An elderly mother and her daughter were found dead in Kaohsiung after having not been seen for several days, discovered only when a foul odor began to spread and drew neighbors’ attention. There have been many similar cases, but it is particularly troubling that some of the victims were excluded from the social welfare safety net because they did not meet eligibility criteria.
According to media reports, the middle-aged daughter had sought help from the local borough warden. Although the warden did step in, many services were unavailable without out-of-pocket payments due to issues with eligibility, leaving the warden’s hands tied.
When members of the middle class slip into the lower socioeconomic strata, they might be overlooked by social welfare agencies simply because they own a home or have children who are employed.
Although there was a son in their family working in Taipei, they had not been in contact for a month, and the circumstances of their situation remain unknown.
When the daughter sought help from the warden, she was likely already on the brink of falling apart. Each person possesses a different capacity for stress, and what you might regard as rational analysis might become a form of indifference — someone who knows how to swim might never understand how another could drown in shallow water.
Of course, government resources and social work personnel are limited, and it is nearly impossible to cover every single case. However, when you encounter someone in need on the street, do you first inquire about their family situation before deciding whether to help?
There were other possible approaches to this issue. For example, when the daughter sought help, the warden, a social worker or the police could have reached out to the son in Taipei or asked nearby neighbors to keep an eye on them. The warden could have also made regular calls to check-in. An even simpler option would have been to keep in touch with them through Line.
Even a small gesture can be enough to save a life. It costs no money and very little time, and it is something everyone is capable of doing. One day, as I was heading out to tend to my vegetables, an elderly woman who lived alone across the hall suddenly came knocking on my door. She said she was ill and needed to go to the hospital, but had lost her National Health Insurance card, and asked if I could accompany her to Taipei to apply for a replacement. Her voice was weak and she looked unwell, so I immediately dropped what I was doing and took the MRT with her to the National Health Insurance Administration office near Taipei Main Station. Her mental state was quite poor — she misplaced her EasyCard as soon as we exited the station and could not find it no matter how hard she tried. I told her not to dwell on it and that getting the health insurance card taken care of was the priority.
After everything was taken care of, I took her home to rest. She insisted on getting a new EasyCard and loading it with NT$500 to give to me, but I refused. After all, neighbors are supposed to help one another.
Before long-term care services were fully developed — before there were stair-climbing chairs — my mobility-impaired father relied on passersby or neighbors to help him up and down the stairs whenever he required medical care. Now, it is my turn to return the favor.
I later learned that, as well as having a daughter, the older woman across the hall actually also had a son — yet neither her daughter nor her son visited often.
By government standards, someone like her — who owns a home, has children and is still able to get around — would likely be excluded from long-term care services. Yet people like her make up the majority of society.
It might be precisely this gap in the social welfare system that causes many people who are in need of timely assistance to fall through the cracks. I hope the government and civil society organizations could adhere to the principle of providing urgent assistance, rather than means-testing poverty and immediately turning those seeking help away simply because they do not meet eligibility criteria. Long-term care qualifications might differ, but suffering does not distinguish between rich and poor.
If we all make an effort to empathize with those seeking help, without prejudice or discrimination, we might be able to prevent lonely deaths, deaths resulting from gaps in long-term care, or other such tragedies from occurring.
Jimmy Hsu is a farmer.
Translated by Kyra Gustavsen
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
RSS