After the Ministry of Education amended the Regulations on the Dismissal, Non-renewal, Suspension or Layoff of Teachers at the Senior High School Level and Below (高級中等以下學校教師解聘不續聘停聘或資遣辦法), many conflicts that were originally minor incidents that could have been resolved within the school are being escalated to the level of official investigation, wasting limited educational resources.
In many cases, the issues are simple, such as a parent posting a critique on social media questioning a teacher’s disciplinary methods and filing a complaint to the school. Even if the school has gained an understanding of the incident and is satisfied that it does not involve major misconduct, as long as it is deemed “suspected of involving disciplinary actions under the teacher performance evaluation criteria,” the school is legally obligated to file a case for investigation.
To comply with legal procedures and avoid disputes, the school often needs to hire external experts and pay for investigation reports — each case costing over NT$50,000 covered through already tight educational budgets. Limited resources that could have been allocated to teaching, counseling or student support are instead redirected to administrative procedures for minor disputes.
From filing a case, gathering evidence, conducting interviews, supplementing documents to closing the case, it is common for an investigation to drag out for more than six months. The teachers involved might also be placed under unnecessary psychological stress. One school even held eight “school incident meetings” in just two months.
The new system is also changing teachers’ behavioral patterns. When every counseling session or student disciplinary action could be transformed into a high-cost, time-consuming investigation, teachers are forced to adopt less risky strategies, such as reducing the level of intervention, withdrawing teaching creativity and narrowing disciplinary standards. It is a case of “the more you do, the more mistakes you could make.”
This directly contradicts the educational objectives outlined in the Points to Note for Teachers about Student Counseling and Discipline (教師輔導與管教學生注意事項). The regulations expect teachers to guide students in developing good behavior, fostering self-discipline and maintaining classroom order. Yet, the new system forces teachers to take significant risks when trying to realize these goals. How many teachers can adhere to their educational ideals given the potential pitfalls? While young teachers are reluctant to devote themselves completely, senior teachers favor early retirement. The teaching force, as the most critical educational resource, is rapidly collapsing.
When a little friction can cost tens of thousands of New Taiwan dollars and six months of administrative drain, what is lost in today’s educational settings is not only efficiency but also the quality of education. The system should not deviate from the educational goals, and it should reserve room for schools’ professional judgment and flexiblity in handling minor incidents. Ultimately, the biggest danger is not to school budgets but to education itself.
Chen Pei-ying is secretary-general of the Chiayi County Teachers’ Union.
Translated by Eddy Chang
The conflict in the Middle East has been disrupting financial markets, raising concerns about rising inflationary pressures and global economic growth. One market that some investors are particularly worried about has not been heavily covered in the news: the private credit market. Even before the joint US-Israeli attacks on Iran on Feb. 28, global capital markets had faced growing structural pressure — the deteriorating funding conditions in the private credit market. The private credit market is where companies borrow funds directly from nonbank financial institutions such as asset management companies, insurance companies and private lending platforms. Its popularity has risen since
The Donald Trump administration’s approach to China broadly, and to cross-Strait relations in particular, remains a conundrum. The 2025 US National Security Strategy prioritized the defense of Taiwan in a way that surprised some observers of the Trump administration: “Deterring a conflict over Taiwan, ideally by preserving military overmatch, is a priority.” Two months later, Taiwan went entirely unmentioned in the US National Defense Strategy, as did military overmatch vis-a-vis China, giving renewed cause for concern. How to interpret these varying statements remains an open question. In both documents, the Indo-Pacific is listed as a second priority behind homeland defense and
Every analyst watching Iran’s succession crisis is asking who would replace supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei. Yet, the real question is whether China has learned enough from the Persian Gulf to survive a war over Taiwan. Beijing purchases roughly 90 percent of Iran’s exported crude — some 1.61 million barrels per day last year — and holds a US$400 billion, 25-year cooperation agreement binding it to Tehran’s stability. However, this is not simply the story of a patron protecting an investment. China has spent years engineering a sanctions-evasion architecture that was never really about Iran — it was about Taiwan. The
After “Operation Absolute Resolve” to capture former Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro, the US joined Israel on Saturday last week in launching “Operation Epic Fury” to remove Iranian supreme leader Ayatollah Ali Khamenei and his theocratic regime leadership team. The two blitzes are widely believed to be a prelude to US President Donald Trump changing the geopolitical landscape in the Indo-Pacific region, targeting China’s rise. In the National Security Strategic report released in December last year, the Trump administration made it clear that the US would focus on “restoring American pre-eminence in the Western hemisphere,” and “competing with China economically and militarily
RSS