An international scheme to tax the wealth of the world’s 3,000 billionaires is technically feasible and could net up to US$250 billion a year in extra revenue, a new report says.
A study by the French economist Gabriel Zucman concluded that progress in finding ways to tax multinational corporations meant it was now possible to levy a global tax on individuals — even if not every country agreed to take part.
Zucman prepared the report after being invited by Brazil — which now holds the presidency of the G20 group of developed and developing nations — to examine ways of increasing the low levels of tax currently paid by the super-rich.
Photo: AFP
“There is overwhelming public support for this idea,” Zucman said at the report’s launch. “Ten years ago nobody believed 130 countries would support a minimum tax on multinationals. It was thought of as utopian.”
The report said billionaires were currently paying an average of 0.3 percent tax on their wealth — less than the rates paid by workers. Zucman said the average wealth of the top 0.0001 percent of individuals had grown by 7.1 percent a year on average between 1987 and this year, increasing the share of global wealth of billionaires from 3 percent to 14 percent.
Describing his plan as a top-up to income tax so that billionaires paid an annual tax bill worth at least 2 percent of their wealth, Zucman said progressive taxation was a “key pillar of modern societies.”
International cooperation was needed to prevent a “race to the bottom,” he said, but it was not necessary for every country to sign up for the idea to get off the ground. The US opposes a global tax on wealth, although Zucman said US President Joe Biden’s budget proposal to tax America’s super-rich was consistent with his plan.
Zucman said valuing the wealth of billionaires would be relatively simple because most of it was held in the form of shares. His report said it could be enforced successfully even if all countries did not adopt it, by strengthening current exit taxes (levies on rich people taking their money to a non-participating jurisdiction) and implementing “tax collector of last resort.”
This would involve extending to individuals rules that allow participating countries to tax non-participating countries’ undertaxed multinationals.
The proposal will be discussed at next month’s G20 meeting of finance ministers in Rio de Janeiro.
Oxfam International’s interim executive director Amitabh Behar said: “This is a sensible and serious proposal that is in every government’s strategic economic interest. All G20 countries should support Brazil’s push to secure the first-ever global deal to tax the super-rich.”
Phil White, member of Patriotic Millionaires UK, said: “Zucman’s report shows that a coordinated, international approach to taxing the super-rich is the sensible and fair way to address the extreme concentration of wealth.
“Addressing billionaire wealth should be viewed as the initial step; if we aim to safeguard democracy from the corrosive effects of extreme wealth, then multimillionaires like me should also be prepared to pay more – and take pride in contributing their fair share.”
Extending the plan to those with wealth in excess of US$100 million would raise an additional US$100 billion TO US$140 billion a year, Zucman said.
June 23 to June 29 After capturing the walled city of Hsinchu on June 22, 1895, the Japanese hoped to quickly push south and seize control of Taiwan’s entire west coast — but their advance was stalled for more than a month. Not only did local Hakka fighters continue to cause them headaches, resistance forces even attempted to retake the city three times. “We had planned to occupy Anping (Tainan) and Takao (Kaohsiung) as soon as possible, but ever since we took Hsinchu, nearby bandits proclaiming to be ‘righteous people’ (義民) have been destroying train tracks and electrical cables, and gathering in villages
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
Swooping low over the banks of a Nile River tributary, an aid flight run by retired American military officers released a stream of food-stuffed sacks over a town emptied by fighting in South Sudan, a country wracked by conflict. Last week’s air drop was the latest in a controversial development — private contracting firms led by former US intelligence officers and military veterans delivering aid to some of the world’s deadliest conflict zones, in operations organized with governments that are combatants in the conflicts. The moves are roiling the global aid community, which warns of a more militarized, politicized and profit-seeking trend
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
RSS