In European and Asian wild boar populations, the number of chromosomes is generally 36, with some having more thanks to interbreeding with domestic pigs, which usually have 38 chromosomes.
Genetic studies show that the “boars” of Taiwan all have 38 chromosomes, indicating that they are not true wild boars but domesticated pigs gone wild. Hence, as agricultural researchers have noted, they do not fall under the Wildlife Conservation Act.
They don’t contain ractopamine either.
Photo: Liu Hsin-te, Taipei Times
What ever happened to the dreaded ractopork issue? Less than a year ago it was the subject of one of four referendums aimed at the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), which positioned them as a vote of confidence in the administration. They failed, a clear win for the DPP.
The US had expressed worry that a rejection of ractopamine might complicate negotiations with Taiwan. Voters showed clear pragmatism. Indeed, that vote, in conjunction with public’s sensible 2018 vote on the hideous moniker “Chinese Taipei” for international sporting events, offer a stern rebuttal to the periodic cry from commentators that radical Taiwanese could declare independence at any moment and plunge the region into war.
Given the choice of sending pointless messages, or pragmatically preserving relationships with the outside world, Taiwanese voters chose the latter. Time for some trust, world.
Photo: Chen Chih-chu, Taipei Times
NO ISSUE
The prohibition of ractopamine was lifted on Jan. 1 of last year, ending a long ban on the drug. President Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) had announced the decision on August 28, 2020. The government followed with a package of subsidies for farmers.
The move was widely expected to have a profoundly negative effect on the pork industry. A 2016 government study calculated that Taiwan’s pork farmers would take an NT$14.3 billion hit. Fear was widespread.
Photo: Chen Chih-chu, Taipei Times
The industry was in the doldrums, still reeling two decades after an outbreak of foot-and-mouth disease had destroyed Taiwan’s pork export market. Farmers claimed that consumers would give up pork completely.
A year later, the two-decade struggle over ractopamine, with its entertaining flip-flops by both major parties over the years, looks silly. Government figures released last February showed that pork consumption actually grew year on year the first month the ban was lifted.
The media hype instantly evaporated, a miniature case study: the international media was happy to hype ractopork tensions, but once it turned out there was no issue, and no more clicks to be had, it moved onto the next big hype. Articles that announce “nothing happened” don’t get eyes. Follow up? We need another piece on the fake claw machine “craze.”
Photo: Tsung Tsang-chin, Taipei Times
BEATING EXPECTATIONS
Many commentators expected the DPP and Tsai to take a popularity hit. Polls late in 2020 indicated disapproval of the ractopamine policy.
The Taiwan Public Opinion Foundation (TPOF) found that food security was an area of dissatisfaction (49 percent) in a December poll, while a November TPOF poll showed 66 percent disapproved of the decision to lift the ban. There were public protests, and the pro-China opposition parties staged events to highlight the farmers’ problems.
Photo: Lo Chi, Taipei Times
All that evaporated as pollsters lost interest (recall any recent polls on the question?). The president’s polling has been solid, and the DPP has by far the highest identification of any of the major parties. Nobody talks about ractopamine now. Taiwan produces more pork than it does the next three leading types of meat combined. Over 8 million pigs are slaughtered each year, the product of around 7,000 farms, 75 percent of which are considered small.
The industry is facing major problems this year. Pork prices have plummeted, yet feed prices have risen, squeezing small producers out of the business. Others have scaled back production hoping to push up prices. The government is putting in programs to help reduce the industry’s environmental effects and enhance its technologies.
On the pork industry’s long list of problems, imports from the US are a pimple. (The feed issue highlights Taiwan’s food security issues: 90 percent of it is imported, meaning that government attempts to get feed producers to increase output will have little effect on the overall situation. People often imagine Taiwan as nearly self-sufficient in pork, but in reality, pork is simply assembled rather than produced here. If Taiwan is blockaded, meat production will die off.)
