When we watched the players of the Iranian women’s soccer team stand silently during the national anthem at the Women’s Asian Cup in Australia, it felt personal.
For many viewers, it was simply noted as a political gesture, but for Iranians watching around the world, that silence carried a message that was instantly understood. It felt like a handshake across distance, a quiet message delivered without slogans, without confrontation, without violence. A quiet signal between women who know what it means to live under a system where even the smallest act of autonomy can carry enormous consequences: disappearance, imprisonment or execution.
The players face another form of pressure: Some would remain in Australia on temporary humanitarian visas, but that choice is not without cost. For many, staying abroad could mean continuous pressure on their families by the regime; it could mean never returning home as long as this regime remains in power, cutting them off from everything familiar — not just the streets of their cities, but the rhythms of family life.
For those who return, the burdens are no less heavy. They might have elderly parents to care for, relatives who depend on them financially, or loved ones whose lives are directly threatened by the Iranian regime. Every choice is fraught, every path dangerous. The players were described as “wartime traitors” by a state-linked commentator, who called for them to be “dealt with more severely.”
For the players caught between these realities, the dilemma must be overwhelming. Whether they remain abroad or return home, the cost would be deeply personal.
To understand why this moment resonates so strongly, it is impossible to separate it from the wider story of Iranian women. What we saw on that soccer field did not appear suddenly. It is the result of decades of feminist struggle, most visibly expressed in 2022 in the “Woman, life, freedom” movement, in which dozens lost their lives simply standing up for basic human rights. Anti-regime protests have continued since then, with protests in January in response to the country’s economic crisis resulting in thousands of deaths.
The laws of the Islamic Republic of Iran impose structural discrimination against women, especially in the areas of family law and criminal law. Mandatory hijab, the right to divorce, custody and dowry, along with restrictions on employment and travel without the spouse’s permission, are among the main discriminatory laws.
Now the situation across Iran is worsening: As the US and Israel carry out strikes, the entire country lives under the shadow of war, as much as it has long lived under political repression. In this chaos, these athletes’ lives are caught between forces far beyond their control.
It is important not to romanticize what they are going through. Seeking refuge is rarely a triumphant moment. It comes with grief, uncertainty and the painful possibility of a long separation from home.
Yet even in this quiet, constrained act, there is something extraordinary. Iranian women have shown incredible courage and resilience. They have put themselves in danger and in difficult, even impossible positions, yet they do not stop fighting for what is right. On that soccer field, in that silence, they showed the world what it means to assert dignity, choice and humanity, even under threat, even in the shadow of war.
Shiva Mokri and Moones Mansoubi are members of the Hamava Collective, a volunteer group of Iranian Australian women in Sydney advocating for gender equality, women’s rights and family wellbeing.
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
In an op-ed published in Foreign Affairs on Tuesday, Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文) said that Taiwan should not have to choose between aligning with Beijing or Washington, and advocated for cooperation with Beijing under the so-called “1992 consensus” as a form of “strategic ambiguity.” However, Cheng has either misunderstood the geopolitical reality and chosen appeasement, or is trying to fool an international audience with her doublespeak; nonetheless, it risks sending the wrong message to Taiwan’s democratic allies and partners. Cheng stressed that “Taiwan does not have to choose,” as while Beijing and Washington compete, Taiwan is strongest when
US Secretary of the Treasury Scott Bessent and Chinese Vice Premier He Lifeng (何立峰) are expected to meet this month in Paris to prepare for a meeting between US President Donald Trump and Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平). According to media reports, the two sides would discuss issues such as the potential purchase of Boeing aircraft by China, increasing imports of US soybeans and the latest impacts of Trump’s reciprocal tariffs. However, recent US military action against Iran has added uncertainty to the Trump-Xi summit. Chinese Minister of Foreign Affairs Wang Yi (王毅) called the joint US-Israeli airstrikes and the