The Taipei First Girls’ High School (TFG) principal’s office has finally responded to a public backlash over recent controversial remarks made in an interview by Chinese literature teacher Alice Ou (區桂芝), who teaches at the school, including “reject all arms procurement” and “peace will come when Taiwanese acknowledge they are Chinese.”
However, the office’s response was extremely disappointing, as it sidestepped the core issue and exonerated Ou. It emphasized that she was interviewed by Taiwan’s Bang TV (玉山網路電視台) rather than a Chinese media outlet, as Ou faced a backlash for criticizing President William Lai (賴清德) in an interview with China Central Television (CCTV) last year. Yet the key issue is not the platform that Ou appeared on, but the substance of her remarks.
Her latest comments were made on a program hosted by retired air force lieutenant general Chang Yen-ting (張延廷), and the pro-China views she expressed were later republished by CCTV. However, TFG principal Chen Chih-yuan (陳智源) seemed to deliberately miss the forest for the trees, justifying Ou’s actions by saying that the interview was conducted by a Taiwan-based media outlet. This is frankly an insult to the intelligence of Taiwan’s public.
Knowing the law, but choosing not to apply it, is a form of self-degradation. The Teachers’ Act (教師法) could clearly be invoked here, but school authorities are acting as if nothing happened, shifting the responsibility by saying that they would “seek the legal opinion of the competent educational authority.” This is truly regrettable.
The letter itself acknowledged that Ou’s remarks have caused “significant public controversy” and “disruption to the school.” If that is the case, should there not be an investigation into the teacher involved? Where is the school affairs committee? What about the teacher evaluation committee? Article 32 of the Teachers’ Act says that teachers have a duty to “uphold the reputation of the educational institution.”
Additionally, Article 14 of the Teachers’ Act provides that if a teacher has acted in contravention of “any pertinent laws or regulations” and “the matter has been investigated and verified by the educational institution or the authorities concerned” and dismissal or permanent ineligibility are deemed necessary, then such measures could be imposed.
Has Ou’s conduct not damaged the school’s reputation? Has it not infringed upon “pertinent laws,” such as the National Security Act (國家安全法)? Should such a matter not be referred to the teacher evaluation committee for investigation?
Even if Chen does not to take the initiative to convene a meeting, Article 7 of the Regulations Governing Teaching Staff Evaluation Committees for High-schools and Further Education Institutions (高級中等以下學校教師評審委員會設置辦法) stipulates that the principal must convene a meeting within five days if more than half of all committee members jointly sign a request to do so. If the principal fails to do this, the signatory members may elect one person among themselves to convene the meeting instead. Therefore, as long as at least half of the committee members sign a petition, a meeting can be convened — rather than allowing the public’s concerns to be dismissed by a single letter from the principal. I sincerely hope that TFG’s teacher evaluation committee would step forward to uphold the professionalism and dignity of teachers.
TFG’s students are Taiwanese — born and raised in this country — yet Ou insists that they must all refer to themselves as Chinese, even claiming that once they do so, there would be no need to spend even a single dollar on arms procurements. Are Taiwanese Chinese? Is someone who speaks such blatant falsehoods and distorts the truth really fit to be a teacher? Do Ou’s remarks not contravene the Teachers’ Act? By echoing the talking points of a foreign hostile force, do her claims not also contravene the National Security Act? These are the issues that TFG should be “seeking clarification” on.
Yen Li-chen is a high-school teacher and a director of the Taiwan Teachers’ Union.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
From the Iran war and nuclear weapons to tariffs and artificial intelligence, the agenda for this week’s Beijing summit between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is packed. Xi would almost certainly bring up Taiwan, if only to demonstrate his inflexibility on the matter. However, no one needs to meet with Xi face-to-face to understand his stance. A visit to the National Museum of China in Beijing — in particular, the “Road to Rejuvenation” exhibition, which chronicles the rise and rule of the Chinese Communist Party — might be even more revealing. Xi took the members
The Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and the Taiwan People’s Party (TPP) on Friday used their legislative majority to push their version of a special defense budget bill to fund the purchase of US military equipment, with the combined spending capped at NT$780 billion (US$24.78 billion). The bill, which fell short of the Executive Yuan’s NT$1.25 trillion request, was passed by a 59-0 margin with 48 abstentions in the 113-seat legislature. KMT Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), who reportedly met with TPP Chairman Huang Kuo-chang (黃國昌) for a private meeting before holding a joint post-vote news conference, was said to have mobilized her
Before the Chinese Communist Party (CCP) and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA) can blockade, invade, and destroy the democracy on Taiwan, the CCP seeks to make the world an accomplice to Taiwan’s subjugation by harassing any government that confers any degree of marginal recognition, or defies the CCP’s “One China Principle” diktat that there is no free nation of Taiwan. For United States President Donald Trump’s upcoming May 14, 2026 visit to China, the CCP’s top wish has nothing to do with Trump’s ongoing dismantling of the CCP’s Axis of Evil. The CCP’s first demand is for Trump to cease US
As artificial intelligence (AI) becomes increasingly widespread in workplaces, some people stand to benefit from the technology while others face lower wages and fewer job opportunities. However, from a longer-term perspective, as AI is applied more extensively to business operations, the personnel issue is not just about changes in job opportunities, but also about a structural mismatch between skills and demand. This is precisely the most pressing issue in the current labor market. Tai Wei-chun (戴偉峻), director-general of the Institute of Artificial Intelligence Innovation at the Institute for Information Industry, said in a recent interview with the Chinese-language Liberty Times