It was a remarkably satisfying conclusion to the Potter franchise earlier this week at a 3D press screening at the Showtime Cinema on Linsen North Road in Taipei, but the excitement among the crowd of media and movie industry workers was considerably more muted than the very palpable anticipation of the much more massive crowds that were present for the first screening of Transformers: Dark of the Moon last month.
As has been pointed out more than once, those invested in the Harry Potter series will not want to miss this final installment, but given the serpentine intricacy of a plot developed over eight long feature films, those who aren’t probably couldn’t care less. The release in 3D for this last installment was an unnecessary piece of froufrou that was wholly inadequate to capture the interest of those whose only interest is in witnessing the latest cinematic spectacle.
So, disposing of the 3D issue, for anyone who has given the Harry Potter series any attention over the past decade, the finale has everything that one might hope for. It is conceived on an epic scale, and climbs on the shoulders of the more pedestrian and difficult Deathly Hallows: Part 1, drawing the story to a conclusion that is suffused with melancholy. Many characters who played major roles in previous films are given cameos, almost as if taking their curtain call, and many details of the plot are explained.
Photos courtesy of Warner Bros Entertainment
With its wealth of detail and picking up themes from many of the earlier installments, this final chapter is likely to get many people returning to the series to follow it through once again from the beginning.
The film is unabashed about leaving behind anyone who hasn’t boned up on their Harry Potter lore, diving into the complex endgame of the story with a minimum of preamble. This has been the policy of David Yates since he took over with the fifth Potter movie (Harry Potter and the Order of the Phoenix in 2007), and on the whole it has paid off, giving him more time to craft an appearance of depth and body to J.K. Rowling’s convoluted mythologizing. For newcomers, it makes the film all but incomprehensible. It must be said, that with its oodles of Gothic atmosphere, high melodrama and some clever effects, the film provides a visual feast that helps carry the audience along even when aspects of the narrative may be far from clear.
The three main characters, Daniel Radcliffe (Harry Potter), Rupert Grint (Ron Weasley), Emma Watson (Hermione Granger), for all the hype that surrounds them, have been given parts that are underwritten, and Potter’s charisma is not particularly evident in Radcliffe’s rather shuffling performance. There are, of course, the romantic resolutions, and the big kissing scene between Potter and Ginny Weasley (Bonnie Wright), and also that between Ron and Hermione, seem unearned and cheesy. Yates is better with the dark side of the conflict, and doesn’t shy away from showing the death of much-loved characters as the cost of victory.
Photos courtesy of Warner Bros Entertainment
A few cameos put the still immature talent of the stars in a startling and not particularly welcome perspective. An early scene with John Hurt as Ollivander, the maker of wizarding wands, provides some exposition about the importance of a certain magical artifact. It is a rather thankless role that Hurt manages with superb conviction, and even playing a shriveled old man, his screen presence overwhelms Radcliffe’s heroic efforts. It is splendid to see Maggie Smith letting her hair down as a re-invigorated professor Minerva McGonagall, but other fine actors, Ciaran Hinds and Kelly Macdonald in particular, are little better than extras.
Yates manages the pace of the film extremely well, and the denouement comes as a relief after the painful and sluggish buildup in Deathly Hallows: Part I. There are numerous loose ends, but this doesn’t matter all that much, for Yates has got fully to grips with the main points of the narrative, and barrels ahead, hardly leaving his audience time to catch breath. On the other hand, the set is full of little nuances that will keep Potter fans involved for repeated viewings, delighting in spotting some nice little detail here and there, and acknowledging that the director, for all his determination to bring the big show to a rousing close, has not ignored the finer points of the story.
Last week, Viola Zhou published a marvelous deep dive into the culture clash between Taiwanese boss mentality and American labor practices at the Taiwan Semiconductor (TSMC) plant in Arizona in Rest of World. “The American engineers complained of rigid, counterproductive hierarchies at the company,” while the Taiwanese said American workers aren’t dedicated. The article is a delight, but what it is depicting is the clash between a work culture that offers employee autonomy and at least nods at work-life balance, and one that runs on hierarchical discipline enforced by chickenshit. And it runs on chickenshit because chickenshit is a cultural
My previous column Donovan’s Deep Dives: The powerful political force that vanished from the English press on April 23 began with three paragraphs of what would be to most English-language readers today incomprehensible gibberish, but are very typical descriptions of Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) internal politics in the local Chinese-language press. After a quiet period in the early 2010s, the English press stopped writing about the DPP factions, the factions changed and eventually local English-language journalists could not reintroduce the subject without a long explanation on the context that would not fit easily in a typical news article. That previous
April 29 to May 5 One month before the Taipei-Keelung New Road (北基新路) was set to open, the news that US general Douglas MacArthur had died, reached Taiwan. The military leader saw Taiwan as an “unsinkable aircraft carrier” that was of huge strategic value to the US. He’d been a proponent of keeping it out of Chinese Communist Party (CCP) hands. Coupled with the fact that the US had funded more than 50 percent of the road’s construction costs, the authorities at the last minute renamed it the MacArthur Thruway (麥帥公路) for his “great contributions to the free world and deep
Years ago, I was thrilled when I came across a map online showing a fun weekend excursion: a long motorcycle ride into the mountains of Pingtung County (屏東) going almost up to the border with Taitung County (台東), followed by a short hike up to a mountain lake with the mysterious name of “Small Ghost Lake” (小鬼湖). I shared it with a more experienced hiking friend who then proceeded to laugh. Apparently, this road had been taken out by landslides long before and was never going to be fixed. Reaching the lake this way — or any way that would