Some news media have recently reported on a “plastic bag chaos,” citing online posts claiming that Japan and Australia both still provide free plastic bags, and questioning whether Taiwan’s plastic reduction policies are merely an excuse to charge consumers.
However, the issue is not whether breakfast purchases come with a plastic bag, but rather that the premise of these claims is fundamentally flawed.
All Japanese retailers have been required to charge for plastic bags since July 2020. Convenience stores and supermarkets commonly impose a fee, with the explicit goal of reducing single-use consumption. Australia’s approach is even more direct, as regions have outright banned single-use plastic bags, requiring consumers to either bring their own bag or pay for one.
Treating the thin produce bags in fresh food sections as representative of the entire system is not a valid comparison — it is taking one small detail and presenting it as the whole.
Once an incorrect example is used, the subsequent conclusions are bound to be skewed. The claim that plastic bags are free abroad while they are charged in Taiwan is not a real institutional difference, but a comparison built on a flawed understanding. The discussion was misdirected before it even began.
The “plastic bag chaos” is not an issue unique to Taiwan. It reflects broader disruptions across the global petrochemical and packaging supply chains. International reports indicate that the conflict in the Middle East has driven up the cost of petrochemical raw materials, affecting the supply of plastics and packaging materials.
South Korea has already experienced panic buying of trash bags and packaging materials, implementing purchase limits. In Japan, packaging material shortages have impacted some food production, and India has reported shortages in medical-grade plastic materials. At the same time, China’s Taiwan Affairs Office has said that Taiwan would no longer face plastic bag shortages after unification.
However, China’s own petrochemical sector is being similarly affected, with industries such as synthetic rubber potentially cutting output by as much as 30 percent and straining the entire petrochemical supply chain. All of these developments point to one underlying issue — the problem lies upstream, in raw materials and supply chains, not in any sudden, localized shortage of plastic bags.
Yet, in Taiwan, the narrative has been reduced to something else entirely. The issue is being directly attributed to government incompetence. Reducing a global supply chain disruption into the failure of a single area is not just an oversimplification, but a misdiagnosis of the problem itself.
Some are even interpreting Taiwan’s plastic reduction policies as a government excuse to collect money. In reality, the fees for plastic bags are collected by the individual retailers that sell them. Global supply fluctuations are one issue, and Taiwan’s plastic reduction policies are an entirely separate issue. Forcing the two together leads to a line of reasoning that ultimately leads to misguided conclusions.
Chang Shang-yang is a farmer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
In late January, Taiwan’s first indigenous submarine, the Hai Kun (海鯤, or Narwhal), completed its first submerged dive, reaching a depth of roughly 50m during trials in the waters off Kaohsiung. By March, it had managed a fifth dive, still well short of the deep-water and endurance tests required before the navy could accept the vessel. The original delivery deadline of November last year passed months ago. CSBC Corp, Taiwan, the lead contractor, now targets June and the Ministry of National Defense is levying daily penalties for every day the submarine remains unfinished. The Hai Kun was supposed to be
Reports about Elon Musk planning his own semiconductor fab have sparked anxiety, with some warning that Taiwan Semiconductor Manufacturing Co (TSMC) could lose key customers to vertical integration. A closer reading suggests a more measured conclusion: Musk is advancing a strategic vision of in-house chip manufacturing, but remains far from replacing the existing foundry ecosystem. For TSMC, the short-term impact is limited; the medium-term challenge lies in supply diversification and pricing pressure, only in the long term could it evolve into a structural threat. The clearest signal is Musk’s announcement that Tesla and SpaceX plan to develop a fab project dubbed “Terafab”
Most schoolchildren learn that the circumference of the Earth is about 40,000km. They do not learn that the global economy depends on just 160 of those kilometers. Blocking two narrow waterways — the Strait of Hormuz and the Taiwan Strait — could send the economy back in time, if not to the Stone Age that US President Donald Trump has been threatening to bomb Iran back to, then at least to the mid-20th century, before the Rolling Stones first hit the airwaves. Over the past month and a half, Iran has turned the Strait of Hormuz, which is about 39km wide at
The ongoing Middle East crisis has reinforced an uncomfortable truth for Taiwan: In an increasingly interconnected and volatile world, distant wars rarely remain distant. What began as a regional confrontation between the US, Israel and Iran has evolved into a strategic shock wave reverberating far beyond the Persian Gulf. For Taiwan, the consequences are immediate, material and deeply unsettling. From Taipei’s perspective, the conflict has exposed two vulnerabilities — Taiwan’s dependence on imported energy and the risks created when Washington’s military attention is diverted. Together, they offer a preview of the pressures Taiwan might increasingly face in an era of overlapping geopolitical
RSS