Far from taking a hit, Tsai’s political gamble that the US would respond positively paid off in August of this year when the US announced for the 1,345,613th time that it would initiate negotiations on a bilateral trade agreement with Taiwan, launching the “US-Taiwan Initiative on 21st Century Trade” (the phrase “21st Century” indicates when the negotiations results will appear).
An article by a pair of prominent Asia watchers previously warned that it could be a while before the Biden administration even gets around to thinking about a trade agreement. In December of 2020 Biden, then president-elect, said he would not be rushing into trade deals.
Once again, the Tsai administration beat expectations and negative results did not occur.
CONTRASTING RESULTS
It is interesting to contrast the tranquil results of Tsai’s decision-making with that of the Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) administration. Recall that the ractopamine issue was brought up again by the Ma administration (which had begun ractopamine testing in 2011, though the DPP banned it in 2006, they had never tested for it), while negotiating the services pact with China.
It was not a coincidence that the KMT had revved up the ractopamine issue, but part of a strategy to use the issue to irritate relations with the US and push Taiwan toward China, a strategy it deployed again last year with the ractopamine referendum. It also exploited that issue in the Ma years to put the DPP at odds with US interests.
Yet, during the Ma years, the largest exporter of pork products to Taiwan was not the US, but Canada (which passed the US in 2009). If the effect of pork imports on Taiwan’s markets had really been the issue, Ma and the farmers would have complained more about Canada.
Tsai has reversed all that. With the announcement of large increases in defense spending in the next fiscal cycle, she has basically given Washington all it has asked for, quietly, reliably and pragmatically.
The president’s pragmatism and incrementalism are, by and large, the traits of her people. It’s time for the trope of a Taiwan populated by madmen ready to plunge the region into war to be banished from commentary. Madness is a trait of the sociopaths of Zhongnanhai, not the Taiwanese resisting them.
Time also to reward President Tsai with some reciprocity. Munitions, please, in quantity. And a trade pact.
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
June 2 to June 8 Taiwan’s woodcutters believe that if they see even one speck of red in their cooked rice, no matter how small, an accident is going to happen. Peng Chin-tian (彭錦田) swears that this has proven to be true at every stop during his decades-long career in the logging industry. Along with mining, timber harvesting was once considered the most dangerous profession in Taiwan. Not only were mishaps common during all stages of processing, it was difficult to transport the injured to get medical treatment. Many died during the arduous journey. Peng recounts some of his accidents in
“Why does Taiwan identity decline?”a group of researchers lead by University of Nevada political scientist Austin Wang (王宏恩) asked in a recent paper. After all, it is not difficult to explain the rise in Taiwanese identity after the early 1990s. But no model predicted its decline during the 2016-2018 period, they say. After testing various alternative explanations, Wang et al argue that the fall-off in Taiwanese identity during that period is related to voter hedging based on the performance of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Since the DPP is perceived as the guardian of Taiwan identity, when it performs well,
A short walk beneath the dense Amazon canopy, the forest abruptly opens up. Fallen logs are rotting, the trees grow sparser and the temperature rises in places sunlight hits the ground. This is what 24 years of severe drought looks like in the world’s largest rainforest. But this patch of degraded forest, about the size of a soccer field, is a scientific experiment. Launched in 2000 by Brazilian and British scientists, Esecaflor — short for “Forest Drought Study Project” in Portuguese — set out to simulate a future in which the changing climate could deplete the Amazon of rainfall. It is
The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on May 18 held a rally in Taichung to mark the anniversary of President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20. The title of the rally could be loosely translated to “May 18 recall fraudulent goods” (518退貨ㄌㄨㄚˋ！). Unlike in English, where the terms are the same, “recall” (退貨) in this context refers to product recalls due to damaged, defective or fraudulent merchandise, not the political recalls (罷免) currently dominating the headlines. I attended the rally to determine if the impression was correct that the TPP under party Chairman Huang Kuo-Chang (黃國昌) had little of a
RSS