November certainly wasn’t a quiet month on the election front, but for all the busy goings on Joey can’t help feeling none of it has added anything to the quality of the political debate. This must be the most vacuous election campaign in the history of the nation’s politics. More hot air has been expelled over the past few months than from an elephant’s rear end after an evening of curry and Taiwan Beer.
MA-XI MEETING
First there was the much-hyped meeting between President Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) and Chinese president Xi Jinping (習近平), which predictably turned out to be a damp squib — how could it not? The leaders of the two countries meet at a hotel for a cup of tea and a half-hour chinwag. Big wow.
Photo: Liu Hsin-de
No agreement was reached and the only thing they managed to sign was the check for the bill at the end — they “went Dutch,” which, says Ma, proves they met on an equal footing.
The only newsworthy bit of the event was Ma’s antics afterwards, when, literally drunk on the success of his longed-for meeting, he appeared to tell reporters on the plane that he counts himself as one of Xi’s “officials.” As Joey always says, the truth will always out after a glass or two of champagne, or as I like to call it, French truth serum.
CHU GOES TO WASHINGTON
Photo: Chu Pei-hsiung
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) presidential candidate Eric Chu (朱立倫) made a nuisance of himself in Washington in the middle of last month. Like a distant cousin forcing himself on his extended family for a week, Joey suspects the Americans were glad to see the back of him. Nothing much reported in the media, since it was all done behind closed doors. However, Joey has heard Eric’s team succeeded in thoroughly annoying his hosts with a constant stream of questions about the previous visit by Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) presidential candidate Tsai Ing-wen (蔡英文) in June.
Chu: Was Tsai served prosecco instead of champagne at the reception too?”
US official: Oh yes Mr. Chu, US government cut-backs I’m afraid.
Chu: I see… And was Tsai also given these spam and cheese twizzler canapes? You are giving us exactly the same treatment as Tsai aren’t you?
US official: Ahem! …Mr. Chu, have you tried the pretzels? Here. And tell me, where did you get that tie you’re wearing? I just love the color!
On his return to Taiwan, Chu’s party was anxious to demonstrate that the US clearly favors the KMT as the preferred governing party of Taiwan. The party seized on a remark made by former American Institute in Taiwan chairman Richard Bush, who said the US valued cross-strait developments under Ma’s administration and would like to see these continue. At a press conference following his words, KMT legislators predictably tried to spin Bush’s remarks. See! That proves it, they crowed, the US clearly supports Chu!
POLL CONFUSION
Stop the press! On Nov. 26 there was a collective raising of eyebrows when the KMT released a wonderfully fortuitous opinion poll that showed 29.2 percent of respondents support the party, while the DPP received 39.7 percent, narrowing Tsai’s lead to a mere 10.5 percent. Now, some people have accused the KMT of “massaging” the figures, something for which Joey could not possibly comment. However, it was unfortunate that two days later, the United Daily News (UDN) came out with a poll that showed 19 percent support for the KMT and 46 percent support for the DPP, numbers that were corroborated by a Liberty Times (the Taipei Times’ sister newspaper) poll. Another slick piece of work from the KMT propaganda machine.
CHU picks a RUNNING MATE
Last month, Chu finally selected his running mate for the election, Jennifer Wang (王如玄). Problem. The staff at KMT HQ clearly didn’t do enough vetting. The brown stuff duly hit the fan as the media started to delve into Wang’s financial background. Following days of intense media speculation, Wang made public a list of assets and properties under her and her husband’s names: together they own four plots of land, seven buildings and possess NT$28.59 million in savings. Rumors persist over past speculative sales of military housing units.
This is all rather unfortunate, since Wang and her hubby, not exactly short for cash, rent a taxpayer-funded government dormitory, provided at a highly-subsidized rent — allegedly NT$2,000 per month. It gets worse: irony of ironies, Wang’s husband is director of the Judicial Yuan Department of Government Ethics. You couldn’t make this stuff up.
Following a public outcry, Wang and her husband moved out of the dormitory. Cue a ludicrous, stage-managed photograph of Wang moving out of her apartment. Wang was snapped exiting the dormitory’s front door holding, with surprising ease and at a 45-degree tilt, what appeared to be an empty box. Wang was flanked by at least three officious-looking male minders dressed in matching white jackets, carrying absolutely nothing. Either the notion of gentlemanly conduct in Taiwan has taken a battering in recent years, or the staffers at KMT HQ take the public to be a bunch of fools.
THE MEDIA CIRCUS CONTINUES
With only a month-and-a-half to go until the election, all these KMT self-inflicted wounds have had the effect of almost completely removing the pressure from Tsai and her team. And so another month rolls by, the media circus around Chu and chums continues, and the public is still none the wiser what a future DPP government would look like.
Even worse, it now looks as if we won’t even get a presidential debate due to a disagreement between the parties over which TV station should play host — a situation from which the DPP, far ahead in the polls, stands to benefit. Will we ever see proper scrutiny, with each candidate grilled like a kipper over their policies, before the election? Joey despairs.
Chopped Suey, a satirical column published on the first Monday of every month, will comment on issues related to the forthcoming presidential and legislative elections to be held on Jan. 16, 2016.
June 23 to June 29 After capturing the walled city of Hsinchu on June 22, 1895, the Japanese hoped to quickly push south and seize control of Taiwan’s entire west coast — but their advance was stalled for more than a month. Not only did local Hakka fighters continue to cause them headaches, resistance forces even attempted to retake the city three times. “We had planned to occupy Anping (Tainan) and Takao (Kaohsiung) as soon as possible, but ever since we took Hsinchu, nearby bandits proclaiming to be ‘righteous people’ (義民) have been destroying train tracks and electrical cables, and gathering in villages
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
Swooping low over the banks of a Nile River tributary, an aid flight run by retired American military officers released a stream of food-stuffed sacks over a town emptied by fighting in South Sudan, a country wracked by conflict. Last week’s air drop was the latest in a controversial development — private contracting firms led by former US intelligence officers and military veterans delivering aid to some of the world’s deadliest conflict zones, in operations organized with governments that are combatants in the conflicts. The moves are roiling the global aid community, which warns of a more militarized, politicized and profit-seeking trend