The poets who came of age in the years before, during and after World War II were faced with a giant Freudian dilemma: How were they to come to terms with the
gigantic legacy of the preceding generation -- the great Modernists such as T.S. Eliot, Ezra Pound, Wallace Stevens and Hart Crane? How were they to absorb the lessons of those masters and yet discover original voices of their own? How were they to avoid being crushed by the weight, solemnity and critical reputation of their esteemed predecessors?
In his eloquent and astute new book, the critic Adam Kirsch looks at some prominent US members of that post-modernist era -- Robert Lowell, Elizabeth Bishop, John Berryman, Randall Jarrell, Delmore Schwartz and their slightly later cousin Sylvia Plath -- and examines how, in wrestling with the anxiety of influence, they helped redefine the boundaries of contemporary verse, pioneering a new level of autobiographical exposure while giving voice to a more informal sort of writing that expanded poetry's range of diction, tone and subject matter.
Most of the poets discussed in this volume began writing under the umbrella of modernism and the then-dominant school of "New Criticism," which enshrined the modernist dogma of impersonality, symbolism and obscurity, and its dense, allusive language.
In their early years, they tended to write poems that dutifully hewed to their mentors' strictures, but in time each tried, in his or her own way, to break free from the styles and subjects that modernism had deemed suitable.
"In Jarrell's dramatic monologues and Schwartz's family epic, Bishop's tense plainspokenness and Berryman's jagged comedy, the values of Modernism are tested, resisted, and transcended," Kirsch writes. "As Schwartz wrote in 1954, `What the [old] literary methods exclude from all but the privacy of the journal or the letter is brought to the surface and exposed to direct examination by the new method."
Kirsch, the book critic for the New York Sun, does a wonderfully nimble job of conveying each poet's individual achievement and the evolution of his or her style, as apprenticeship gave way to maturity, as new techniques and language were invented to accommodate new ideas and material.
Writing in a manner that is at once erudite and accessible, Kirsch proves equally adept at dispensing the sort of close readings of individual poems championed by the New Critics and at explicating correspondences between a poet's life and art in a fashion that would have been anathema to the high modernists.
Like Martin Amis writing about novels, he writes about the poets in this volume as a fellow practitioner; his poetry collection The Thousand Wells won the 2002 New Criterion Poetry Prize. He uses his firsthand knowledge of the craft to make the hydraulics and verbal magic of a given poem thoroughly palpable to the reader.
In addition, his easy familiarity with the complete oeuvres of his subjects enables him to convey authoritatively -- and succinctly -- the arc of each writer's career, while revealing the hard-won knowledge (the underwater part of the iceberg, as it were) that lies beneath the innovations of later years.
In fact, it is one of Kirsch's central arguments that the "discipline, seriousness and technical sophistication" that these poets acquired during their modernist apprenticeships enabled them to produce poems about newly intimate subjects that possessed the rigor and shapeliness of lasting art -- poems that stand in sharp contrast to the outpourings of earnest but flabby "confessional" verse produced from the 1960s on, in the wake of Robert Lowell's epochal book Life Studies.
While that book's revelations of mental illness and familial strife opened the floodgates to poems about madness, marital grief and emotional dysfunction, he argues, Lowell's best work was not catalyzed by therapeutic or penitential motives, but by more purely aesthetic ends.
"What gives the poems of Life Studies their enduring value," Kirsch writes, "is not their honesty about Lowell's personal life, but their artistic form; the poet's experiences are not simply revealed but shaped through rhythm and symbol and tone, into works of art. Lowell could not have written poems like Waking in the Blue and Sailing Home From Rapallo without the formal mastery he acquired during his rigorous New Critical training."
Kirsch makes a similar argument about John Berryman's harrowingly intimate Dream Songs, the strongest of which did not so much transcribe his own traumatic experiences as transform and ironize them.
Because of the dramatic evolution of Lowell and Berryman's poetry (which moved from imitative Modernist formality to dramatic and vernacular self-exposure) and the comparative weight of their literary achievement, Kirsch's essays about them stand as the centerpiece of this volume.
Some of the other chapters in The Wounded Surgeon are decidedly less illuminating. The argument can be made that Elizabeth Bishop does not really belong in the group of writers Kirsch has selected: Her poetry, after all, was less explicitly autobiographical than that of the others and far more reliant on symbols. Sylvia Plath, too, seems like something of an anomaly in this literary constellation. She belongs to a younger generation, and the complex mythologizing dynamic between her life and work eludes the somewhat narrow and didactic analysis presented in these pages.
These, however, are quibbles. In The Wounded Surgeon, Kirsch has not only succeeded in communicating the achievement of six remarkable American poets, but in doing so, has also established himself as a poetry critic of the very first order.
May 11 to May 17 Traversing the southern slopes of the Yushan Range in 1931, Japanese naturalist Tadao Kano knew he was approaching the last swath of Taiwan still beyond colonial control. The “vast, unknown territory,” protected by the “fierce” Bunun headman Dahu Ali, was “filled with an utterly endless jungle that choked the mountains and valleys,” Kano wrote. He noted how the group had “refused to submit to the measures of our authorities and entrenched themselves deep in these mountains … living a free existence spent chasing deer in the morning and seeking serow in the evening,” even describing them as
As a different column was being written, the big news dropped that Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) caucus whip Fu Kun-chi (傅?萁) announced that negotiations within his caucus, with legislative speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) of the KMT, party Chair Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), Taichung Mayor Lu Shiow-yen (盧秀燕) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) Chair Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) had produced a compromise special military budget proposal. On Thursday morning, prior to meeting with Cheng over a lunch of beef noodles, Lu reiterated her support for a budget of NT$800 or NT$900 billion — but refused to comment after the meeting. Right after Fu’s
Yesterday, the Democratic Progressive Party (DPP) nominated legislator Puma Shen (沈伯洋) as their Taipei mayoral candidate, the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) put their stamp of approval on Wei Ping-cheng (魏平政) as their candidate for Changhua County commissioner and former legislator Tsai Pi-ru (蔡壁如) of the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) has begun the process to also run in Changhua, though she has not yet been formally nominated. All three news items are bizarre. The DPP has struggled with settling on a Taipei nominee. The only candidate who declared interest was Enoch Wu (吳怡農), but the party seemed determined to nominate anyone
What government project has expropriated the most land in Taiwan? According to local media reports, it is the Taoyuan Aerotropolis, eating 2,500 hectares of land in its first phase, with more to come. Forty thousand people are expected to be displaced by the project. Naturally that enormous land grab is generating powerful pushback. Last week Chen Chien-ho (陳健和), a local resident of Jhuwei Borough (竹圍) in Taoyuan City’s Dayuan District (大園) filed a petition for constitutional review of the project after losing his case at the Taipei Administrative Court. The Administrative Court found in favor of nine other local landowners, but