After the Ministry of Education amended the Regulations on the Dismissal, Non-renewal, Suspension or Layoff of Teachers at the Senior High School Level and Below (高級中等以下學校教師解聘不續聘停聘或資遣辦法), many conflicts that were originally minor incidents that could have been resolved within the school are being escalated to the level of official investigation, wasting limited educational resources.
In many cases, the issues are simple, such as a parent posting a critique on social media questioning a teacher’s disciplinary methods and filing a complaint to the school. Even if the school has gained an understanding of the incident and is satisfied that it does not involve major misconduct, as long as it is deemed “suspected of involving disciplinary actions under the teacher performance evaluation criteria,” the school is legally obligated to file a case for investigation.
To comply with legal procedures and avoid disputes, the school often needs to hire external experts and pay for investigation reports — each case costing over NT$50,000 covered through already tight educational budgets. Limited resources that could have been allocated to teaching, counseling or student support are instead redirected to administrative procedures for minor disputes.
From filing a case, gathering evidence, conducting interviews, supplementing documents to closing the case, it is common for an investigation to drag out for more than six months. The teachers involved might also be placed under unnecessary psychological stress. One school even held eight “school incident meetings” in just two months.
The new system is also changing teachers’ behavioral patterns. When every counseling session or student disciplinary action could be transformed into a high-cost, time-consuming investigation, teachers are forced to adopt less risky strategies, such as reducing the level of intervention, withdrawing teaching creativity and narrowing disciplinary standards. It is a case of “the more you do, the more mistakes you could make.”
This directly contradicts the educational objectives outlined in the Points to Note for Teachers about Student Counseling and Discipline (教師輔導與管教學生注意事項). The regulations expect teachers to guide students in developing good behavior, fostering self-discipline and maintaining classroom order. Yet, the new system forces teachers to take significant risks when trying to realize these goals. How many teachers can adhere to their educational ideals given the potential pitfalls? While young teachers are reluctant to devote themselves completely, senior teachers favor early retirement. The teaching force, as the most critical educational resource, is rapidly collapsing.
When a little friction can cost tens of thousands of New Taiwan dollars and six months of administrative drain, what is lost in today’s educational settings is not only efficiency but also the quality of education. The system should not deviate from the educational goals, and it should reserve room for schools’ professional judgment and flexiblity in handling minor incidents. Ultimately, the biggest danger is not to school budgets but to education itself.
Chen Pei-ying is secretary-general of the Chiayi County Teachers’ Union.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS