There is a modern roadway stretching from central Hargeisa, the capital of Somaliland in the Horn of Africa, to the partially recognized state’s Egal International Airport. Emblazoned on a gold plaque marking the road’s inauguration in July last year, just below the flags of Somaliland and the Republic of China (ROC), is the road’s official name: “Taiwan Avenue.”
The first phase of construction of the upgraded road, with new sidewalks and a modern drainage system to reduce flooding, was 70 percent funded by Taipei, which contributed US$1.85 million. That is a relatively modest sum for the effect on international perception, and reinforces the contrasts between Taiwan and China.
The plaque itself speaks volumes, in the wording, the adjacent flags, the message it conveys and the underlying policy behind the collaboration. Both Somaliland and Taiwan are self-governing states struggling to secure international recognition. Their mutual association and strengthening, albeit informal, of diplomatic ties, is one way to reinforce their attempt to find a solution to the predicament. That the name “Taiwan” was used instead of the “Republic of China,” especially when juxtaposed with the ROC flag, is a measure of the recognition that the ROC is Taiwan, and that it is not the People’s Republic of China. On a continent where Beijing is making diplomatic inroads into many nations with its Belt and Road Initiative, Taiwan’s collaborations and investment within Somaliland contrasts the Taiwanese model of seeking to provide benefit and development for locals compared with China’s largely self-serving model of investment in Africa.
An article published on July 17 by the Somaliland Standard news agency, “Taiwan and Somaliland inaugurate ‘Taiwan Avenue’ in Hargeisa, strengthening bilateral ties,” said the event was “part of a broader context of Taiwan’s diplomatic strategy in Africa, where it seeks to expand its influence and challenge dubbed China’s ‘One China’ policy.” That is part of a “unique relationship” with Taiwan, including the opening of representative offices in each other’s capitals, it said.
The representative offices use the official names “Taiwan” and the “Republic of Somaliland.” Despite the lack of formal diplomatic ties, the names reinforce the message of individual legitimacy.
Taiwan Representative to Somaliland Allen Lou (羅震華) has said that Taiwan’s model of cooperation is “people-centric” and focuses on “knowledge transfer and capacity building,” and that ultimately the hope is to create a model in Somaliland to “win more friends in east Africa.”
President William Lai (賴清德) met with Somaliland Minister of Foreign Affairs and International Cooperation Abdirahman Dahir Adam Bakal in July last year following the signing of an agreement between the nations on coast guard cooperation. Lai talked about the need to deepen bilateral ties and fulfill the strategic goal of a “non-red” Somaliland shoreline. He called Somaliland “the beacon of democracy in the Horn of Africa,” and that the “authoritarian bloc” continues to ramp up suppression of Taiwan’s and Somaliland’s international participation.
Taipei’s policy contrasts authoritarian states and democracies, and in particular those that are seeking legitimacy internationally. That these contrasts exist is further evidence that Taiwan and China are separate entities, with distinct governments, even if that is not reflected in international recognition.
On today’s page, analyst Michele Maresca (“Benefits of Israel’s pivot in Africa”) writes that Taiwan’s partnership with Somaliland has helped with the African nation’s aspirations to bolster international recognition. That was given a major boost by Israel’s formal recognition of Somaliland as an “independent and sovereign state” on Dec. 27 last year, making Israel the first UN member to do so. That recognition is a stepping stone in Somaliland’s bid for more international support: It not only provides broader legitimacy, but it now has a champion in Israel.
Soft power works slowly, sometimes imperceptibly, but over time lays the foundations for the evolution of circumstances by forming recognition of desired narratives. It is helped when the application of the soft power is implemented in good faith and for mutual benefit. Israel’s recognition of Somaliland was a significant boost to Hargeisa’s cause. Hopefully the application of soft power will continue to aid Taiwan’s.
The cancelation this week of President William Lai’s (賴清德) state visit to Eswatini, after the Seychelles, Madagascar and Mauritius revoked overflight permits under Chinese pressure, is one more measure of Taiwan’s shrinking executive diplomatic space. Another channel that deserves attention keeps growing while the first contracts. For several years now, Taipei has been one of Europe’s busiest legislative destinations. Where presidents and foreign ministers cannot land, parliamentarians do — and they do it in rising numbers. The Italian parliament opened the year with its largest bipartisan delegation to Taiwan to date: six Italian deputies and one senator, drawn from six
Recently, Taipei’s streets have been plagued by the bizarre sight of rats running rampant and the city government’s countermeasures have devolved into an anti-intellectual farce. The Taipei Parks and Street Lights Office has attempted to eradicate rats by filling their burrows with polyurethane foam, seeming to believe that rats could not simply dig another path out. Meanwhile, as the nation’s capital slowly deteriorates into a rat hive, the Taipei Department of Environmental Protection has proudly pointed to the increase in the number of poisoned rats reported in February and March as a sign of success. When confronted with public concerns over young
Taiwan and India are important partners, yet this reality is increasingly being overshadowed in current debates. At a time when Taiwan-India relations are at a crossroads, with clear potential for deeper engagement and cooperation, the labor agreement signed in February 2024 has become a source of friction. The proposal to bring in 1,000 migrant workers from India is already facing significant resistance, with a petition calling for its “indefinite suspension” garnering more than 40,000 signatures. What should have been a straightforward and practical step forward has instead become controversial. The agreement had the potential to serve as a milestone in
China has long given assurances that it would not interfere in free access to the global commons. As one Ministry of Defense spokesperson put it in 2024, “the Chinese side always respects the freedom of navigation and overflight entitled to countries under international law.” Although these reassurances have always been disingenuous, China’s recent actions display a blatant disregard for these principles. Countries that care about civilian air safety should take note. In April, President Lai Ching-te (賴清德) canceled a planned trip to Eswatini for the 40th anniversary of King Mswati III’s coronation and the 58th anniversary of bilateral diplomatic
RSS