Practically all the half million raccoons which infest the forests and parks of Central Europe are believed to descend from just four animals released in the woods near the German city of Kassel in the Nazi period.
Raccoons have never had a good press in Europe. Not only are they North American interlopers, there is also a persistent story that they were introduced to provide hunting pleasure for Marshal Hermann Goering, the head of Adolf Hitler’s Luftwaffe.
But a recent examination of the files, 75 years later, shows that the Nazi part of the story, which appears in many textbooks, is untrue.
Goering did not even know about the raccoons’ release, and the authorities in Berlin tried to stop their acclimatization.
But it was too late. Rangers at Lake Eder in Germany had already freed two breeding pairs on April 12, 1934. Not without difficulty either: the cautious animals would not initially come out from their box, despite being offered some eggs and dead squirrels.
But the hills around Kassel were to provide the freed raccoons with the perfect environment: lots of woods, rivers and food. The mammals grow up to 70cm in length and usually feed at night.
It is estimated a couple of dozen breeding pairs were established by 1945. Another 25 years on, there were 20,000. And the cute critters with the burglar-style black markings round the eyes kept on multiplying.
Kassel remains the capital city of raccoon expansionism in Europe.
“Round here, just about everyone’s garden has a raccoon living in it in summer-time,” said biologist Frank-Uwe Michler in the city. Genetic studies show that raccoons in Hamburg and Bavaria also descend from the same two Lake Eder pairs.
SKINS AND MEAT
Horst Marohn, of the state of Hesse forestry authority, says, “All the books claim that Goering personally ordered this rather foolhardy disturbance of our fauna.” But Marohn and senior ranger Eberhard Leicht checked the official files and found a different story.
As supervisor of hunting in the Voehl and Lake Eder areas, Leicht is the modern successor of the rangers who not only freed the raccoons but documented the whole matter in correspondence.
“It wasn’t just someone opening a cage to see what happened. It all had to be officially reviewed, even back then,” Leicht said. The proposal had apparently come from fur merchants, who suggested the animals would provide both skins and meat.
However Kassel had a particularly bureaucratic government, since it was part of the state of Prussia, and everything had to be approved in the capital, Berlin, by the office of Prussia’s master of the hunt.
BUREAUCRATIC INERTIA
Two of the Third Reich’s most senior animal-biology officials promptly objected.
One was Carl Hagenbeck, a zoologist whose family conducted one of Germany’s most famous zoos in Hamburg.Hagenbeck said he knew of a raccoon that had escaped in the city and constantly gobbled up city-dwelling pets including ducks and guinea pigs.
The other was Lutz Heck who ran the Berlin Zoo and who said releasing raccoons was not a good idea. The office of the Prussian master of the hunt vacillated for months before sending a veto to Kassel.
“But by that time, it was too late,” said Leicht. “A predecessor of mine, Baron Wilhelm Sittich von Berlepsch, had let the raccoons out.” The females were gestating and the foresters apparently thought it was best for the young to be born in the wild.
“It is true that Hermann Goering was in charge of the hunt office, but I am pretty sure he knew nothing about it,” said Leicht.
The name of the Nazi, who was a keen hunter, does not appear on any of the documents about the case.
Of course the facts have never stood in the way of a good story. Decades later, reports appeared in the British press that wryly described the animals as the “Nazi raccoons” and many Germans today see the release as another Nazi misdeed.
Heck’s and Hagenbeck’s concerns turned out to be right. Raccoons have become a pest in quite a few locations in Europe.
Leicht suggests raccoons are not all that bad though.
“Of course they can’t resist an egg if they find it. But they are not particularly talented predators, they can’t climb trees very well and often they are really quite clumsy. They are more gatherers than hunters. And it’s not true they were the Nazis’ pet,” he said.
Dissident artist Ai Weiwei’s (艾未未) famous return to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) has been overshadowed by the astonishing news of the latest arrests of senior military figures for “corruption,” but it is an interesting piece of news in its own right, though more for what Ai does not understand than for what he does. Ai simply lacks the reflective understanding that the loneliness and isolation he imagines are “European” are simply the joys of life as an expat. That goes both ways: “I love Taiwan!” say many still wet-behind-the-ears expats here, not realizing what they love is being an
Google unveiled an artificial intelligence tool Wednesday that its scientists said would help unravel the mysteries of the human genome — and could one day lead to new treatments for diseases. The deep learning model AlphaGenome was hailed by outside researchers as a “breakthrough” that would let scientists study and even simulate the roots of difficult-to-treat genetic diseases. While the first complete map of the human genome in 2003 “gave us the book of life, reading it remained a challenge,” Pushmeet Kohli, vice president of research at Google DeepMind, told journalists. “We have the text,” he said, which is a sequence of
Every now and then, even hardcore hikers like to sleep in, leave the heavy gear at home and just enjoy a relaxed half-day stroll in the mountains: no cold, no steep uphills, no pressure to walk a certain distance in a day. In the winter, the mild climate and lower elevations of the forests in Taiwan’s far south offer a number of easy escapes like this. A prime example is the river above Mudan Reservoir (牡丹水庫): with shallow water, gentle current, abundant wildlife and a complete lack of tourists, this walk is accessible to nearly everyone but still feels quite remote.
It’s a bold filmmaking choice to have a countdown clock on the screen for most of your movie. In the best-case scenario for a movie like Mercy, in which a Los Angeles detective has to prove his innocence to an artificial intelligence judge within said time limit, it heightens the tension. Who hasn’t gotten sweaty palms in, say, a Mission: Impossible movie when the bomb is ticking down and Tom Cruise still hasn’t cleared the building? Why not just extend it for the duration? Perhaps in a better movie it might have worked. Sadly in Mercy, it’s an ever-present reminder of just
RSS