When we watched the players of the Iranian women’s soccer team stand silently during the national anthem at the Women’s Asian Cup in Australia, it felt personal.
For many viewers, it was simply noted as a political gesture, but for Iranians watching around the world, that silence carried a message that was instantly understood. It felt like a handshake across distance, a quiet message delivered without slogans, without confrontation, without violence. A quiet signal between women who know what it means to live under a system where even the smallest act of autonomy can carry enormous consequences: disappearance, imprisonment or execution.
The players face another form of pressure: Some would remain in Australia on temporary humanitarian visas, but that choice is not without cost. For many, staying abroad could mean continuous pressure on their families by the regime; it could mean never returning home as long as this regime remains in power, cutting them off from everything familiar — not just the streets of their cities, but the rhythms of family life.
For those who return, the burdens are no less heavy. They might have elderly parents to care for, relatives who depend on them financially, or loved ones whose lives are directly threatened by the Iranian regime. Every choice is fraught, every path dangerous. The players were described as “wartime traitors” by a state-linked commentator, who called for them to be “dealt with more severely.”
For the players caught between these realities, the dilemma must be overwhelming. Whether they remain abroad or return home, the cost would be deeply personal.
To understand why this moment resonates so strongly, it is impossible to separate it from the wider story of Iranian women. What we saw on that soccer field did not appear suddenly. It is the result of decades of feminist struggle, most visibly expressed in 2022 in the “Woman, life, freedom” movement, in which dozens lost their lives simply standing up for basic human rights. Anti-regime protests have continued since then, with protests in January in response to the country’s economic crisis resulting in thousands of deaths.
The laws of the Islamic Republic of Iran impose structural discrimination against women, especially in the areas of family law and criminal law. Mandatory hijab, the right to divorce, custody and dowry, along with restrictions on employment and travel without the spouse’s permission, are among the main discriminatory laws.
Now the situation across Iran is worsening: As the US and Israel carry out strikes, the entire country lives under the shadow of war, as much as it has long lived under political repression. In this chaos, these athletes’ lives are caught between forces far beyond their control.
It is important not to romanticize what they are going through. Seeking refuge is rarely a triumphant moment. It comes with grief, uncertainty and the painful possibility of a long separation from home.
Yet even in this quiet, constrained act, there is something extraordinary. Iranian women have shown incredible courage and resilience. They have put themselves in danger and in difficult, even impossible positions, yet they do not stop fighting for what is right. On that soccer field, in that silence, they showed the world what it means to assert dignity, choice and humanity, even under threat, even in the shadow of war.
Shiva Mokri and Moones Mansoubi are members of the Hamava Collective, a volunteer group of Iranian Australian women in Sydney advocating for gender equality, women’s rights and family wellbeing.
The White House’s decision to take a 9.9 percent stake in Intel Corp is looking like very shrewd business indeed. Since the government bought in at US$20.47 a share last August, the US chipmaker’s surging stock price has delivered the US a US$43 billion return. One of the reasons the investment has so far proved so sound is that the White House has made sure of it. According to The Wall Street Journal, Howard personally pushed deals on Intel’s behalf with some of the most lucrative clients imaginable. They include Nvidia Corp, the company at the heart of the AI
A single photograph can cut through a lot of noise, but it can also be used to misrepresent the truth. At the very least, it can concentrate the mind on something that requires further investigation. On Monday last week, Ma Ying-jeou Foundation CEO Tai Hsia-ling (戴遐齡) and former National Security Council secretary-general King Pu-tsung (金溥聰) held a news conference in which they showed a photograph of former foundation CEO Hsiao Hsu-tsen (蕭旭岑), now Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) deputy chairman. In the image Hsiao is seated next to Xiamen Taiwan Businessmen Association chairman Han Ying-huan (韓螢煥). The two men were holding
I first met Professor Ray Jiing (井迎瑞) as a film and documentary student at Shih Hsin University’s (SHU) Department of Radio Television and Film in 1988. The following year, he went on to become the director of the Chinese Taipei Film Archive — forerunner of the Taiwan Film and Audiovisual Institute (TFAI). Over his eight-year tenure, Jiing rescued and restored over 200 classic Taiwanese films. In 1997, he established the Graduate Institute of Studies in Documentary and Film Archiving at Tainan National University of the Arts (TNNUA), and I joined the program in his third cohort of students. Beyond a
A recent report concerning a student who is suing his teacher posed the question in its headline: Does failing a student in two subjects constitute bullying? The college student in Chiayi County apparently sought NT$2 million (US$63,603) in state compensation, but a court dismissed the case. The first reaction of many might have been to ask: What has happened to students nowadays? Some say that teachers have lost their authority, while others say students are overindulged. Some even start reminiscing over the days when “whatever the teacher says goes.” However, the real issue might be overlooked if emotional reactions like that are the