the 'Saw' franchise for way
more than it was ever worth
Over the course of two sequels, the Saw franchise took a novel, if distasteful, idea and basically tortured it to death. While the clever, low-budget execution of the original's Darwinian premise - kill or be killed - commands a queasy respect, its creators, James Wan and Leigh Whannel, should have rejoiced in their unexpected success and moved on.
The marketplace, however, had other plans, spawning a host of imitators and now Saw IV, bloody proof that Jigsaw (Tobin Bell) may be dead, but his well of corporeal abuses has yet to run dry. Opening with an unwarranted shot of Jigsaw's genitals - laid out, like the rest of him, on a mortuary slab - the movie wastes no time plunging us into his autopsy.
"He's seen better days," mutters a technician, and I would have to agree.
PHOTOS:COURTESY OF CMC
Unfortunately, death is only a minor obstacle to Jigsaw, whose flayed stomach coughs up his trademark tape-recorded guide to dank dungeons and moldy motel rooms filled with elaborately trussed victims. Appearing frequently in flashback - as, Lord help us, an expectant father - Bell is more visible in this episode, mask-free and enjoying the opportunity to flex his thespian muscles.
Less enthusiastic, however, is the Gilmore Girls alumnus Scott Patterson, who, as the onetime proprietor of Luke's Diner and now a hapless FBI profiler, can only be wondering why his eatery ever had to close.
SAW IV
PHOTO: COURTESY OF CMC
DIRECTED BY: DARREN LYNN BOUSMAN
STARRING: TOBIN BELL (JIGSAW JOHN), COSTAS MANDYLOR (HOFFMAN), SCOTT PATTERSON (AGENT STRAHM), BETSY RUSSELL (JILL), LYRIQ BENT (RIGG), ATHENA KARKANIS (AGENT PEREZ)
RUNNING TIME: 95 MINUTES
TAIWAN RELEASE: TODAY
June 23 to June 29 After capturing the walled city of Hsinchu on June 22, 1895, the Japanese hoped to quickly push south and seize control of Taiwan’s entire west coast — but their advance was stalled for more than a month. Not only did local Hakka fighters continue to cause them headaches, resistance forces even attempted to retake the city three times. “We had planned to occupy Anping (Tainan) and Takao (Kaohsiung) as soon as possible, but ever since we took Hsinchu, nearby bandits proclaiming to be ‘righteous people’ (義民) have been destroying train tracks and electrical cables, and gathering in villages
Dr. Y. Tony Yang, Associate Dean of Health Policy and Population Science at George Washington University, argued last week in a piece for the Taipei Times about former president Ma Ying-jeou (馬英九) leading a student delegation to the People’s Republic of China (PRC) that, “The real question is not whether Ma’s visit helps or hurts Taiwan — it is why Taiwan lacks a sophisticated, multi-track approach to one of the most complex geopolitical relationships in the world” (“Ma’s Visit, DPP’s Blind Spot,” June 18, page 8). Yang contends that the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) has a blind spot: “By treating any
This year will go down in the history books. Taiwan faces enormous turmoil and uncertainty in the coming months. Which political parties are in a good position to handle big changes? All of the main parties are beset with challenges. Taking stock, this column examined the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) (“Huang Kuo-chang’s choking the life out of the TPP,” May 28, page 12), the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) (“Challenges amid choppy waters for the DPP,” June 14, page 12) and the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) (“KMT struggles to seize opportunities as ‘interesting times’ loom,” June 20, page 11). Times like these can
Swooping low over the banks of a Nile River tributary, an aid flight run by retired American military officers released a stream of food-stuffed sacks over a town emptied by fighting in South Sudan, a country wracked by conflict. Last week’s air drop was the latest in a controversial development — private contracting firms led by former US intelligence officers and military veterans delivering aid to some of the world’s deadliest conflict zones, in operations organized with governments that are combatants in the conflicts. The moves are roiling the global aid community, which warns of a more militarized, politicized and profit-seeking trend