A time-travelling TV comedy with a bawdy middle-aged hero has become a big hit in Japan, juxtaposing the country’s brash 1980s boom years with its more politically correct present day.
In the series, titled Extremely Inappropriate, the past isn’t rose-tinted: there’s smoking on the bus, boobs on television and corporal punishment galore.
But modern Japan doesn’t get a free pass either.
Photo: EPA
When schoolteacher and father Ichiro Ogawa is catapulted from 1986 to this year, he scandalizes millennials and Gen Z-ers with his disregard for their views on gender, family and labor rights.
Implicit in his candid words is a question: is society today, with its good intentions around issues like diversity and work-life balance, really all it’s cracked up to be?
The show’s satire of how Japan has changed over the decades has struck a chord with viewers young and old.
Last month, it became the first program made by major broadcaster TBS to top Netflix’s most-watched list in Japan for three weeks running.
Producer Aki Isoyama, who is 56, initially thought it would be “very challenging” to poke fun at today’s progressive values without triggering a backlash from the public.
The show isn’t meant as a verdict on the superiority of one era over the other, she said.
But one inspiration for her and screenwriter Kankuro Kudo, 53, was the idea that “life has become more difficult in some aspects today.”
“Our society has certainly gotten better, but in a way more restrictive, too, with everything dictated by compliance and protocols,” Isoyama said.
Today, when something is pronounced unacceptable, “we often unquestioningly accept that explanation and refrain from saying or doing it,” she added.
“The show will hopefully make viewers stop and ask themselves: ‘Why was it banned in the first place?’”
HARASSMENT AND SEXISM
One 25-year-old fan, Mao Yamada, said the show is a reminder that “our society has become more accepting of diversity, including LGBTQ rights.”
“It’s good we’re now more mindful of things like sexual harassment,” she said, adding that she understands why some might feel “too many things are perhaps restricted and kept unsaid.”
Workplace pep talks to Gen-Z hires are denounced as harassment in Extremely Inappropriate, and an exasperated TV producer tries to censor everything said on air.
Meanwhile, freewheeling Ogawa — who in his own bygone world yells “grow a pair!” at male students and teases women about menopause — is lambasted by today’s generation, including a feminist sociologist.
He is enlightened on the concepts of gender neutrality and sexual consent. Marriage, he learns, is no longer the definition of happiness.
Viewer Kyo Maeda, 68, called the show’s 1980s scenes an accurate portrayal of “what our everyday life used to be like.”
“Our life was full of what could easily be seen as harassment and sexism by today’s morals,” he said.
In 1986, Japan was basking in the glow of its post-war evolution into an economic superpower, with many workers fixated on success, no matter the hours required.
On Extremely Inappropriate young recruits — a generation shaped by Japan’s “lost decades” of stagnation from the early 1990s — matter-of-factly clock off on time.
In the 80s, “I loved going to work, you know,” Maeda reminisced, chuckling. “The economy was still picking up and we were all-out at work.”
“I feel like there was more hope and excitement about the future in the 80s than there is now,” he said.
BOLDER THEMES
Extremely Inappropriate, whose final episode aired yesterday, has received its share of criticism in the real world.
Some say concepts like feminism or discrimination based on appearance are oversimplified, and that political correctness is treated as little more than a shackle on free speech.
Interspersed throughout the show are musical performances and jokey disclaimers excusing Ogawa’s gaffes and insults.
But beneath the levity is a serious message, said Takahiko Kageyama, a media studies professor at Doshisha Women’s College of Liberal Arts.
“The creators obviously wanted us to reflect on the status quo of our society,” he said.
“But if this intent had come off too straightforward or preachy, it would’ve just fallen flat.”
The show’s themes are “bold” given the sensitive landscape of Japan’s entertainment industry today, he said.
Boy-band empire Johnny’s and Associates faced an existential crisis last year over a sexual abuse scandal involving its late founder.
Allegations of workplace bullying have also disgraced the prestigious theatre troupe Takarazuka Revue.
Producer Isoyama said that making the show in parallel with these events had sometimes felt uncanny.
“With Johnny’s and Takarazuka, it was like facts far stranger than fiction were unfolding around us,” she said.
But “this made us feel that the timing of the release would be fitting, considering how the industry is changing, the way it should.”
Taiwan’s English education system is being pulled apart by three opposing forces. Bilingual Nation 2030 pulls students toward English and global communication. Artificial Intelligence (AI) readiness pulls them toward digital judgment, verification and AI-mediated work. But Taiwan’s old exam culture pulls them back toward memorization, grammar drills, timed reading and correct answers. If the education system keeps using old exams to define success, it risks producing graduates who are neither genuinely bilingual nor genuinely AI-ready, but trained for tasks machines can already perform. The first force is Bilingual Nation 2030. Launched in 2018, the policy aimed to “help Taiwan’s workforce connect
It seems every few days one bumps into one of those “real man” comments in which Taiwan is urged to “face reality” or similar, and “make a deal,” with the speaker implying that soon it will be too late. “Deal” advocates always present themselves as having a superior grip on reality, and the manly ability to make the “hard choice.” Their testosterone-laden language often echoes that of Taiwan sellout advocates. Note that such commentary always specifies a process (“make a deal, work with, make progress”), never the end state of what occupation by a violent authoritarian colonialist state will entail. In
There are shadowy cabals plotting to sell out Taiwan to be annexed by China, by invasion if necessary. Fortunately, they are buffoons. In 2019, former Bamboo Union gangster and founder of the China Unification Promotion Party (CUPP), Chang An-le (張安樂, colorfully known as “White Wolf”), led a protest at the Legislative Yuan against comments made by then-premier Su Tseng-chang (蘇貞昌) that in the event of an attack by China, he would never surrender, but would protect the nation by fighting to the end, even if he only had a broom. Chang had party members bring a wooden casket that they
June 1 to June 7 "If all Taiwanese were as afraid of dying as you, then what would happen?” Physician Shih Chiang-nan (施江南) reportedly said this to his wife Chen Chiao-tung (陳焦桐) after she urged him to stop intervening on behalf of Taiwanese soldiers stranded overseas after serving in the Japanese Army during World War II. Shih had clashed with high-ranking officials over the issue, engaged in several heated arguments with Taiwan governor-general Chen Yi (陳儀) and allegedly shouted at general Ko Yuan-fen (柯遠芬), chief of staff of the Taiwan Garrison Command, over
RSS