In early December last year, Kenyan environmental activist Truphena Muthoni made history by hugging a tree for 72 hours straight. The goal was not only to raise awareness of the growing threats posed by climate change and deforestation, but also to highlight the limits of conventional advocacy in driving meaningful policy change.
Muthoni’s protest reflected a broader global shift. From climate strikes in Europe to student protests in Latin America, youth movements gained momentum last year, signaling a growing refusal among younger generations to accept incremental policy responses to systemic challenges.
Across Africa, Gen Z-led demonstrations last year transcended national borders and political systems. In Kenya, young people took to the streets following the death of a blogger and teacher in police custody; in Madagascar, frequent water and power outages sparked public unrest; and in Morocco, outrage centered on preventable maternal deaths during childbirth.
Crucially, these protests were not driven by isolated incidents, but rather by deep and persistent governance failures, with demonstrators calling for systemic responses to longstanding problems such as rising living costs, high youth unemployment, unreliable public services, and entrenched inequality. Far from fringe concerns, their demands were widely shared, which explains why labor unions and other influential players joined youth-led mobilizations in countries such as Madagascar.
Youth protests have, in effect, become proxies for broader public discontent. This raises two critical questions: Why have young people turned to protest as their primary means of political engagement? And under what conditions does protest translate into policy?
The protest wave of last year made clear that formal channels for youth engagement are failing. Although countries such as Kenya, Madagascar and Morocco have established national youth councils and other advisory bodies, young people’s political participation remains constrained by structural and systemic barriers.
Consequently, many young people feel unrepresented and unheard, eroding trust in public institutions. These perceptions are reinforced by capacity constraints, as young people often lack the skills, training and resources to navigate complex policy systems. At the same time, the leaderless nature of many contemporary protest movements excludes them from formal negotiations and decisionmaking processes.
Even so, last year’s youth protests influenced policymaking in three important ways.
First, widespread public outrage forced governments to reconsider existing priorities and confront issues that had long been sidelined, such as deaths during childbirth, corruption and limited access to digital technologies. Public commemoration of those who lost their lives to police violence also served as a warning that inaction could trigger renewed unrest.
Second, the protests underscored the profound disconnect between policy commitments and implementation, with demonstrators drawing attention to political corruption and misallocation of public funds. In Morocco, for example, public anger focused on heavy government investment in sporting facilities while essential social services such as health and education remained underfunded.
Third, the protests called attention to the real-world consequences of policy decisions. Disruptions to electricity and water supply offered a stark example: Poorer communities were particularly vulnerable, because most households lack viable alternatives to public services, while wealthier households and large firms could rely on private services. Youth activism has helped bring these inequalities into sharper focus.
Whether youth mobilization leads to lasting change depends on several factors. Non-violence is particularly important. When demonstrations turn violent, they risk losing legitimacy and public support. In fact, research consistently showed that peaceful movements are more likely to achieve their stated goals.
Moreover, while protest movements tend to focus on broad objectives, success often depends on articulating clear demands and winning the support of powerful actors. In Madagascar, for example, the protests gained traction when support from the military shifted the balance of power, intensifying pressure on political authorities and leading to the ouster of then-Madagascar president Andry Rajoelina.
Policymakers’ responses also play a decisive role in shaping outcomes. Rather than openly linking reforms to protesters’ demands, officials often acknowledge underlying issues while distancing themselves from the movements that brought those issues to national attention.
To be sure, young people’s limited understanding of how power and resources are distributed weakens their political influence. Despite their demographic weight and technological fluency, they often struggle to compete with entrenched interest groups or identify points of leverage.
If governments want young people to see policymaking as a credible alternative to protests, they must offer genuine opportunities to engage directly with decisionmakers. That engagement, in turn, needs to be accompanied by practical tools that help young people understand how policy is made and where leverage could be exercised. Morocco’s proposal to expand political participation among citizens younger 35 represents one promising model.
However, engagement must translate into tangible improvements in people’s lives. Increased investment in health and education, such as Morocco’s proposed 16 percent budget increase, should be paired with dedicated funding for youth-led initiatives, and reinforced by robust monitoring and evaluation mechanisms.
Lasting progress would also require comprehensive public sector reforms. A citizen-oriented approach, supported by a capable and accountable civil service, could improve service delivery, rebuild trust and reduce reliance on protest as the primary channel for political expression.
Policymakers should not dismiss youth protests as episodic disruptions, but rather recognize them as a form of collective feedback on governance failures. When formal participation channels break down, protest becomes the norm. Ignoring these signals risks deepening public distrust and stoking recurring unrest.
By contrast, governments that respond with genuine reforms, sustained dialogue and tangible improvements in service delivery could transform youth activism from a source of instability into a foundation for more inclusive and resilient governance.
Rose Ngugi is the former executive director of the Kenya Institute for Public Policy Research and Analysis.
Copyright: Project Syndicate
There is a modern roadway stretching from central Hargeisa, the capital of Somaliland in the Horn of Africa, to the partially recognized state’s Egal International Airport. Emblazoned on a gold plaque marking the road’s inauguration in July last year, just below the flags of Somaliland and the Republic of China (ROC), is the road’s official name: “Taiwan Avenue.” The first phase of construction of the upgraded road, with new sidewalks and a modern drainage system to reduce flooding, was 70 percent funded by Taipei, which contributed US$1.85 million. That is a relatively modest sum for the effect on international perception, and
At the end of last year, a diplomatic development with consequences reaching well beyond the regional level emerged. Israeli Prime Minister Benjamin Netanyahu declared Israel’s recognition of Somaliland as a sovereign state, paving the way for political, economic and strategic cooperation with the African nation. The diplomatic breakthrough yields, above all, substantial and tangible benefits for the two countries, enhancing Somaliland’s international posture, with a state prepared to champion its bid for broader legitimacy. With Israel’s support, Somaliland might also benefit from the expertise of Israeli companies in fields such as mineral exploration and water management, as underscored by Israeli Minister of
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) challenges and ignores the international rules-based order by violating Taiwanese airspace using a high-flying drone: This incident is a multi-layered challenge, including a lawfare challenge against the First Island Chain, the US, and the world. The People’s Liberation Army (PLA) defines lawfare as “controlling the enemy through the law or using the law to constrain the enemy.” Chen Yu-cheng (陳育正), an associate professor at the Graduate Institute of China Military Affairs Studies, at Taiwan’s Fu Hsing Kang College (National Defense University), argues the PLA uses lawfare to create a precedent and a new de facto legal
Chile has elected a new government that has the opportunity to take a fresh look at some key aspects of foreign economic policy, mainly a greater focus on Asia, including Taiwan. Still, in the great scheme of things, Chile is a small nation in Latin America, compared with giants such as Brazil and Mexico, or other major markets such as Colombia and Argentina. So why should Taiwan pay much attention to the new administration? Because the victory of Chilean president-elect Jose Antonio Kast, a right-of-center politician, can be seen as confirming that the continent is undergoing one of its periodic political shifts,
RSS