A time-travelling TV comedy with a bawdy middle-aged hero has become a big hit in Japan, juxtaposing the country’s brash 1980s boom years with its more politically correct present day.
In the series, titled Extremely Inappropriate, the past isn’t rose-tinted: there’s smoking on the bus, boobs on television and corporal punishment galore.
But modern Japan doesn’t get a free pass either.
Photo: EPA
When schoolteacher and father Ichiro Ogawa is catapulted from 1986 to this year, he scandalizes millennials and Gen Z-ers with his disregard for their views on gender, family and labor rights.
Implicit in his candid words is a question: is society today, with its good intentions around issues like diversity and work-life balance, really all it’s cracked up to be?
The show’s satire of how Japan has changed over the decades has struck a chord with viewers young and old.
Last month, it became the first program made by major broadcaster TBS to top Netflix’s most-watched list in Japan for three weeks running.
Producer Aki Isoyama, who is 56, initially thought it would be “very challenging” to poke fun at today’s progressive values without triggering a backlash from the public.
The show isn’t meant as a verdict on the superiority of one era over the other, she said.
But one inspiration for her and screenwriter Kankuro Kudo, 53, was the idea that “life has become more difficult in some aspects today.”
“Our society has certainly gotten better, but in a way more restrictive, too, with everything dictated by compliance and protocols,” Isoyama said.
Today, when something is pronounced unacceptable, “we often unquestioningly accept that explanation and refrain from saying or doing it,” she added.
“The show will hopefully make viewers stop and ask themselves: ‘Why was it banned in the first place?’”
HARASSMENT AND SEXISM
One 25-year-old fan, Mao Yamada, said the show is a reminder that “our society has become more accepting of diversity, including LGBTQ rights.”
“It’s good we’re now more mindful of things like sexual harassment,” she said, adding that she understands why some might feel “too many things are perhaps restricted and kept unsaid.”
Workplace pep talks to Gen-Z hires are denounced as harassment in Extremely Inappropriate, and an exasperated TV producer tries to censor everything said on air.
Meanwhile, freewheeling Ogawa — who in his own bygone world yells “grow a pair!” at male students and teases women about menopause — is lambasted by today’s generation, including a feminist sociologist.
He is enlightened on the concepts of gender neutrality and sexual consent. Marriage, he learns, is no longer the definition of happiness.
Viewer Kyo Maeda, 68, called the show’s 1980s scenes an accurate portrayal of “what our everyday life used to be like.”
“Our life was full of what could easily be seen as harassment and sexism by today’s morals,” he said.
In 1986, Japan was basking in the glow of its post-war evolution into an economic superpower, with many workers fixated on success, no matter the hours required.
On Extremely Inappropriate young recruits — a generation shaped by Japan’s “lost decades” of stagnation from the early 1990s — matter-of-factly clock off on time.
In the 80s, “I loved going to work, you know,” Maeda reminisced, chuckling. “The economy was still picking up and we were all-out at work.”
“I feel like there was more hope and excitement about the future in the 80s than there is now,” he said.
BOLDER THEMES
Extremely Inappropriate, whose final episode aired yesterday, has received its share of criticism in the real world.
Some say concepts like feminism or discrimination based on appearance are oversimplified, and that political correctness is treated as little more than a shackle on free speech.
Interspersed throughout the show are musical performances and jokey disclaimers excusing Ogawa’s gaffes and insults.
But beneath the levity is a serious message, said Takahiko Kageyama, a media studies professor at Doshisha Women’s College of Liberal Arts.
“The creators obviously wanted us to reflect on the status quo of our society,” he said.
“But if this intent had come off too straightforward or preachy, it would’ve just fallen flat.”
The show’s themes are “bold” given the sensitive landscape of Japan’s entertainment industry today, he said.
Boy-band empire Johnny’s and Associates faced an existential crisis last year over a sexual abuse scandal involving its late founder.
Allegations of workplace bullying have also disgraced the prestigious theatre troupe Takarazuka Revue.
Producer Isoyama said that making the show in parallel with these events had sometimes felt uncanny.
“With Johnny’s and Takarazuka, it was like facts far stranger than fiction were unfolding around us,” she said.
But “this made us feel that the timing of the release would be fitting, considering how the industry is changing, the way it should.”
Oct. 27 to Nov. 2 Over a breakfast of soymilk and fried dough costing less than NT$400, seven officials and engineers agreed on a NT$400 million plan — unaware that it would mark the beginning of Taiwan’s semiconductor empire. It was a cold February morning in 1974. Gathered at the unassuming shop were Economics minister Sun Yun-hsuan (孫運璿), director-general of Transportation and Communications Kao Yu-shu (高玉樹), Industrial Technology Research Institute (ITRI) president Wang Chao-chen (王兆振), Telecommunications Laboratories director Kang Pao-huang (康寶煌), Executive Yuan secretary-general Fei Hua (費驊), director-general of Telecommunications Fang Hsien-chi (方賢齊) and Radio Corporation of America (RCA) Laboratories director Pan
The consensus on the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) chair race is that Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) ran a populist, ideological back-to-basics campaign and soundly defeated former Taipei mayor Hau Lung-bin (郝龍斌), the candidate backed by the big institutional players. Cheng tapped into a wave of popular enthusiasm within the KMT, while the institutional players’ get-out-the-vote abilities fell flat, suggesting their power has weakened significantly. Yet, a closer look at the race paints a more complicated picture, raising questions about some analysts’ conclusions, including my own. TURNOUT Here is a surprising statistic: Turnout was 130,678, or 39.46 percent of the 331,145 eligible party
The classic warmth of a good old-fashioned izakaya beckons you in, all cozy nooks and dark wood finishes, as tables order a third round and waiters sling tapas-sized bites and assorted — sometimes unidentifiable — skewered meats. But there’s a romantic hush about this Ximending (西門町) hotspot, with cocktails savored, plating elegant and never rushed and daters and diners lit by candlelight and chandelier. Each chair is mismatched and the assorted tables appear to be the fanciest picks from a nearby flea market. A naked sewing mannequin stands in a dimly lit corner, adorned with antique mirrors and draped foliage
The election of Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) as chair of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) marked a triumphant return of pride in the “Chinese” in the party name. Cheng wants Taiwanese to be proud to call themselves Chinese again. The unambiguous winner was a return to the KMT ideology that formed in the early 2000s under then chairman Lien Chan (連戰) and president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) put into practice as far as he could, until ultimately thwarted by hundreds of thousands of protestors thronging the streets in what became known as the Sunflower movement in 2014. Cheng is an unambiguous Chinese ethnonationalist,
RSS