Focus Taiwan reported last week that government figures showed unemployment in Taiwan is at historic lows: “The local unemployment rate fell 0.02 percentage points from a month earlier to 3.30 percent in May, the lowest level for the month in 25 years.” Historical lows in joblessness occurred earlier this year as well.
The context? Labor shortages. The National Development Council (NDC) expects that Taiwan will be short 400,000 workers by 2030, now just five years away. The depth of the labor crisis is masked by the hundreds of thousands of migrant workers which the economy absolutely depends on, and the tens of thousands working illegally. Another 800,000 people have second jobs, according to a 2018 Public Television Service report, a figure that is likely higher now as wages continue to run behind inflation. Everywhere, small businesses have signs in the windows, begging for workers.
We are just lucky the government continues to protect Taiwan jobs by preventing foreigners with spousal visas from working legally.
Photo: CNA
DEMOGRAPHIC CRISIS
The labor shortage’s root cause is the demographic crisis, as the government frequently admits. Despite years of warning and government subsidy efforts, in April only 8,684 babies were born, followed by 8,433 last month, making for 17 straight months of population decline and falling birth rates. Total births should be below 100,000 births this year — just 50,000 boys for the army in 2043.
The nation’s Total Fertility Rate (TFR) is likely to become the lowest in the world this year. Taiwan is frequently described as a vibrant democracy, but in truth we are living in a pleasant twilight, one rapidly becoming a deathwatch.
Photo courtesy of Kaohsiung City Government Labor Affairs Bureau
Meanwhile, the two major parties, the media and the public are riveted on the legislative recalls. The China-aligned parties decided upon gaining power that good public policy meant destroying governance and impeding defense, while the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) naturally responded to that. Nothing is being done about the two crises that really matter: the demographic crisis and the climate crisis. Even if the DPP recaptures the legislature, nothing will be done about these long-term perils. Instead, the focus in the fall will be on the elections for the seats of recalled legislators, the effects of the Trump tariffs, due to kick in next month when the 90 day stay of execution expires, and whatever the news cycle decides is interesting.
The current prediction is that sometime around the late 2050s, 40 percent of the population will be over 65. At present, the figure is over 20 percent. The babies born now, coming of age in the 2040s, will be supporting four or five seniors each during their working years. Such an economy is obviously untenable. Long before that, seeing this future, Taiwan’s young people will simply leave.
TALENT EXODUS
Photo: CNA
Thanks to low salaries, 104 Job Bank surveys already show over 90 percent of first-time job seekers would consider working abroad. Last June 104 Job Bank said that the proportion of workers struggling financially reached 40 percent, the highest ever.
Project that forward a decade or two: except for a tiny leavening of excellent jobs in finance and tech, and some government work, the vast majority of jobs will have little appeal and will be begging for workers. Talented people, especially those with English skills, will leave.
Recall that Taiwan is surrounded by economies that are also begging for people. Not just the East Asian miracle economies, but Thailand and Malaysia also import workers, at present for low-end jobs like construction and food processing. That demand will change: TFR in Thailand was 0.9 last year and is still falling.
Many of my university students in the late 2000s went to Singapore to work in service and government jobs. Even the Philippines will likely need to import workers too if salaries rise. At the moment it is in a nice demographic bump, but in a decade or two it will also need people. Same with Vietnam, which saw record low birth rates in last year — its TFR is a relatively robust 1.91, but it is following the same curve.
Hence, a young person growing into this period of demographic collapse across Asia in the 2030s and 2040s will likely have many good jobs to choose from, in exotic and interesting locales a short plane ride away, all with an identical overburden of old people, likely sedate and safe. In many of them housing is far more affordable, and the cost of living lower. Recall that rent is skyrocketing in Taiwan, following the housing price rises and Central Bank interest rate hikes.
Asia is already the preferred outbound destination for Taiwanese. Indonesia, Vietnam, Brunei, Thailand, Malaysia and Singapore already host significant Taiwanese populations. That is a list of nice places to live, with excellent food, good access to leisure and travel, great weather, and decent housing choices.
HOW CAN TAIWAN COMPETE?
How can Taiwan compete with them? The answers are obvious, and involve many of the same wrenching changes to the work culture and political economy that could be used to address the underlying demographic crisis: much higher salaries, remote work, walkable cities with cheap public transportation, shorter work hours, affordable health care, realistic labor insurance schemes, flex time, clean air, plentiful leisure activities that are close to nature, and so on. All things that would be good to do in and of themselves, never mind as part of utilitarian policy to retain labor. Without these changes, talented young people are not going to relocate to Taiwan, nor stay long if they do.
But first, Taiwanese officials have to imagine that Taiwan is in a global competition for a rapidly shrinking regional pool of young workers, and the nation’s leadership refuses to do that. The labor component of the New Southbound Policy focuses on bringing in talent from the nations to the south and on Taiwanese working in the area as officials of investing firms or in tech exchanges, but does not consider that Taiwan might shortly be exporting its own young to those nations.
Taiwan’s leadership does not appear to consider the flip side of their racist rejection of a rational immigration policy: no immigration inevitably means out-migration. As the population falls, everyone will see that the nation has no future, and people young enough to sell their labor elsewhere will leave.
How much longer can this pleasant twilight linger?
Notes from Central Taiwan is a column written by long-term resident Michael Turton, who provides incisive commentary informed by three decades of living in and writing about his adoptive country. The views expressed here are his own.
There is no politician today more colorful than Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) legislator Hsu Chiao-hsin (徐巧芯). The recall vote against her on July 26 will test the limits of her unique style, making it one of the most fascinating to watch. Taiwan has a long history of larger-than-life, controversial and theatrical politicians. As far back as 1988, lawmaker Chu Kao-cheng (朱高正) was the first to brawl and — legend has it — was the first to use the most foul Taiwanese Hokkien curse on the floor of the legislature. Current Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) lawmaker Wang Shih-chien (王世堅) has become famous
Crop damage from Typhoon Danas “had covered 9,822 hectares of farmland, more than 1.5 percent of Taiwan’s arable land, with an average loss rate of 30 percent, equivalent to 2,977 hectares of total crop failure,” this paper reported on Thursday last week. Costs were expected to exceed NT$1 billion. The disaster triggered clashes in the legislature last week between members of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) and China-aligned lawmakers from the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP). DPP caucus chief executive Rosalia Wu (吳思瑤) argued that opposition lawmakers should take responsibility for slashing the Ministry of Agriculture’s (MOA)
July 14 to July 20 When Lin Tzu-tzeng (林資曾) arrived in Sansia (三峽) in 1830, he found the local conditions ideal for indigo dyeing. Settlers had already planted indigo across the nearby hills, the area’s water was clean and low in minerals and the river offered direct transport to the bustling port of Bangka (艋舺, modern-day Wanhua District in Taipei). Lin hailed from Anxi (安溪) in Fujian Province, which was known for its dyeing traditions. He was well-versed in the craft, and became wealthy after opening the first dyeing workshop in town. Today, the sign for the Lin Mao Hsing (林茂興) Dye
Asked to define sex, most people will say it means penetration and anything else is just “foreplay,” says Kate Moyle, a psychosexual and relationship therapist, and author of The Science of Sex. “This pedestals intercourse as ‘real sex’ and other sexual acts as something done before penetration rather than as deserving credit in their own right,” she says. Lesbian, bisexual and gay people tend to have a broader definition. Sex education historically revolved around reproduction (therefore penetration), which is just one of hundreds of reasons people have sex. If you think of penetration as the sex you “should” be having, you might
RSS