Every weekend through the summer, big-budget movies compete for dominance at the box office.
On movie sets, a quieter sort of contest is taking place as a handful of companies are angling to have their digital movie cameras used to capture the action, supplanting the traditional 35-millimeter film camera.
Many of this summer's most prominent releases have relied on digital movie cameras, including Superman Returns from Warner Brothers, Click from Sony Pictures and Miami Vice, a Universal Pictures offering.
PHOTO: NY TIMES NEWS SERVICE
But while the changeover to digital filmmaking has long been predicted, these companies are encountering an unusual degree of resistance from producers, directors and cinematographers. A majority of feature films are still shot with film cameras and some well-known directors, including Steven Spielberg and M. Night Shyamalan, have been vocal about their intention to continue shooting on film.
“People involved with big-budget features are usually risk-averse,” said Marker Karahadian, the president of Plus8 Digital, a company in Burbank, California, that rents digital cameras. “Delays are very costly when you've got stars on the set, and that means no trailblazing.” Karahadian's company supplied six digital cameras made by Thomson Grass Valley for Miami Vice.
Unlike the market for consumer digital photography, the market for professional digital movie cameras is relatively small: The major US studios released only 194 films last year, according to the Motion Picture Association of America. And while Panavision and Thomson Grass Valley, both based in California, have an early edge, many new cameras are on the way, from established companies like the ARRI Group of Germany and a startup, Red Digital Cinema.
Digital cinematography first appeared as a faint spot on Hollywood's radar in 1999, when George Lucas announced his plan to shoot Star Wars: Episode 2 with a new kind of digital camera adapted from Sony Electronics' television news cameras. The Lucas experiment, released in 2002, persuaded a few directors to dabble with digital cameras, but it was not until this year that the roster of movies using digital photography began to grow.
“We've reached what may be looked at, five years from now, as a tipping point in the use of digital cameras,” said Curtis Clark, a cinematographer who is chairman of the American Society of Cinematographers' technology committee.
Manufacturers have promoted the potential cost savings of the new technology. Digital cameras eliminate the need to buy and develop film, and the need later to scan that film into a computer, add digital special effects or adjust the color. Robert Beitcher, Panavision's chief executive, estimates that even though renting his company's Genesis digital camera at a typical rate of about US$3,000 a day is nearly twice as expensive as renting a film camera, they can help save about US$600,000 on film costs and processing in a big-budget feature.
But producers and cinematographers say that cutting production budgets is not the main motivation for switching to digital moviemaking.
“It saves a little money, but that was not the driving force,” said Dean Devlin, the producer of Flyboys, a US$60 million World War I picture being released in September, which used the Genesis camera.
Rather, Devlin said the main advantage was the ability to shoot for nearly an hour during airborne dogfight sequences, with the camera mounted on a replica biplane or a helicopter and linked to a digital tape deck. Tony Bill, the movie's director, estimated that a film camera would have been limited to shooting takes perhaps five minutes long, before requiring a new load of film.
Others are gravitating toward the digital cameras because of their aesthetic qualities. Dion Beebe, the cinematographer for Miami Vice, said that he and the director, Michael Mann, chose a camera from Thomson Grass Valley called the Viper to create a particular look for the movie.
“We made use of the Viper's amazing depth of field,” Beebe said. “You're seeing clearly from 2 inches to infinity.”
But Beebe says that film cameras are still superior to their digital brethren for capturing bright sunlight in a more nuanced way, and other cinematographers acknowledge that digital cameras do not have the resolution found in film.
Dean Semler, who shot Click and Apocalypto, a Mayan historical adventure movie directed by Mel Gibson, said he was impressed by the Panavision camera's sensitivity in low-light situations when he was in the Mexican jungle. Some cinematographers may hold out for higher-resolution digital cameras, Semler said, but then added: “I'm looking at my images, and it doesn't matter. It looks fabulous on the screen to me.”
Still, executives at Panavision and Thomson Grass Valley are not expecting an abrupt fade-out for celluloid. The bulk of Panavision's US$233 million in 2005 revenue came from renting film cameras and accessories to movie and television producers. Panavision does not sell its cameras. (The company is controlled by the investor Ronald Perelman, who is in the midst of taking it private, Beitcher, the chief executive, said.)
“We've got 1,000 film cameras in our warehouse, and we expect to be renting them for a long time,” Beitcher said.
Thomson Grass Valley is a division of Thomson, the French-based media products and services company, and is a corporate sister to Technicolor, which develops film for motion pictures.
“It's not our job to push the market,” said Mark Chiolis, senior marketing manager for Thomson Grass Valley. “It's our job to provide tool sets for the market to select from. If you like the look of film, shoot film.”
Thomson Grass Valley and Panavision also face a cattle call of new digital movie cameras, some being sold for much lower prices.
Red Digital Cinema, founded by Jim Jannard, a billionaire who started the sunglasses company Oakley, is developing a higher-resolution digital camera that will sell for US$17,500.
“For the cost of a few days' rental of their products, you can own ours,” said Ted Schilowitz, a Red Digital executive.
June 9 to June 15 A photo of two men riding trendy high-wheel Penny-Farthing bicycles past a Qing Dynasty gate aptly captures the essence of Taipei in 1897 — a newly colonized city on the cusp of great change. The Japanese began making significant modifications to the cityscape in 1899, tearing down Qing-era structures, widening boulevards and installing Western-style infrastructure and buildings. The photographer, Minosuke Imamura, only spent a year in Taiwan as a cartographer for the governor-general’s office, but he left behind a treasure trove of 130 images showing life at the onset of Japanese rule, spanning July 1897 to
One of the most important gripes that Taiwanese have about the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) is that it has failed to deliver concretely on higher wages, housing prices and other bread-and-butter issues. The parallel complaint is that the DPP cares only about glamor issues, such as removing markers of Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) colonialism by renaming them, or what the KMT codes as “de-Sinification.” Once again, as a critical election looms, the DPP is presenting evidence for that charge. The KMT was quick to jump on the recent proposal of the Ministry of the Interior (MOI) to rename roads that symbolize
On the evening of June 1, Control Yuan Secretary-General Lee Chun-yi (李俊俋) apologized and resigned in disgrace. His crime was instructing his driver to use a Control Yuan vehicle to transport his dog to a pet grooming salon. The Control Yuan is the government branch that investigates, audits and impeaches government officials for, among other things, misuse of government funds, so his misuse of a government vehicle was highly inappropriate. If this story were told to anyone living in the golden era of swaggering gangsters, flashy nouveau riche businessmen, and corrupt “black gold” politics of the 1980s and 1990s, they would have laughed.
In an interview posted online by United Daily News (UDN) on May 26, current Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) was asked about Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) replacing him as party chair. Though not yet officially running, by the customs of Taiwan politics, Lu has been signalling she is both running for party chair and to be the party’s 2028 presidential candidate. She told an international media outlet that she was considering a run. She also gave a speech in Keelung on national priorities and foreign affairs. For details, see the May 23 edition of this column,
RSS