Five armed policemen barged into Sanmin Bookstore (三民書局) on the morning of March 10, 1947, demanding to see owner Chiang Wei-chuan (蔣渭川).
“We’re here to shoot you to death!” one yelled when Chiang appeared and asked what they wanted. Chiang was shocked; just a few days earlier he was negotiating with governor general Chen Yi (陳儀) for political reform and making broadcasts to help pacify the people after the anti-government uprising on Feb. 28.
Chen was just buying time. Everything changed once the Chinese Nationalist Party’s (KMT) reinforcements arrived from China on March 8. Martial Law was declared the following day, and Chiang recalls in his account of the events hearing gunshots all day as troops poured into the city and began the brutal punitive campaign.
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
He was about to visit Chen and find out what was going on when the police arrived.
“I’m going to see the chief now. We can talk this out face to face,” Chiang replied, but the officers tried to drag him outside.
Chiang’s wife tried to intervene but was quickly subdued, and one of them fired two shots at Chiang’s head. Both bullets miraculously jammed, and Chiang fled out the back door as the officer tried to fix his gun.
Photo courtesy of 228 Memorial Museum
The policemen gave chase and finally got a shot off, accidentally hitting Chiang’s terrified six-year-old son and 17-year-old daughter who tried to protect the boy. The daughter, Chiang Chiao-yun (蔣巧雲), died in the hospital two weeks later.
Despite his personal tragedy, Chiang was a long-vilified figure due to his unfortunate role in the 228 Incident. It also didn’t help that unlike his comrades who were killed or jailed, the KMT pardoned him and appointed him to high-ranking positions. His family has spent the last 30 years trying to clear his name, and today he’s seen more as a victim of the times.
ACTIVIST IN TWO ERAS
Photo courtesy of Wikimedia Commons
Chiang Wei-chuan had been politically active since the Japanese colonial era, fighting for Taiwanese interests — especially labor rights — alongside his famous older brother and democracy pioneer Chiang Wei-shui (蔣渭水).
Chiang Wei-shui died shortly after the government shut down his Taiwan People’s Party (台灣民眾黨) in 1931. Despite their crackdown on dissent, the Japanese allowed (very limited) local elections; Chiang Wei-chuan was elected Taipei city councilor in 1939.
Like many Taiwanese, Chiang was initially very happy to return to the “motherland” after the Japanese defeat in August 1945. He immediately joined the KMT and encouraged his comrades to do so as well. After more than a decade of silence, Taiwanese activist groups were eager to resume activity and perhaps even reform the Taiwan People’s Party, but the KMT made it clear that no other political entities were allowed. They also ordered existing civil organizations to temporarily cease activity and undergo inspection.
Photo courtesy of 228 Memorial Museum
After spending so many years fighting the Japanese for political freedom, the activists were greatly disheartened by the KMT’s attitude. These former rivals banded together and launched the Taiwan People’s Association (台灣民眾協會) on Jan. 6, 1946 at Sanmin Bookstore with 14 branches across the island.
Chiang recounts in Chiang Wei-chuan and His Era (蔣渭川與他的年代) that the goal was to serve as a bridge between the increasingly unhappy Taiwanese and KMT officials. They also hoped to work with the government to achieve democracy as soon as possible.
“The atmosphere in society had greatly declined by the time the association was formed,” Chiang writes. “Inflation was rampant, unemployment soared and people could barely make ends meet. Bandits roamed the street in broad daylight, and the newspapers reported on entire families committing suicide. Although the situation was not uncommon for a post-war nation, people blamed the corrupt officials and those who colluded with them. Angry voices could be heard all across [Taiwan], and the association was faced with an immensely difficult task.”
PUSHING DEMOCRACY
Less than two weeks after the association’s founding in early 1946, Chen ordered a number of activist groups to disband. The association survived and pledged allegiance to the government, but they started organizing public hearings for people to air their grievances and in February presented 21 requests to Lee Wen-fan (李文範), a KMT envoy visiting Taiwan. The first one was “eliminate all discrimination against Taiwanese,” but the pressing problem was the soaring price of rice.
Chen’s responses were mostly vague and unhelpful, and the following day association chairman Chang Pang-chieh (張邦傑) was removed from his public post and forced out of Taiwan. In March, the government ordered the association to change its name to the Taiwan Provincial Political Construction Association (臺灣省政治建設協會).
While many association members participated in the local and provincial council elections in March and April 1946, Chen was reluctant to allow direct polls for county commissioner, mayor and other local chiefs. He announced that such elections would be delayed until 1949, sparking an intensive campaign by the association that continued over up to the 228 Incident a year later. The last event was held in Tamsui on Feb. 24, 1947 with more than 1,000 attendees cheering until late at night.
