The importance of biodiversity is well understood. A diverse biosphere is better able to provide ecosystem services, those tangible and intangible benefits that humans obtain from ecosystems. These include: foods that can be grown, gathered, hunted or trapped; plant pollination; useful materials such as timber and bamboo; clean air and water; the regulation of flooding and soil erosion; and non-material benefits such as recreation and cultural enrichment.
The greatest biodiversity is found in certain places untouched by agriculture or industry. Urbanization is usually harmful for native animals, which suffer as their original habitats shrink and are fragmented. For this reason, nature-lovers in Taiwan — just like their counterparts elsewhere — often fetishize wildernesses, while ignoring the cities in which more than 80 percent of the country’s population lives.
Such thinking shows an incomplete understanding of cities’ ecological functions, argue the authors of a paper published in the February issue of BioScience.
Photo: Steven Crook
CONSERVATION
In “The Biological Deserts Fallacy: Cities in Their Landscapes Contribute More than We Think to Regional Biodiversity,” scientists affiliated with the San Francisco Estuary Institute assert that not only do many urban areas harbor greater biodiversity than even many specialists suspect, cities also have the potential to make important contributions to global biodiversity conservation as the impact of climate change on nature grows.
Researchers in Australia have identified 39 species, among them plants, a type of tortoise and a kind of snail, that now cling to existence only in urban habitats.
Photo: Steven Crook
In an article posted by the Environmental Information Center (環境資訊中心, e-info.org.tw) late last year, Lee Yu-chin (李育琴) explains how tidiness can be an enemy of biodiversity.
Lee writes that citizens expect neatly trimmed trees and the removal of dead leaves from parks, not knowing that “fallen leaves nourish microorganisms in the soil [and] seemingly useless deadwood is also home to insects and some birds.”
The Taiwan barbet is one such bird. This endemic species, colloquially known as the “five-color bird” (wuseniao, 五色鳥), prefers to nest in cavities in dead tree trunks.
Photo: Steven Crook
Because Taiwan barbets were struggling to find suitable nesting sites in Taipei, since 2015 the city government has been working with the Taiwan Forestry Research Institute to install squirrel-proof nesting boxes in various parks.
Lee says that even mundane encounters between city dwellers and wild creatures can inspire people to think about environmental issues. The authors of the BioScience paper make the same point this way: “The close proximity of people to nature in cities creates opportunities for public engagement through education, citizen science and stewardship programs.”
They add that this is just one of five ways in which bolstering biodiversity in urban areas can benefit entire countries.
Photo: Steven Crook
Of the others, the first is that cities provide plant and animal populations with alternative or additional water and food resources during periods of stress and scarcity in the surrounding landscape.
The appearance of Crested goshawks — which can be found up to 1,800m above sea level — in the centers of Taipei and Taichung isn’t merely a consequence of those places offering abundant food in the form of rodents, doves and sparrows.
These raptors enjoy greater breeding success in built-up neighborhoods than in rural areas. The risk of human disturbance is greater in the former than in the latter, but the absence of snakes (which prey on eggs and nestlings) and macaques (which harass the birds) seems to more than make up for this.
The second, that cities “can increase regional habitat heterogeneity” isn’t so relevant to Taiwan. Tremendous variations in topography, soil types and human land-use practices across the island mean there isn’t so much a lack of habitat variation, as a shortage of space where wild creatures can thrive.
Thirdly, cities serve as stopover sites for species as they migrate. Taipei’s Guandu Nature Park (關渡自然公園) and Huajiang Waterfowl Park (華江雁鴨自然公園) are migrant-waterbird magnets.
Fourthly, the manner in which cities can contribute to species’ genetic diversity could prepare them for a hotter, dirtier planet.
Temperatures in cities are typically 2 or 3 degrees Celsius higher than those in surrounding locations at the same elevation. However, due to human activities that generate heat (such as driving), an absence of shade and the way in which concrete and tarmac retain the sun’s warmth, the difference is sometimes as great as 9 degrees Celsius.
The BioScience paper highlights adaptations to higher temperatures “have the potential to create populations that may be better able to tolerate future conditions caused by climate change.” It points out that studies have identified urban populations of certain plant, ant and flea species that already display greater heat tolerance than their rural cousins.
WHAT CAN WE DO?
