In Economic Development of Emerging East Asia: Catching up of Taiwan and South Korea, Professors Frank Hsiao (蕭聖鐵) and Mei-Chu Wang Hsiao (蕭王美珠) have taken up where they left off in examining economic development in East Asia.
This work extends beyond their earlier work, Economic Development of Taiwan, Early Experiences and the Pacific Trade Triangle reviewed in the Taipei Times (“Re-examining the Taiwan Miracle,” June 18, 2015) and compares Taiwan’s economic development with that of South Korea and Japan.
However, readers should be forewarned; this highly researched book is not a quick read. Replete with tables, figures and graphs that compare Capital Flow and Exchange Rates and Productivity Growth, it primarily seeks insights as it determines each nation’s GDP per Capita in terms of Purchasing Power Parity.
The book is suited to those with a strong technical research interest on the economic development of East Asia, but its end hope is that such results can also provide direction for the emerging economies of African and Latin American countries.
The book has two parts: Part One focuses on the comparative economic growth and development of Taiwan and Korea; Part Two examines the “catching up and convergence” of those two with Japan and then that of all three with the US.
While it is not a quick read and delves into over a century of economic development, this book nonetheless has several immediate strong points for the average reader.
First, each chapter begins with an explanatory abstract to prep the reader for the technical data that follows, and has concluding remarks that review key points.
Additionally, all chapters, except for the final ninth chapter, have appeared in economic journals. Thus, each chapter has already undergone steep individual vetting on its research quality and information. This also explains why each chapter has anywhere from 20 to 50 or more references at its end.
The work further provides an additional contrasting and provocative perspective: an emphasis on the beneficial and influential aspects of Japan’s colonialism on the developing economies of Korea and Taiwan. This positive emphasis on colonialism will, no doubt, not play as well in Korea, since the two nations have had totally different colonial background experiences.
Chapter 5, the final chapter in Part One, diverges from the Korea/Taiwan comparisons. It contrasts India’s colonial benefits under the UK with those of Taiwan, especially in light of each nation’s postwar economic development. Surprisingly and against expectations of size, Taiwan has fared the better of the two. This is attributed to Japan’s specific emphasis on health and education.
In Part Two, chapters six through eight examine the convergence of the economies of Korea, Taiwan and Japan. Here, both Korea and Taiwan are held as role models for successful development.
Still, while these chapters focus on the development of countries in the Asian Miracle from the 1970s up until the 1997 recession, the authors also have a word of caution. Any development no matter how good has its limits as the recession brought out. Nothing is guaranteed.
Nonetheless, it was after this period, that by 2010, Korea had pretty well caught up with Taiwan and both of course are seen gaining on Japan.
As in their earlier book on the Taiwan Miracle, Taiwan’s “outstanding economic performance and catching-up process” in GDP is often the result of the “hardworking Taiwanese.” Their performance is “stellar and astonishing” in comparison with other countries in the region.
A key factor in Taiwan’s success is that it became the “Republic of Technology” and had the colonial base of an advanced country. One may be tempted to feel this is a natural bias, but any challenge must be done to the figures and charts provided to support such claims.
It is in the final chapter, that the question and role of China in Taiwan’s economic development is addressed. This key issue is one that is raised by three prepublication reviewers when they asked the inevitable: “Does Taiwan’s economy rely too much on China’s larger economy?”
The answer is that “for catching up in terms of GDP per capita, economic size may not matter.” However, this does not deny that China can be a very influential and powerful nation in the region.
As said, this work is highly technical and aspects of it may be more suited to those in the social sciences and economics. With its many charts and technical references, the authors even suggest it could be used as a text book or model for “writing research papers in regional development studies.”
Finally, every book risks being dated as soon as it comes out. So now one wonders whether the authors would reconsider any responses in lieu of the potential impact on Asian economies by US President Donald Trump imposing newly threatened tariffs. Or, would the passage of the Taiwan Travel Act positively or negatively impact economic matters in the region?
Regardless, the authors conclude with a final optimistic note: All data indicates not only that East Asia is still economically emerging but there also appears “no reason to discount the future possibility of an Asia-centered world economy.”
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
April 21 to April 27 Hsieh Er’s (謝娥) political fortunes were rising fast after she got out of jail and joined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in December 1945. Not only did she hold key positions in various committees, she was elected the only woman on the Taipei City Council and headed to Nanjing in 1946 as the sole Taiwanese female representative to the National Constituent Assembly. With the support of first lady Soong May-ling (宋美齡), she started the Taipei Women’s Association and Taiwan Provincial Women’s Association, where she
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,
RSS