Located down a sideroad in old Wanhua District (萬華區), Waley Art (水谷藝術) has an established reputation for curating some of the more provocative indie art exhibitions in Taipei. And this month is no exception.
Beyond the innocuous facade of a shophouse, the full three stories of the gallery space (including the basement) have been taken over by photographs, installation videos and abstract images courtesy of two creatives who hail from the opposite ends of the earth, Taiwan’s Hsu Yi-ting (許懿婷) and Germany’s Benjamin Janzen.
“In 2019, I had an art residency in Europe,” Hsu says. “I met Benjamin in the lobby of a graduation show. I was attracted by his work and his kombucha drink. That’s how we met.”
Photo courtesy of Hsu Yi-ting
Hsu, who goes by the English name Eating (a homophone of her Chinese name), grew-up in Taipei. Despite, or perhaps because she hails from Taiwan’s northern conurbation, her intellectual concerns explore the interplay of urban and rural space, the latter of which, she says, is often compromised by politicians catering to the material demands of urbanites.
“Society is always controlled by upper classes,” she tells the Taipei Times. “But farmers are real, they are the people at the base level. You know, it’s the most human thing [to grow food]. Food is the most direct thing you can get from a place where you exist. But there’s no protection for them.”
Beside the River (河邊), then, is an exhibition that explores how social and biological habitats are shaped by economic relationships, and Hsu has made the muddy banks of the Tamsui River (淡水河) her focus.
Photo courtesy of Hsu Yi-ting
SUBTERREANAN INSTALLATION
Down a narrow flight of stairs that leads into Waley’s basement, Hsu has placed plants and organic matter to invoke a riverside setting. Amidst the foliage, a short film loops on a screen. Although the imagery is conceptual, the work, titled, Mud and Embankments — The Vegetable Murder Case asks a powerful question: “How does contemporary capitalism affect human-nature relations at water-land junctures?”
For anyone who lives in Taipei, a sprawling city bisected by two major rivers where farms and high-rise apartment blocks still persist cheek-by-jowl, this question is a potent one.
Photo: Thomas Bird, Taipei Times
To the accompaniment of a suspenseful soundscape that mixes the sounds of houses being demolished, the narrative uses vegetables cultivated in the farmland as metaphors for the plight of riverside farmers. According to Hsu, the video “personifies a murder incident of the pastoral scenery.”
The homicide analogy used in her “small theater” essentially reveals how “the government kills the farmer and farming culture in Taipei.”
Her approach to art might be contemporary but history is not absent from the frame. As she sees it, the friction of urban and rural tectonic plates is nothing new in Formosa.
Photo courtesy of Hsu Yi-ting
“In my work, I revisit historical anxieties from Taiwan’s Japanese colonial hunger issues to the early Republic of China’s residential concerns to today’s security fears,” she says, talking about “boundaries” — places like the Tamsui River — “where landscape and power dynamics intersect” in both “visible and invisible” ways.
BOTENAICAL DENTISTRY
Benjamin Janzen’s contribution to the exhibition also explores ecological issues from both international and domestic perspectives. As with Hsu’s work, the legacy of colonialism is significant because, as he puts it, Taiwan’s waves of invasion and settlement have transformed the flora and fauna just as much as it has shaped the populace and its identity.
Photo courtesy Benjamin Janzen
“The works created for this exhibition are influenced by a book What World Is This? (2022) by Judith Butler,” the Hamburg-based artist explains. “In the book, Butler talks about the COVID-19 virus as something that connects the individual human body and the communal body –– our inner-selves with the body of society.”
Janzen, who has never visited Taiwan before, began his research by visiting various parks including the Youth Park (青年公園) and Taipei Botanical Gardens (台北植物園).
“What I discovered is much of what we see [in Taiwan] was brought here by foreigners. Like the mango tree which was imported by the Dutch from India. The Chinese fig tree, which is everywhere, is not native. Even the palm trees were brought here by the Japanese.”
The trees are not the only invasive species in the parks that Janzen observed.
“Many of the trees have been damaged by parasites, which also came from elsewhere.”
Using alginate, the substance a dentist would use to make a mold of a patient’s teeth, Janzen has made molds of the scars left in tree trunks by parasitic plants and fungi. These molds he has then put on display on the walls of Waley Art.
“I’m asking, who is the parasite and who is the host?” he says.
Janzen, who has a background in theater, also documented himself getting the mold from the trees, which is also on show in the gallery.
“The notion of performativity, the process, is very important to me,” he says.
The artworks he’s created are not just open to view but to touch as well. The artist hopes the feel of the work will help a visitor meditate on the legacy of travel and migration, invasion and belonging — themes that are particularly prevalent in Taiwan’s contemporary discourse, as they are internationally, due to such issues as climate migration, wars in Ukraine and the Middle East, as well as the pandemic’s lingering impact.
“A lot of my work also decays and is not stable, especially it is not sellable,” Janzen says, alluding to another theme permeating the Beside the River exhibition, that of impermanence.
“I’m interested in the microcosm. I like to zoom in and zoom out. You need to look at things from a distance, but you can also need to get close to things, to look at all the details,” he says.
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
April 21 to April 27 Hsieh Er’s (謝娥) political fortunes were rising fast after she got out of jail and joined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in December 1945. Not only did she hold key positions in various committees, she was elected the only woman on the Taipei City Council and headed to Nanjing in 1946 as the sole Taiwanese female representative to the National Constituent Assembly. With the support of first lady Soong May-ling (宋美齡), she started the Taipei Women’s Association and Taiwan Provincial Women’s Association, where she
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,
RSS