The election issue remained one of the main talking points during the post-228 Incident negotiations. The government asked Chiang, who had helped maintain order during an earlier incident, to help pacify the masses. He agreed if Chen promised to not punish those who partook in the uprising, release all those who were arrested, compensate the injured or dead and punish the Tobacco Monopoly Bureau agent who triggered the incident.
The desperate Chen agreed, and on March 2, Chiang made the first of five nationwide broadcasts telling people to remain calm and that the government was willing to work things out. He continued to personally negotiate with Chen, and on March 5 he had an associate sneak into the US embassy to relay a telegram to the KMT’s Nanjing headquarters in the name of the association:
“This commotion in Taiwan is purely in response to local corruption, and only seeks political reform. We entreat you not to send any troops to Taiwan to avoid further angering the people, and we beg you, for this nation’s sake, immediately send a high-ranking official here to mediate the situation.”
Chen played along until the very end, even publicly announcing on March 6 that he would employ more Taiwanese in higher positions and hold direct elections on July 1, 1947.
USED BY THE KMT?
Chiang’s account of the incident indicates that he genuinely believed in Chen’s false promises despite many warning him that the government was using him to buy time. Once the reinforcements arrived, Chen rejected all of the committee’s demands and the bloodbath began.
After Chiang narrowly avoided death, at least seven association leaders were arrested and never were heard from again. Chen ordered the association to disband on March 13, and countless more members were detained and imprisoned or executed. Chiang went into hiding for a year, until Chiu Nian-tai (丘念台) persuaded the government to pardon him. He was appointed head of civil affairs in 1949, and deputy minister of the interior the following year.
Several sources indicate that Chiang was at least partially pressured into the role to appease the Americans, who liked him and wanted to see more Taiwanese in the government. The KMT had lost the Chinese Civil War by then and was desperate for US support. Chiang served in different capacities until the 1960s, and died in 1975.
In 1991, his family published his account of the 228 Incident, sending it to scholars across Taiwan hoping to rehabilitate his image. They continued to unearth evidence in the following years, including US government documents, and the effort continues to this day as granddaughter Chiang Li-jung (蔣理容) published last November a novel based on Chiang’s diaries and conversations with her mother.
Taiwan in Time, a column about Taiwan’s history that is published every Sunday, spotlights important or interesting events around the nation that either have anniversaries this week or are tied to current events.
US President Donald Trump may have hoped for an impromptu talk with his old friend Kim Jong-un during a recent trip to Asia, but analysts say the increasingly emboldened North Korean despot had few good reasons to join the photo-op. Trump sent repeated overtures to Kim during his barnstorming tour of Asia, saying he was “100 percent” open to a meeting and even bucking decades of US policy by conceding that North Korea was “sort of a nuclear power.” But Pyongyang kept mum on the invitation, instead firing off missiles and sending its foreign minister to Russia and Belarus, with whom it
When Taiwan was battered by storms this summer, the only crumb of comfort I could take was knowing that some advice I’d drafted several weeks earlier had been correct. Regarding the Southern Cross-Island Highway (南橫公路), a spectacular high-elevation route connecting Taiwan’s southwest with the country’s southeast, I’d written: “The precarious existence of this road cannot be overstated; those hoping to drive or ride all the way across should have a backup plan.” As this article was going to press, the middle section of the highway, between Meishankou (梅山口) in Kaohsiung and Siangyang (向陽) in Taitung County, was still closed to outsiders
President William Lai (賴清德) has championed Taiwan as an “AI Island” — an artificial intelligence (AI) hub powering the global tech economy. But without major shifts in talent, funding and strategic direction, this vision risks becoming a static fortress: indispensable, yet immobile and vulnerable. It’s time to reframe Taiwan’s ambition. Time to move from a resource-rich AI island to an AI Armada. Why change metaphors? Because choosing the right metaphor shapes both understanding and strategy. The “AI Island” frames our national ambition as a static fortress that, while valuable, is still vulnerable and reactive. Shifting our metaphor to an “AI Armada”
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has a dystopian, radical and dangerous conception of itself. Few are aware of this very fundamental difference between how they view power and how the rest of the world does. Even those of us who have lived in China sometimes fall back into the trap of viewing it through the lens of the power relationships common throughout the rest of the world, instead of understanding the CCP as it conceives of itself. Broadly speaking, the concepts of the people, race, culture, civilization, nation, government and religion are separate, though often overlapping and intertwined. A government
RSS