From 2022 to last year, traffic fine revenues from the six special municipalities have continued to rise, news reports said. Taoyuan saw the largest increase, with total revenues rising by approximately NT$2.6 billion (US$81.5 million). New Taipei collected a total of NT$3.65 million, Taipei NT$3.1 billion, Taichung NT$3.05 billion, Tainan NT$1.75 billion and Kaohsiung NT$2.5 billion. Traffic fines imposed in Taiwan exceed NT$30 billion annually.
Traffic fine revenues are distributed as follows: 75 percent of revenues are allocated to local governments, 24 percent to the issuing authorities and 1 percent to the national treasury. This flawed system reduces incentives for local governments to improve roads, lane markings and intersection designs and instead treats road users as income sources
If calculated based on Taiwan’s population of about 23 million, the average person incurs about NT$1,300 in traffic fines each year. Does such a large amount mean that Taiwanese are particularly prone to contravening traffic regulations? Probably not. Based on my more than 30 years of driving experience, most drivers do not intentionally break traffic laws — rather, the road environment often makes it hard to avoid. Even when a driver is careful and law-abiding, receiving a few tickets each year is not uncommon, let alone for young drivers, who are less experienced and constantly on the move.
The issue often lies not solely with people, but with road design. For example, after approaching an intersection, an inner lane might suddenly turn into a dedicated left-turn lane. If the driver cannot change lanes in time, they are forced to turn left and detour, or risk a ticket.
Similarly, when cars or motorcycles encounter a temporarily parked vehicle ahead on a two-lane road, briefly crossing into the adjacent lane to avoid it before returning to the original lane is often reported or flagged by automated enforcement systems as failing to stay in the designated lane. Motorcycles, in particular, frequently have to momentarily change lanes to avoid large vehicles and roadside obstructions and might be fined for failing to use their turn signal in time. Such situations indicate that many penalties actually stem from unreasonable road conditions.
Transportation authorities should review the system in four areas. First, focus on major traffic offenses while showing leniency on minor issues — strictly enforce penalties for drunk driving, drug-impaired driving, unlicensed driving, reckless driving, falsified license plates, noisy vehicles and double-parking. Second, for minor contraventions that do not endanger the safety of others, prioritize warnings over fines. Third, comprehensively improve unreasonable road markings, intersection design and speed limits. Fourth, review the public reporting system to prevent excessive or malicious reporting.
Finally, the issue of traffic fines being incorporated as a source of local government revenue should be reassessed. Issuing traffic tickets is not a business and should not be subject to annual growth targets like a company’s operating revenue. Otherwise, concerns should be raised about whether the government actually expects citizens to continue contravening regulations.
When local governments incorporate fines into their budgets, the pressure of enforcement is inevitably passed down to frontline police officers and various forms of automated enforcement, making drivers feel as though they are trapped in a maze of penalties. The central government has a responsibility to revise and reform this system so that traffic enforcement refocuses on maintaining safety and order.
Lin Chin-kuo is a sales manager.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
On March 22, 2023, at the close of their meeting in Moscow, media microphones were allowed to record Chinese Communist Party (CCP) dictator Xi Jinping (習近平) telling Russia’s dictator Vladimir Putin, “Right now there are changes — the likes of which we haven’t seen for 100 years — and we are the ones driving these changes together.” Widely read as Xi’s oath to create a China-Russia-dominated world order, it can be considered a high point for the China-Russia-Iran-North Korea (CRINK) informal alliance, which also included the dictatorships of Venezuela and Cuba. China enables and assists Russia’s war against Ukraine and North Korea’s
After thousands of Taiwanese fans poured into the Tokyo Dome to cheer for Taiwan’s national team in the World Baseball Classic’s (WBC) Pool C games, an image of food and drink waste left at the stadium said to have been left by Taiwanese fans began spreading on social media. The image sparked wide debate, only later to be revealed as an artificially generated image. The image caption claimed that “Taiwanese left trash everywhere after watching the game in Tokyo Dome,” and said that one of the “three bad habits” of Taiwanese is littering. However, a reporter from a Japanese media outlet
The Iran war has exposed a fundamental vulnerability in the global energy system. The escalating confrontation between Iran, Israel and the US has begun to shake international energy markets, largely because Iran is disrupting shipping through the Strait of Hormuz. This narrow waterway carries roughly one-third of the world’s seaborne oil, making it one of the most strategically sensitive energy corridors in the world. Even the possibility of disruption has triggered sharp volatility in global oil prices. The duration and scope of the conflict remain uncertain, with senior US officials offering contradictory signals about how long military operations might continue.
An article published in the Dec. 12, 1949, edition of the Central Daily News (中央日報) bore a headline with the intimidating phrase: “You Cannot Escape.” The article was about the execution of seven “communist spies,” some say on the basis of forced confessions, at the end of the 713 Penghu Incident. Those were different times, born of political paranoia shortly after the Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) relocated to Taiwan following defeat in China by the Chinese Communist Party (CCP). The phrase was a warning by the KMT regime to the local populace not to challenge its power or threaten national unity. The