The Exorcism of Emily Rose, directed by Scott Derrickson from a script he wrote with Paul Harris Boardman, is a horror movie wrapped in a courtroom drama. A priest (Tom Wilkinson) is accused of negligent homicide because a young woman in his care has died after a failed exorcism. For the defense, we have Laura Linney, whose character, Erin Bruner, is an ambitious lawyer with somewhat better taste in liquor than in courtroom attire. For the prosecution, with gray at his temples and a neat little mustache riding his lip, there is Campbell Scott, whose character's steely patience eventually wears thin. "Your honor, I object," he exclaims, as every good courtroom-drama lawyer must. On what grounds? "Well, silliness, for one."
Sustained. But objecting to silliness in a horror movie is a bit unfair. The whole point of the genre -- the fun as well as the terror -- lies in the suspension of disbelief. The Exorcism of Emily Rose, however, goes a bit further. Announcing from the start that it is "based on a true story" (words guaranteed to scare most movie critics), it tries to nudge its audience toward a real-world condition of belief in the supernatural doings it depicts.
Though Derrickson deploys the usual techniques of scary-movie making with a reasonable degree of competence, he does so for unusually high stakes. This is not meant to be just another spooky story, but rather a matter of (eternal) life and death, a religious argument decked out with dark and stormy nights, yowling cats and low-rent creep show effects.
The tale is fairly simple, and curiously lacking in suspense. We know from the start that Emily (Jennifer Carpenter), a devout 19-year-old who grew up in a rattling clapboard house in the middle of an empty field, is dead. The details of her last months are filled in by Father Moore (Wilkinson), who is either haunted by what he has seen or else suffering from chronic gas pain.
Wilkinson, usually a strong and subtle actor, here gives us no clue as to Father Moore's state of mind. Carpenter's Emily is a blank slate scribbled upon by diabolical forces. Though she flails and howls gamely, she is no Linda Blair. Her head does not spin, nor does she vomit green bile. Still, she does perform some extreme yoga poses, eats a handful of bugs and caterwauls in several languages, helpfully subtitled.
This leaves Linney to bear the burden of the drama, which she does with characteristic grace. Erin pronounces herself an agnostic, but stopped clocks and other ominous portents push her from skepticism toward acceptance of her client's view. Father Moore insists that Emily was in the grip of the Devil's minions, even as the prosecution presents an array of expert witnesses arguing that she suffered from a medical rather than a spiritual condition. Erin, in turn, unearths an anthropologist (Shohreh Aghdashloo) who studies demonic possession and is studiously noncommittal as to whether it really exists.
The movie pretends to take the same tolerant, anything's-possible position. While not especially good -- judged strictly on its cinematic merits, it ranges from OK to god-awful -- it is still a fascinating cultural document in the age of intelligent design. Its point of view suggests an improbable alliance of postmodern relativism and absolute religious faith against the supposed tyranny of scientific empiricism, which is depicted as narrow and dogmatic.
The sincerity of a believer -- Father Moore, in this case -- is conflated with the plausibility of his beliefs. The doctors, meanwhile, seem so sure of themselves. But of course, the movie says, no one can ever be completely sure, and thus superstition becomes a matter of reasonable doubt. Meanwhile the clocks stop, the wind howls, and we are encouraged to believe -- or at least not to disbelieve -- our own eyes. Father Moore knows what he saw. So do I: propaganda disguised as entertainment.
June 2 to June 8 Taiwan’s woodcutters believe that if they see even one speck of red in their cooked rice, no matter how small, an accident is going to happen. Peng Chin-tian (彭錦田) swears that this has proven to be true at every stop during his decades-long career in the logging industry. Along with mining, timber harvesting was once considered the most dangerous profession in Taiwan. Not only were mishaps common during all stages of processing, it was difficult to transport the injured to get medical treatment. Many died during the arduous journey. Peng recounts some of his accidents in
“Why does Taiwan identity decline?”a group of researchers lead by University of Nevada political scientist Austin Wang (王宏恩) asked in a recent paper. After all, it is not difficult to explain the rise in Taiwanese identity after the early 1990s. But no model predicted its decline during the 2016-2018 period, they say. After testing various alternative explanations, Wang et al argue that the fall-off in Taiwanese identity during that period is related to voter hedging based on the performance of the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP). Since the DPP is perceived as the guardian of Taiwan identity, when it performs well,
The Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on May 18 held a rally in Taichung to mark the anniversary of President William Lai’s (賴清德) inauguration on May 20. The title of the rally could be loosely translated to “May 18 recall fraudulent goods” (518退貨ㄌㄨㄚˋ！). Unlike in English, where the terms are the same, “recall” (退貨) in this context refers to product recalls due to damaged, defective or fraudulent merchandise, not the political recalls (罷免) currently dominating the headlines. I attended the rally to determine if the impression was correct that the TPP under party Chairman Huang Kuo-Chang (黃國昌) had little of a
At Computex 2025, Nvidia CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) urged the government to subsidize AI. “All schools in Taiwan must integrate AI into their curricula,” he declared. A few months earlier, he said, “If I were a student today, I’d immediately start using tools like ChatGPT, Gemini Pro and Grok to learn, write and accelerate my thinking.” Huang sees the AI-bullet train leaving the station. And as one of its drivers, he’s worried about youth not getting on board — bad for their careers, and bad for his workforce. As a semiconductor supply-chain powerhouse and AI hub wannabe, Taiwan is seeing
RSS