A time-travelling TV comedy with a bawdy middle-aged hero has become a big hit in Japan, juxtaposing the country’s brash 1980s boom years with its more politically correct present day.
In the series, titled Extremely Inappropriate, the past isn’t rose-tinted: there’s smoking on the bus, boobs on television and corporal punishment galore.
But modern Japan doesn’t get a free pass either.
Photo: EPA
When schoolteacher and father Ichiro Ogawa is catapulted from 1986 to this year, he scandalizes millennials and Gen Z-ers with his disregard for their views on gender, family and labor rights.
Implicit in his candid words is a question: is society today, with its good intentions around issues like diversity and work-life balance, really all it’s cracked up to be?
The show’s satire of how Japan has changed over the decades has struck a chord with viewers young and old.
Last month, it became the first program made by major broadcaster TBS to top Netflix’s most-watched list in Japan for three weeks running.
Producer Aki Isoyama, who is 56, initially thought it would be “very challenging” to poke fun at today’s progressive values without triggering a backlash from the public.
The show isn’t meant as a verdict on the superiority of one era over the other, she said.
But one inspiration for her and screenwriter Kankuro Kudo, 53, was the idea that “life has become more difficult in some aspects today.”
“Our society has certainly gotten better, but in a way more restrictive, too, with everything dictated by compliance and protocols,” Isoyama said.
Today, when something is pronounced unacceptable, “we often unquestioningly accept that explanation and refrain from saying or doing it,” she added.
“The show will hopefully make viewers stop and ask themselves: ‘Why was it banned in the first place?’”
HARASSMENT AND SEXISM
One 25-year-old fan, Mao Yamada, said the show is a reminder that “our society has become more accepting of diversity, including LGBTQ rights.”
“It’s good we’re now more mindful of things like sexual harassment,” she said, adding that she understands why some might feel “too many things are perhaps restricted and kept unsaid.”
Workplace pep talks to Gen-Z hires are denounced as harassment in Extremely Inappropriate, and an exasperated TV producer tries to censor everything said on air.
Meanwhile, freewheeling Ogawa — who in his own bygone world yells “grow a pair!” at male students and teases women about menopause — is lambasted by today’s generation, including a feminist sociologist.
He is enlightened on the concepts of gender neutrality and sexual consent. Marriage, he learns, is no longer the definition of happiness.
Viewer Kyo Maeda, 68, called the show’s 1980s scenes an accurate portrayal of “what our everyday life used to be like.”
“Our life was full of what could easily be seen as harassment and sexism by today’s morals,” he said.
In 1986, Japan was basking in the glow of its post-war evolution into an economic superpower, with many workers fixated on success, no matter the hours required.
On Extremely Inappropriate young recruits — a generation shaped by Japan’s “lost decades” of stagnation from the early 1990s — matter-of-factly clock off on time.
In the 80s, “I loved going to work, you know,” Maeda reminisced, chuckling. “The economy was still picking up and we were all-out at work.”
“I feel like there was more hope and excitement about the future in the 80s than there is now,” he said.
BOLDER THEMES
Extremely Inappropriate, whose final episode aired yesterday, has received its share of criticism in the real world.
Some say concepts like feminism or discrimination based on appearance are oversimplified, and that political correctness is treated as little more than a shackle on free speech.
Interspersed throughout the show are musical performances and jokey disclaimers excusing Ogawa’s gaffes and insults.
But beneath the levity is a serious message, said Takahiko Kageyama, a media studies professor at Doshisha Women’s College of Liberal Arts.
“The creators obviously wanted us to reflect on the status quo of our society,” he said.
“But if this intent had come off too straightforward or preachy, it would’ve just fallen flat.”
The show’s themes are “bold” given the sensitive landscape of Japan’s entertainment industry today, he said.
Boy-band empire Johnny’s and Associates faced an existential crisis last year over a sexual abuse scandal involving its late founder.
Allegations of workplace bullying have also disgraced the prestigious theatre troupe Takarazuka Revue.
Producer Isoyama said that making the show in parallel with these events had sometimes felt uncanny.
“With Johnny’s and Takarazuka, it was like facts far stranger than fiction were unfolding around us,” she said.
But “this made us feel that the timing of the release would be fitting, considering how the industry is changing, the way it should.”
In Taiwan there are two economies: the shiny high tech export economy epitomized by Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC, 台積電) and its outsized effect on global supply chains, and the domestic economy, driven by construction and powered by flows of gravel, sand and government contracts. The latter supports the former: we can have an economy without TSMC, but we can’t have one without construction. The labor shortage has heavily impacted public construction in Taiwan. For example, the first phase of the MRT Wanda Line in Taipei, originally slated for next year, has been pushed back to 2027. The government
July 22 to July 28 The Love River’s (愛河) four-decade run as the host of Kaohsiung’s annual dragon boat races came to an abrupt end in 1971 — the once pristine waterway had become too polluted. The 1970 event was infamous for the putrid stench permeating the air, exacerbated by contestants splashing water and sludge onto the shore and even the onlookers. The relocation of the festivities officially marked the “death” of the river, whose condition had rapidly deteriorated during the previous decade. The myriad factories upstream were only partly to blame; as Kaohsiung’s population boomed in the 1960s, all household
Allegations of corruption against three heavyweight politicians from the three major parties are big in the news now. On Wednesday, prosecutors indicted Hsinchu County Commissioner Yang Wen-ke (楊文科) of the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), a judgment is expected this week in the case involving Hsinchu Mayor Ann Kao (高虹安) of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) and former deputy premier and Taoyuan Mayor Cheng Wen-tsan (鄭文燦) of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is being held incommunicado in prison. Unlike the other two cases, Cheng’s case has generated considerable speculation, rumors, suspicions and conspiracy theories from both the pan-blue and pan-green camps.
Stepping inside Waley Art (水谷藝術) in Taipei’s historic Wanhua District (萬華區) one leaves the motorcycle growl and air-conditioner purr of the street and enters a very different sonic realm. Speakers hiss, machines whir and objects chime from all five floors of the shophouse-turned- contemporary art gallery (including the basement). “It’s a bit of a metaphor, the stacking of gallery floors is like the layering of sounds,” observes Australian conceptual artist Samuel Beilby, whose audio installation HZ & Machinic Paragenesis occupies the ground floor of the gallery space. He’s not wrong. Put ‘em in a Box (我們把它都裝在一個盒子裡), which runs until Aug. 18, invites