Individuals and communities can do a great deal to preserve and increase biodiversity in urban neighborhoods. In some situations, simply not doing what’s usually done would be a change for the better.
The use of pesticides and artificial fertilizers should be minimized.
Because they maim grasshoppers and crickets, leafblowers are thought to be a factor in the huge decline in insect numbers that’s been recorded. On top of the air and noise pollution they generate, these devices erode and compact topsoil. Removing leaves should be done with a rake, if at all.
In cities, there can never be too much greenery. In addition to being a haven for insects, any patch of foliage reduces temperatures by evapotranspiration. Leaves also slow down raindrops (desirable in a flood-prone country like Taiwan), trap particulate pollution and muffle noise.
Anyone with a balcony or unused roof space can do their bit. Since 2015, Taipei’s Community Agriculture Promotion Center (田園城市社區園圃推廣中心) has been encouraging the creation of vegetable gardens on campuses and rooftops. Earlier this summer, the center worked with Hsi Liu Environmental Greening Foundation (錫?環境綠化基金會) to hold online classes that showed how a small balcony can be turned into a garden.
Some green buildings incorporate low-maintenance “biodiversity ledges” — external shelves, far narrower and shallower than any balcony, typically planted with drought-resistant but insect-friendly plant species.
Adding low-cost features to major construction projects can make them far more biodiversity-friendly.
At Rende Detention Basin (仁德滯洪池), just west of Freeway 1 in the suburbs of Tainan, the authorities have installed “raptor rest stops” and “insect hotels,” as well as information boards that explain the functions of these structures to the public.
The “rest stops” are small platforms on which birds of prey can pause between hunts or while digesting food. The “hotels” contain deadwood, straw and other natural materials in which insects like to shelter from the elements.
Compared to an issue like microplastics pollution, the protection and possible expansion of urban biodiversity looks straightforward and inexpensive. We shouldn’t let bad habits and a lack of imagination hold us back.
Steven Crook, the author or co-author of four books about Taiwan, has been following environmental issues since he arrived in the country in 1991. He drives a hybrid and carries his own chopsticks. The views expressed here are his own.
Last week the government announced that by year’s end Taiwan will have the highest density of anti-ship missiles in the world. Its inventory could exceed 1,400, or enough for the opening two hours of an invasion from the People’s Republic of China (PRC). Snark aside, it sounds impressive. But an important piece is missing. Lost in all the “dialogues” and “debates” and “discussions” whose sole purpose is simply to dawdle and delay is what the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) alternative special defense budget proposal means for the defense of Taiwan. It is a betrayal of both Taiwan and the US. IT’S
March 16 to March 22 Hidden for decades behind junk-filled metal shacks, trees and overgrowth, a small domed structure bearing a Buddhist swastika resurfaced last June in a Taichung alley. It was soon identified as a remnant of the 122-year-old Gokokuzan Taichuu-ji (Taichung Temple, 護國山台中寺), which was thought to have been demolished in the 1980s. In addition, a stone stele dedicated to monk Hoshu Ono, who served as abbot from 1914 to 1930, was discovered in the detritus. The temple was established in 1903 as the local center for the Soto school
Paul Thomas Anderson’s “One Battle After Another” was crowned best picture at the 98th Academy Awards, handing Hollywood’s top honor to a comic, multi-generational American saga of political resistance. The ceremony Sunday, which also saw Michael B. Jordan win best actor and “Sinners” cinematographer Autumn Durald Arkapaw make Oscar history as the first female director of photography to win the award, was a long-in-coming coronation for Anderson, a San Fernando Valley native who made his first short at age 18 and has been one of America’s most lionized filmmakers for decades. Before Sunday, Anderson had never won an Oscar. But “One Battle
In Kaohsiung’s Indigenous People’s Park (原住民主題公園), the dance group Push Hands is training. All its members are from Taiwan’s indigenous community, but their vibe is closer to that of a modern, urban hip-hop posse. MIXING CULTURES “The name Push Hands comes from the idea of pushing away tradition to expand our culture,” says Ljakuon (洪濬嚴), the 44-year-old founder and main teacher of the dance group. This is what makes Push Hands unique: while retaining their Aboriginal roots, and even reconnecting with them, they are adamant about doing something modern. Ljakuon started the group 20 years ago, initially with the sole intention of doing hip-hop dancing.
RSS