “Zucman’s report shows that a coordinated, international approach to taxing the super-rich is the sensible and fair way to address the extreme concentration of wealth.
“Addressing billionaire wealth should be viewed as the initial step; if we aim to safeguard democracy from the corrosive effects of extreme wealth, then multimillionaires like me should also be prepared to pay more – and take pride in contributing their fair share.”
Extending the plan to those with wealth in excess of US$100 million would raise an additional US$100 billion TO US$140 billion a year, Zucman said.
April 28 to May 4 During the Japanese colonial era, a city’s “first” high school typically served Japanese students, while Taiwanese attended the “second” high school. Only in Taichung was this reversed. That’s because when Taichung First High School opened its doors on May 1, 1915 to serve Taiwanese students who were previously barred from secondary education, it was the only high school in town. Former principal Hideo Azukisawa threatened to quit when the government in 1922 attempted to transfer the “first” designation to a new local high school for Japanese students, leading to this unusual situation. Prior to the Taichung First
When the South Vietnamese capital of Saigon fell to the North Vietnamese forces 50 years ago this week, it prompted a mass exodus of some 2 million people — hundreds of thousands fleeing perilously on small boats across open water to escape the communist regime. Many ultimately settled in Southern California’s Orange County in an area now known as “Little Saigon,” not far from Marine Corps Base Camp Pendleton, where the first refugees were airlifted upon reaching the US. The diaspora now also has significant populations in Virginia, Texas and Washington state, as well as in countries including France and Australia.
On April 17, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) launched a bold campaign to revive and revitalize the KMT base by calling for an impromptu rally at the Taipei prosecutor’s offices to protest recent arrests of KMT recall campaigners over allegations of forgery and fraud involving signatures of dead voters. The protest had no time to apply for permits and was illegal, but that played into the sense of opposition grievance at alleged weaponization of the judiciary by the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) to “annihilate” the opposition parties. Blamed for faltering recall campaigns and faced with a KMT chair
Article 2 of the Additional Articles of the Constitution of the Republic of China (中華民國憲法增修條文) stipulates that upon a vote of no confidence in the premier, the president can dissolve the legislature within 10 days. If the legislature is dissolved, a new legislative election must be held within 60 days, and the legislators’ terms will then be reckoned from that election. Two weeks ago Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (蔣萬安) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) proposed that the legislature hold a vote of no confidence in the premier and dare the president to dissolve the legislature. The legislature is currently controlled
RSS