Daisy Liu epitomizes China’s obsession with luxury brands: her shoes are Guiseppe Zanotti, her brooch Chanel, a floral Hermes scarf is stylishly knotted over one shoulder. She won’t, however, tote a monogrammed Louis Vuitton handbag ever again.
Wealthy shoppers like Liu are increasingly turning up their noses at labels they believe have been tainted by the common touch, seeking out understated, and exclusive, merchandise from the likes of Chanel or Hermes instead. That is becoming a big challenge for designers hoping to cash in on the world’s fastest growing luxury market.
“I have two Louis Vuitton handbags but I no longer carry them although they are still in fashion,” said Liu, a 31-year-old employee at a multinational cosmetics firm. “I don’t think the brand fits me any more.”
Photo: Bloomberg
More than a decade of strong economic growth has helped swell the disposable incomes of millions of Chinese, creating legions of men and women with a voracious appetite for status symbols regardless of the cost.
China’s importance for firms such as Louis Vuitton’s parent LVMH and Gucci’s PPR SA is indisputable: last year, as Europe was mired in financial crisis and the US economy faltered, Chinese shoppers spent an estimated US$18 billion on luxury goods, according to consultants Bain & Co.
China is the world’s third biggest market for personal luxury goods, worth at least US$25 billion. In the next three years, it is expected to leapfrog over Japan and the US to take the top spot, with the luxury segment expanding to US$28 billion.
As it grows, the market is also maturing, moving from so-called aspirational luxury, where bling is king, to what experts call absolute luxury: the desire to be seen as both wealthy and discerning.
“In the past, it was just a checklist. If you were one of the top five brands out of some magazine, you found that people in China just checked the checklist and bought according to the list,” said Vincent Liu, partner at Boston Consulting Group. “Going forward, people will be more selective. They know what and where and when to use what brands and products.”
For sophisticated consumers like Liu, that means purchases such as a US$2,000 Chanel mini bag and a Prada clutch. She’s also eyeing a coral lambskin bag from Bottega Veneta, the Italian fashion house renowned for its signature woven leather goods.
“The truly wealthy, the real millionaires, they will not want to buy LV Louis Vuitton or Gucci because they are too commonplace,” said Shaun Rein, managing director, China Market Research Group. “Rich people are getting richer and they want exclusiveness and more self-indulgence.”
OVER EXPOSED
China’s luxury market is poised to grow 18 to 20 percent this year, steeply outperforming the single-digit forecasts for Europe, the Americas and Japan, according to Bain, explaining the rapid expansion of larger luxury firms such as LVMH.
For years, LV’s Monogram “Speedy” tote, a dome-shaped classic favored by Audrey Hepburn, was one of the most desirable bags for Chinese women because it was a clear signal of having made it: the handbag costs double the US$400 an average Chinese worker earns a month.
The brand is LVMH’s cash cow and revenues are almost double those of Gucci, widely considered its closest competitor.
But as LVMH grew in China — there are currently about 38 Louis Vuitton stores there, including in remote areas such as the southern Guangxi autonomous region, compared to the 57 or so in Japan — it lost some of its cachet.
“In China, Louis Vuitton is seen as the brand that even your aiyi, or domestic helper, can afford,” said a retail consultant who declined to be named in order to be candid.
When asked to comment, LVMH told said it expected to “gain a brand new lead on the market” via a new store set to open next month in Shanghai’s swanky Plaza 66 mall. “The Plaza 66 will confirm Vuitton as the trendsetting brand in China,” the statement said.
Gucci did not immediately respond to requests for comment.
LV remains one of China’s most popular labels — a recent survey by strategists Digital Luxury Group put it at the top of web searches by consumers.
But brands such as Chanel and Hermes are catching up fast.
A recent study by consultants Bain shows twice as many Chinese now covet Hermes, creators of the iconic Birkin and Kelly handbags, and the brand is the third most likely to be purchased after Gucci and Louis Vuitton.
“Some prefer Hermes because our products are more subtle and not over exposed,” the brand’s China president, Leo Liu, said.
To attract shoppers, LVMH and other larger luxury brands are trying to strike the difficult balance between exclusivity and popularity to remain profitable.
LVMH is offering customers increasingly expensive and bespoke services to try to retain a mystique around the Louis Vuitton brand, whose creations are seen as being both too common and easily copied.
The company is also careful about rolling out new stores, aware that the brand would suffer from too much visibility.
Whether these strategies will convince savvy Chinese shoppers to carry their LV bags is unclear.
JUNE 30 to JULY 6 After being routed by the Japanese in the bloody battle of Baguashan (八卦山), Hsu Hsiang (徐驤) and a handful of surviving Hakka fighters sped toward Tainan. There, he would meet with Liu Yung-fu (劉永福), leader of the Black Flag Army who had assumed control of the resisting Republic of Formosa after its president and vice-president fled to China. Hsu, who had been fighting non-stop for over two months from Taoyuan to Changhua, was reportedly injured and exhausted. As the story goes, Liu advised that Hsu take shelter in China to recover and regroup, but Hsu steadfastly
On Sunday, President William Lai (賴清德) delivered a strategically brilliant speech. It was the first of his “Ten Lectures on National Unity,” (團結國家十講) focusing on the topic of “nation.” Though it has been eclipsed — much to the relief of the opposing Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) — by an ill-advised statement in the second speech of the series, the days following Lai’s first speech were illuminating on many fronts, both domestic and internationally, in highlighting the multi-layered success of Lai’s strategic move. “OF COURSE TAIWAN IS A COUNTRY” Never before has a Taiwanese president devoted an entire speech to
Small, fuzzy and baring sharp teeth, Chinese toymaker Pop Mart’s Labubu monster dolls have taken over the world, drawing excited crowds at international stores and adorning the handbags of celebrities such as Rihanna and Cher. Beijing-based Pop Mart is part of a rising tide of Chinese cultural exports gaining traction abroad, furry ambassadors of a “cool” China even in places associated more with negative public opinion of Beijing such as Europe and North America. Labubus, which typically sell for around US$40, are released in limited quantities and sold in “blind boxes,” meaning buyers don’t know the exact model they will receive. The dolls
Focus Taiwan reported last week that government figures showed unemployment in Taiwan is at historic lows: “The local unemployment rate fell 0.02 percentage points from a month earlier to 3.30 percent in May, the lowest level for the month in 25 years.” Historical lows in joblessness occurred earlier this year as well. The context? Labor shortages. The National Development Council (NDC) expects that Taiwan will be short 400,000 workers by 2030, now just five years away. The depth of the labor crisis is masked by the hundreds of thousands of migrant workers which the economy absolutely depends on, and the
RSS