This pleasant and easy-to-follow book aims to investigate the hostility the author thinks exists between Japan, South Korea and China, plus (almost as an afterthought) an antagonism he claims to exist in Taiwan towards South Korea. He pursues his prime purpose by undertaking a journey that begins and ends in Taipei and involves traveling to Tokyo, journeying south, and then crossing to South Korea. Once there he goes north in zigzag fashion until he reaches the border of North Korea. He then crosses to China, goes up to Harbin, and makes his way south all the way to Hong Kong, and from there back to Taipei.
The author engages on his investigation partly by looking at the histories of the countries he travels through, but mostly by talking to minorities within the countries themselves. He shows his skills early on when looking at the status of Koreans in Japan. He discovers there are roughly half a million people living in Japan of Korean ancestry, called zainichi. Those with connections to South Korea are called mindan, those connected to the north chongryon. There are many schools that teach Korean language and culture, and the extraordinary fact the author unearths is that most of them are funded by Pyongyang.
Hostility to Koreans in Japan is apparently widespread, and many long-term residents from Korea attempt to disguise their origins by changing their names. Our author sees this hostility as having it roots in Japan adopting the same quasi-colonialist policy towards Korea in the 19th century as the US had adopted to Japan itself. But even so, he expresses enormous liking and sympathy for the Japanese whenever the occasion arises, and this will, we quickly discover, set the tone for the rest of the book.
As well as interviewing people with Korean connections, Michael Booth also travels extensively throughout central Japan, discussing what he sees in its own right. Thus he discovers that the controversial Yasukuni Shrine to the war dead is considered a difficult issue even by ordinary Japanese, who often refer to it as “the Yasukuni problem.”
In South Korea, Booth finds that, though past wars with Japan, including one where noses were cut off to prove how many Koreans had been killed, had left animosity, the young in general adored Japan and did everything they could to get there.
Generally, however, the Korean chapters are about Korea itself, not attitudes to foreigners living there. There’s K-pop, male cosmetics, suicides, smart phones (these last three more common than in any other country on Earth) and past dictatorships and their atrocities. All this goes to show that Three Tigers, One Mountain is as much an overview of the region as an investigation into specific inter-racial hostilities, its ostensible subject.
The section on China begins with the notorious Unit 731, Japan’s germ warfare station during their invasion of China, near Harbin. Booth encounters continuing hostility to the Japanese later on, when a Taiwanese historian teaching in Shanghai, Chang Chih-yun, says that his students think of them as “Barbarians. Savages. Devils. Japanese devils, that’s the common take.” Even so, nearly eight million tourists visited Japan from China in 2018.
Booth thinks he would like to live in Nanjing. He also meets someone there who thinks Japanese society is among the most civilized anywhere in the world, but laments the fact that its politicians make sure the Nanjing Massacre of 1937-38 is given scant coverage in Japanese school textbooks. And in Shanghai he finds a widespread reluctance to talk about the fact that there were Chinese “comfort woman” during World War II as well as Korean ones.
When he reaches Hong Kong, Booth feels he’s bristling with excitement at the energy and geographical unlikeliness of the place. Even his over-arching theory that it was the British who were responsible for most of East Asia’s woes, rather than the Americans, gets successfully argued against. After a brief stay, however, he moves back to where he started from, Taipei.
The full title of this book is Three Tigers, One Mountain: A Journey Through the Bitter History and Current Conflicts of China, Korea and Japan and refers to a Chinese proverb that two tigers can’t share the same mountain.
Strangely enough, the first thing I heard of about this book concerned the alleged anti-Korean bias in Taiwan. This turns out, though, to amount to only a very few pages, and be based on chats with three named people and one anonymous commentator. Booth’s most illustrious source is the politician Hsu Yu-jen, who he refers to as Jason Hsu without mentioning that there is another Taiwanese in the public eye with the same name. The political Jason Hsu is quoted as saying “Taiwanese people loathe South Koreans. It goes back to when South Korea broke ties with Taiwan in favor of China in the early 1980s.”
Apart from this bizarre opinion, which the author of the book has admitted to a learned foreign resident of Taiwan was a misplaced late addition, Taiwan gets political coverage but little of the geographical input afforded to Japan, South Korea and China. Booth’s view is nonetheless very positive. Taiwan is a beacon of democracy, free speech and human rights in East Asia, he rightly holds.
“The young Chinese people I spoke to told me that it was to Taiwan, not Japan, Europe, or the United States, that they looked to for pop culture trends in fashion, design and food,” he writes. “Young Chinese are chasing authenticity. Taiwan is at the forefront in the Mandarin world in terms of the hipster scene, the artisanal baristas, craft beer, that loose, woolen, natural clothing … the vegan look.”
All in all, the truth of the matter may well be that of the four nations treated in this book, Taiwan is the only one that has no serious problems with anyone else, the obvious differences with Beijing excepted. This is an enjoyable book and by and large highly recommended.
Before the recall election drowned out other news, CNN last month became the latest in a long line of media organs to report on abuses of migrant workers in Taiwan’s fishing fleet. After a brief flare of interest, the news media moved on. The migrant worker issues, however, did not. CNN’s stinging title, “Taiwan is held up as a bastion of liberal values. But migrant workers report abuse, injury and death in its fishing industry,” was widely quoted, including by the Fisheries Agency in its response. It obviously hurt. The Fisheries Agency was not slow to convey a classic government
It was on his honeymoon in Kuala Lumpur, looking out of his hotel window at the silvery points of the world’s tallest twin skyscrapers, that Frank decided it was time to become taller. He had recently confessed to his new wife how much his height had bothered him since he was a teenager. As a man dedicated to self-improvement, Frank wanted to take action. He picked up the phone, called a clinic in Turkey that specializes in leg lengthening surgery — and made a booking. “I had a lot of second thoughts — at the end of the day, someone’s going
Not long into Mistress Dispeller, a quietly jaw-dropping new documentary from director Elizabeth Lo, the film’s eponymous character lays out her thesis for ridding marriages of troublesome extra lovers. “When someone becomes a mistress,” she says, “it’s because they feel they don’t deserve complete love. She’s the one who needs our help the most.” Wang Zhenxi, a mistress dispeller based in north-central China’s Henan province, is one of a growing number of self-styled professionals who earn a living by intervening in people’s marriages — to “dispel” them of intruders. “I was looking for a love story set in China,” says Lo,
It turns out many Americans aren’t great at identifying which personal decisions contribute most to climate change. A study recently published by the National Academy of Sciences found that when asked to rank actions, such as swapping a car that uses gasoline for an electric one, carpooling or reducing food waste, participants weren’t very accurate when assessing how much those actions contributed to climate change, which is caused mostly by the release of greenhouse gases that happen when fuels like gasoline, oil and coal are burned. “People over-assign impact to actually pretty low-impact actions such as recycling, and underestimate the actual carbon
RSS