In Economic Development of Emerging East Asia: Catching up of Taiwan and South Korea, Professors Frank Hsiao (蕭聖鐵) and Mei-Chu Wang Hsiao (蕭王美珠) have taken up where they left off in examining economic development in East Asia.
This work extends beyond their earlier work, Economic Development of Taiwan, Early Experiences and the Pacific Trade Triangle reviewed in the Taipei Times (“Re-examining the Taiwan Miracle,” June 18, 2015) and compares Taiwan’s economic development with that of South Korea and Japan.
However, readers should be forewarned; this highly researched book is not a quick read. Replete with tables, figures and graphs that compare Capital Flow and Exchange Rates and Productivity Growth, it primarily seeks insights as it determines each nation’s GDP per Capita in terms of Purchasing Power Parity.
The book is suited to those with a strong technical research interest on the economic development of East Asia, but its end hope is that such results can also provide direction for the emerging economies of African and Latin American countries.
The book has two parts: Part One focuses on the comparative economic growth and development of Taiwan and Korea; Part Two examines the “catching up and convergence” of those two with Japan and then that of all three with the US.
While it is not a quick read and delves into over a century of economic development, this book nonetheless has several immediate strong points for the average reader.
First, each chapter begins with an explanatory abstract to prep the reader for the technical data that follows, and has concluding remarks that review key points.
Additionally, all chapters, except for the final ninth chapter, have appeared in economic journals. Thus, each chapter has already undergone steep individual vetting on its research quality and information. This also explains why each chapter has anywhere from 20 to 50 or more references at its end.
The work further provides an additional contrasting and provocative perspective: an emphasis on the beneficial and influential aspects of Japan’s colonialism on the developing economies of Korea and Taiwan. This positive emphasis on colonialism will, no doubt, not play as well in Korea, since the two nations have had totally different colonial background experiences.
Chapter 5, the final chapter in Part One, diverges from the Korea/Taiwan comparisons. It contrasts India’s colonial benefits under the UK with those of Taiwan, especially in light of each nation’s postwar economic development. Surprisingly and against expectations of size, Taiwan has fared the better of the two. This is attributed to Japan’s specific emphasis on health and education.
In Part Two, chapters six through eight examine the convergence of the economies of Korea, Taiwan and Japan. Here, both Korea and Taiwan are held as role models for successful development.
Still, while these chapters focus on the development of countries in the Asian Miracle from the 1970s up until the 1997 recession, the authors also have a word of caution. Any development no matter how good has its limits as the recession brought out. Nothing is guaranteed.
Nonetheless, it was after this period, that by 2010, Korea had pretty well caught up with Taiwan and both of course are seen gaining on Japan.
As in their earlier book on the Taiwan Miracle, Taiwan’s “outstanding economic performance and catching-up process” in GDP is often the result of the “hardworking Taiwanese.” Their performance is “stellar and astonishing” in comparison with other countries in the region.
A key factor in Taiwan’s success is that it became the “Republic of Technology” and had the colonial base of an advanced country. One may be tempted to feel this is a natural bias, but any challenge must be done to the figures and charts provided to support such claims.
It is in the final chapter, that the question and role of China in Taiwan’s economic development is addressed. This key issue is one that is raised by three prepublication reviewers when they asked the inevitable: “Does Taiwan’s economy rely too much on China’s larger economy?”
The answer is that “for catching up in terms of GDP per capita, economic size may not matter.” However, this does not deny that China can be a very influential and powerful nation in the region.
As said, this work is highly technical and aspects of it may be more suited to those in the social sciences and economics. With its many charts and technical references, the authors even suggest it could be used as a text book or model for “writing research papers in regional development studies.”
Finally, every book risks being dated as soon as it comes out. So now one wonders whether the authors would reconsider any responses in lieu of the potential impact on Asian economies by US President Donald Trump imposing newly threatened tariffs. Or, would the passage of the Taiwan Travel Act positively or negatively impact economic matters in the region?
Regardless, the authors conclude with a final optimistic note: All data indicates not only that East Asia is still economically emerging but there also appears “no reason to discount the future possibility of an Asia-centered world economy.”
That US assistance was a model for Taiwan’s spectacular development success was early recognized by policymakers and analysts. In a report to the US Congress for the fiscal year 1962, former President John F. Kennedy noted Taiwan’s “rapid economic growth,” was “producing a substantial net gain in living.” Kennedy had a stake in Taiwan’s achievements and the US’ official development assistance (ODA) in general: In September 1961, his entreaty to make the 1960s a “decade of development,” and an accompanying proposal for dedicated legislation to this end, had been formalized by congressional passage of the Foreign Assistance Act. Two
Despite the intense sunshine, we were hardly breaking a sweat as we cruised along the flat, dedicated bike lane, well protected from the heat by a canopy of trees. The electric assist on the bikes likely made a difference, too. Far removed from the bustle and noise of the Taichung traffic, we admired the serene rural scenery, making our way over rivers, alongside rice paddies and through pear orchards. Our route for the day covered two bike paths that connect in Fengyuan District (豐原) and are best done together. The Hou-Feng Bike Path (后豐鐵馬道) runs southward from Houli District (后里) while the
March 31 to April 6 On May 13, 1950, National Taiwan University Hospital otolaryngologist Su You-peng (蘇友鵬) was summoned to the director’s office. He thought someone had complained about him practicing the violin at night, but when he entered the room, he knew something was terribly wrong. He saw several burly men who appeared to be government secret agents, and three other resident doctors: internist Hsu Chiang (許強), dermatologist Hu Pao-chen (胡寶珍) and ophthalmologist Hu Hsin-lin (胡鑫麟). They were handcuffed, herded onto two jeeps and taken to the Secrecy Bureau (保密局) for questioning. Su was still in his doctor’s robes at
Mirror mirror on the wall, what’s the fairest Disney live-action remake of them all? Wait, mirror. Hold on a second. Maybe choosing from the likes of Alice in Wonderland (2010), Mulan (2020) and The Lion King (2019) isn’t such a good idea. Mirror, on second thought, what’s on Netflix? Even the most devoted fans would have to acknowledge that these have not been the most illustrious illustrations of Disney magic. At their best (Pete’s Dragon? Cinderella?) they breathe life into old classics that could use a little updating. At their worst, well, blue Will Smith. Given the rapacious rate of remakes in modern
RSS