Like most sequels Shrek 2, which opens nationwide tomorrow, tries to compensate for potential lost novelty by taking everything people liked about the original and adding more. The prickly main characters, who since the first Shrek opened in 2001 have become cuddly plush toys, have returned: the grumpy title character (the voice of Mike Myers); his ogre princess bride, Fiona (Cameron Diaz); and of course the splendidly annoying Donkey (Eddie Murphy). The lessons that DreamWorks derived (and distorted) from William Steig's sublimely dyspeptic picture book are reiterated: be yourself; love yourself for who you are. For myself I accept Shrek 2 for what it is -- a slick and playful entertainment that remains carefully inoffensive beneath its veneer of bad manners -- but I don't really love it.
The filmmakers have added a passel of new supporting characters, movie star voices and satiric targets. Whereas Shrek mocked the world of Disney (the former realm of the DreamWorks honcho Jeffrey Katzenberg), the sequel, directed by Andrew Adamson, Kelly Asbury and Conrad Vernon, widens its scope to Hollywood as a whole, here done up in medieval
3-D cartoon drag as a place called Far Far Away.
PHOTO COURTESY OF BVI
It seems that Fiona is the estranged princess of this land of high-end boutiques whose names seem more like sly product placements than actual jokes. She decides to reconcile with her parents (Julie Andrews and John Cleese) and to introduce them to her new husband. (Their first family meal is a bit like Guess Who's Coming to Dinner, but with an ogre.) Donkey of course tags along, now that his relationship with Dragon has hit the skids, and they are soon mixed up with a wily super-agentlike Fairy Godmother (Jennifer Saunders), whose spoiled and loutish frat-boy son, Prince Charming (Rupert Everett), was once betrothed to Fiona.
To get Shrek out of the picture, the King hires Puss in Boots, a swashbuckling hit-cat with the voice of Antonio Banderas. Once the honorable cat comes over to Shrek's side, Donkey complains that there's room for only one annoying talking animal sidekick. And he does have a point, though Banderas's campy suavity and Puss' convincingly animated fur add some new looks and rhythms to the formula.
While this Shrek revives the raucous spirit and winking allusiveness of its predecessor, some elements of the animation have advanced noticeably. The settings, especially the interiors of castle rooms and dim taverns, are lighted more realistically than in Shrek, and the flesh and fur, in their various hues, have a more lifelike texture. All of this gives the picture more visual warmth and richness, but in comparison to the most recent Pixar movies it still looks cold and stiff. The human characters in particular look like cheap knockoffs of the toys in the Toy Story movies.
In terms of its attitude toward the audience, DreamWorks 3-D animation is in some ways the opposite of Pixar, choosing to divide its viewers by age rather than uniting them.
This kind of strategy is hardly uncommon in pop culture these days, and Shrek 2 executes it with wit and aplomb. The script, by Adamson, Joe Stillman, David Stem and David Weiss, has jokes that grown-ups and precocious kids will congratulate themselves for getting, and plenty of broader humor (which actually works better). The movie's goal is to enchant children with an old-fashioned fairy tale while simultaneously mocking and subverting its fairy-tale and nursery-rhyme premises. This is sometimes enjoyable and genuinely imaginative, but it also leaves a sour, cynical aftertaste.
In the March 9 edition of the Taipei Times a piece by Ninon Godefroy ran with the headine “The quiet, gentle rhythm of Taiwan.” It started with the line “Taiwan is a small, humble place. There is no Eiffel Tower, no pyramids — no singular attraction that draws the world’s attention.” I laughed out loud at that. This was out of no disrespect for the author or the piece, which made some interesting analogies and good points about how both Din Tai Fung’s and Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co’s (TSMC, 台積電) meticulous attention to detail and quality are not quite up to
April 21 to April 27 Hsieh Er’s (謝娥) political fortunes were rising fast after she got out of jail and joined the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) in December 1945. Not only did she hold key positions in various committees, she was elected the only woman on the Taipei City Council and headed to Nanjing in 1946 as the sole Taiwanese female representative to the National Constituent Assembly. With the support of first lady Soong May-ling (宋美齡), she started the Taipei Women’s Association and Taiwan Provincial Women’s Association, where she
Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairman Eric Chu (朱立倫) hatched a bold plan to charge forward and seize the initiative when he held a protest in front of the Taipei City Prosecutors’ Office. Though risky, because illegal, its success would help tackle at least six problems facing both himself and the KMT. What he did not see coming was Taipei Mayor Chiang Wan-an (將萬安) tripping him up out of the gate. In spite of Chu being the most consequential and successful KMT chairman since the early 2010s — arguably saving the party from financial ruin and restoring its electoral viability —
It is one of the more remarkable facts of Taiwan history that it was never occupied or claimed by any of the numerous kingdoms of southern China — Han or otherwise — that lay just across the water from it. None of their brilliant ministers ever discovered that Taiwan was a “core interest” of the state whose annexation was “inevitable.” As Paul Kua notes in an excellent monograph laying out how the Portuguese gave Taiwan the name “Formosa,” the first Europeans to express an interest in occupying Taiwan were the Spanish. Tonio Andrade in his seminal work, How Taiwan Became Chinese,
RSS