The 15-point framework plan for peace with Iran that US President Donald Trump has said is being discussed is based on a proposal put forward by his negotiating team during nuclear talks almost a year ago, diplomats with knowledge of the talks say.
That original 15-point plan was the basis for negotiations in late May last year, shortly before the talks collapsed due to Israeli airstrikes on Iran’s nuclear program.
There has been much speculation about what Trump’s latest claimed plan contains and how much of it has been updated from the now-outdated document the US presented to the Iranians last year.
Illustration: Mountain People
The fact that the plan mightlargely be a rehash of something that Iran did not accept a year ago suggests either a lack of US seriousness about the talks being planned for this week — or, more likely, a desire by Trump, for whatever reason, to pretend on Monday he had made more progress toward a deal than he had in reality.
The Iranians accused Trump on Monday of trying to calm the US markets before they opened by saying he was not going ahead with his threatened attack on Iran’s energy infrastructure. He said he was postponing the strikes for five days to give time to see if “15 points of agreement” could be reached.
Trump said “very good and productive” conversations had led to progress over the previous two days. Iran denied there had been any backchannel talks except for indirect discussions about reviving talks.
Some of the US’ 15 points drafted last year might be regarded as out of date since there have been three further rounds of talks this year, while Iran’s nuclear program — especially its key uranium enrichment sites — has been obliterated by US bombing.
Some diplomats close to the talks said they did not believe a radically different new US document existed, and even if the US was working on such a plan, it has not yet been shown to the Iranians, let alone secured their agreement.
Last year’s 15-point plan, described by the US as a term sheet, was put forward unilaterally by the US side and contained a large number of proposals that Iran would find difficult to accept, including restrictions on Iran’s use of money released by sanctions. The plan promised to end only nuclear-related sanctions, as opposed to all sanctions, including human rights sanctions.
The US proposed that money released from lifted sanctions could not be used to fund Iran’s ballistic missile program. The plan also proposed that all uranium stockpiles be shipped out of Iran immediately and down-blended to 3.67 percent.
All enrichment facilities would be made unusable within a month, and centrifuges would be rendered inoperable. The US would help fund a new Iranian civilian nuclear program, with a fuel farm outside Iran and subject to inspection by the UN watchdog.
A regional enrichment consortium would be established involving Iran, the US, the United Arab Emirates, Qatar and Saudi Arabia. The consortium could have an outside manager.
Iran, in any new talks probably overseen by Pakistan and held in Islamabad, would likely seek to focus discussions on some kind of hard-to-deliver commitment that the US would not launch further military attacks on Iran.
The issue of freedom of navigation along the Strait of Hormuz would have to be addressed by Iran. Gulf states will be looking for some kind of guarantees from Iran through a non-aggression pact.
As a result, any deal is likely to be even harder to strike than in previous US-Iran talks, since the number of issues has expanded well beyond Iran’s nuclear program — the chief focus of the 15-point plan. Pakistani Prime Minister Shehbaz Sharif on Tuesday confirmed the country’s offer to host talks, and there were hopes that US Vice President JD Vance would attend — a presence that would go some way to assuage Iran, since he is seen as a skeptic about the war.
The splits between the US and the rest of the G7 industrialized nations over the wisdom of launching the attack on Iran would be laid bare this week at a meeting of G7 foreign ministers in Paris.
Due to be attended by the US Secretary of State, Marco Rubio, the Iran war is scheduled to be discussed today at lunchtime — but France, Germany, Italy, the UK, Canada and Japan have all said they do not support what they regard as an unlawful and unnecessary war.
The six countries say they are acting to help defend Gulf allies, protect national interests in the region and promote freedom of navigation in the Strait of Hormuz — but that any intervention could only occur after a ceasefire.
Minister of Labor Hung Sun-han (洪申翰) on April 9 said that the first group of Indian workers could arrive as early as this year as part of a memorandum of understanding (MOU) between the Taipei Economic and Cultural Center in India and the India Taipei Association. Signed in February 2024, the MOU stipulates that Taipei would decide the number of migrant workers and which industries would employ them, while New Delhi would manage recruitment and training. Employment would be governed by the laws of both countries. Months after its signing, the two sides agreed that 1,000 migrant workers from India would
In recent weeks, Taiwan has witnessed a surge of public anxiety over the possible introduction of Indian migrant workers. What began as a policy signal from the Ministry of Labor quickly escalated into a broader controversy. Petitions gathered thousands of signatures within days, political figures issued strong warnings, and social media became saturated with concerns about public safety and social stability. At first glance, this appears to be a straightforward policy question: Should Taiwan introduce Indian migrant workers or not? However, this framing is misleading. The current debate is not fundamentally about India. It is about Taiwan’s labor system, its
Japan’s imminent easing of arms export rules has sparked strong interest from Warsaw to Manila, Reuters reporting found, as US President Donald Trump wavers on security commitments to allies, and the wars in Iran and Ukraine strain US weapons supplies. Japanese Prime Minister Sanae Takaichi’s ruling party approved the changes this week as she tries to invigorate the pacifist country’s military industrial base. Her government would formally adopt the new rules as soon as this month, three Japanese government officials told Reuters. Despite largely isolating itself from global arms markets since World War II, Japan spends enough on its own
On March 31, the South Korean Ministry of Foreign Affairs released declassified diplomatic records from 1995 that drew wide domestic media attention. One revelation stood out: North Korea had once raised the possibility of diplomatic relations with Taiwan. In a meeting with visiting Chinese officials in May 1995, as then-Chinese president Jiang Zemin (江澤民) prepared for a visit to South Korea, North Korean officials objected to Beijing’s growing ties with Seoul and raised Taiwan directly. According to the newly released records, North Korean officials asked why Pyongyang should refrain from developing relations with Taiwan while China and South Korea were expanding high-level
RSS