Eighty years ago on the brink of the bloodiest conflict in history, Adolf Hitler was nominated for the Nobel Peace Prize, illustrating that literally anyone can be nominated.
From the Fuhrer to the “King of Pop,” in the nearly 120 years the prize has been awarded nominations have included some choices that — to say the least — have seemed unlikely and outright bizarre.
In January 1939, about eight months before the invasion of Poland, Swedish Social Democratic MP Erik Brandt wrote to the Norwegian Nobel Committee to suggest the Peace Prize should be given to Hitler.
Photo: REUTERS
In the letter, written only months after the annexation of Austria and the Sudeten Crisis, Brandt praised the leader of the Third Reich’s “glowing love for peace,” dubbing him “the Prince of Peace on Earth.”
Brandt later explained the nomination was meant to be satirical — although the irony was lost on many — and was in protest against British prime minister Neville Chamberlain being nominated for the 1938 Munich Agreement in which part of Czechoslovakia was ceded to Germany.
The logic was that if Chamberlain were to be celebrated for appeasing Hitler, the Fuhrer might as well be too.
Photo: REUTERS
Brandt eventually withdrew the nomination, but Hitler still appears as a candidate in the archives.
“The history of Erik Brandt’s nomination of Adolf Hitler fully shows how dangerous it may be to use irony in a heated political setting,” Nobel historian Asle Sveen said.
STALIN AND MUSSOLINI TOO
The Nobel Committee accepts all proposals as long as they are sent before the Jan. 31 deadline.
But while anyone alive can be nominated, not just anyone can submit a nomination.
Those eligible to do so include parliamentarians and ministers from all countries, former laureates, some university professors and current and former members of the committee itself. All together they number in the thousands.
“There are so many people who have the right to nominate a candidate that it’s not very complicated to be nominated,” the influential committee secretary, Olav Njolstad, said.
In 1935, Italian dictator Benito Mussolini was proposed, ironically, by German and French academics mere months before his country invaded Ethiopia.
As one of the victors of World War II, Russian leader Joseph Stalin was nominated twice, in 1945 and 1948.
Once the deadline has passed and the nominations are in, only a handful are kept on a shortlist to be reviewed by the committee and its advisors.
“Neither Hitler, Stalin nor Mussolini were seriously considered for the Peace Prize,” historian Geir Lundestad, former secretary of the Committee, said. “What surprises me most is that many dictators around the world have refrained from getting themselves nominated.”
Over the last two decades the number of candidates has skyrocketed and today generally exceed 300, so it isn’t too surprising that a few odd names show up.
“One or two” nominations distinguished by their peculiarity show up “at regular intervals,” according to Njolstad.
FROM POP TO PEACE
The list of candidates is kept confidential for at least 50 years, but a sponsor can publicly announce their pick.
Whether a nomination is odd or not is of course a matter of perspective, but some proposals would certainly make most people do a double-take.
In 2001 the sport of football represented by the international football federation FIFA was nominated.
The Swedish lawmaker behind the nomination argued that sports had the “ability to create positive international contacts” and contribute to a “more peaceful world.”
This wasn’t even that novel of an idea, since Jules Rimet, who initiated the first World Cup, had also been nominated in 1956, noted journalist Antoine Jacob, author of “History of the Nobel Prize.”
Pop icon Michael Jackson found himself in the running in 1998. Even though many of the child sex abuse allegations against the “King of Pop” had not surfaced at the time, the artist’s message to “Heal the World” did not impress the committee.
“The Romanian parliamentarians who proposed Michael Jackson considered this nomination to be very serious, but it was not considered by the committee either,” said Lundestad.
But in 2001 Lundestad also said it didn’t seem impossible that famous musicians involved in causes, such as Bob Geldof, Bono or Sting could one day receive the award.
“Artists’ names come in regularly, but it’s a more recent trend,” explained Njolstad.
Among this year’s known nominations for the Nobel Peace Prize, which will be awarded on Friday, are US President Donald Trump and Swedish climate activist Greta Thunberg.
However Lundestad insists that one shouldn’t get too excited over just a nomination.
“It’s pretty easy to be nominated,” he said. “It’s much harder to win.”
President William Lai (賴清德) yesterday delivered an address marking the first anniversary of his presidency. In the speech, Lai affirmed Taiwan’s global role in technology, trade and security. He announced economic and national security initiatives, and emphasized democratic values and cross-party cooperation. The following is the full text of his speech: Yesterday, outside of Beida Elementary School in New Taipei City’s Sanxia District (三峽), there was a major traffic accident that, sadly, claimed several lives and resulted in multiple injuries. The Executive Yuan immediately formed a task force, and last night I personally visited the victims in hospital. Central government agencies and the
Australia’s ABC last week published a piece on the recall campaign. The article emphasized the divisions in Taiwanese society and blamed the recall for worsening them. It quotes a supporter of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) as saying “I’m 43 years old, born and raised here, and I’ve never seen the country this divided in my entire life.” Apparently, as an adult, she slept through the post-election violence in 2000 and 2004 by the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT), the veiled coup threats by the military when Chen Shui-bian (陳水扁) became president, the 2006 Red Shirt protests against him ginned up by
As with most of northern Thailand’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) settlements, the village of Arunothai was only given a Thai name once the Thai government began in the 1970s to assert control over the border region and initiate a decades-long process of political integration. The village’s original name, bestowed by its Yunnanese founders when they first settled the valley in the late 1960s, was a Chinese name, Dagudi (大谷地), which literally translates as “a place for threshing rice.” At that time, these village founders did not know how permanent their settlement would be. Most of Arunothai’s first generation were soldiers
Among Thailand’s Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) villages, a certain rivalry exists between Arunothai, the largest of these villages, and Mae Salong, which is currently the most prosperous. Historically, the rivalry stems from a split in KMT military factions in the early 1960s, which divided command and opium territories after Chiang Kai-shek (蔣介石) cut off open support in 1961 due to international pressure (see part two, “The KMT opium lords of the Golden Triangle,” on May 20). But today this rivalry manifests as a different kind of split, with Arunothai leading a pro-China faction and Mae Salong staunchly aligned to Taiwan.
RSS