On Sunday, I watched from my home in the US as a man in a red T-shirt clung to the side of my birth city’s most recognizable silhouette. Alex Honnold’s 91-minute, ropeless ascent of Taipei 101 was a global spectacle, but for those of us in the diaspora, it felt deeply personal.
With most of my family in Taiwan, seeing our skyline broadcast live was not just about athletic endurance. It was about how a landmark designed to withstand typhoons and earthquakes became a stage for a high-stakes gamble with mortality.
Taipei 101 was not designed for climbing. Its “dragons” — the steel overhangs representing good fortune — were architectural flourishes meant to be admired from street level. Yet, these features became the crux of Honnold’s ascent, demanding a level of creativity and brute strength that transformed ornamentation into a vertical obstacle course.
The question is: Why do millions want to watch a man who might fall? Psychologists suggest that “high-sensation seekers” such as Honnold possess a unique neurochemistry allowing for intense focus where others would panic.
However, that explains the climber, not the audience. They watch, because visceral awe is increasingly rare. Honnold himself suggested that such feats serve as a reminder that “time is finite” and should be used in the best way.
For 91 minutes, Taipei 101 was arguably the most-watched building on Earth. This visibility carries soft-power dividends, projecting an image of a city that is organized and confident enough to host a complex global production.
The building’s management reflects a cosmopolitan openness — a willingness to let a landmark be used in ways its designers never envisioned. However, awe and anxiety are two sides of the same coin. For many Taiwanese, pride in our home’s prominence coexists with a visceral concern: Is any spectacle worth the possibility of a live catastrophe?
This is where Taipei can lead the conversation on how urban adventure is regulated. The city’s response should go beyond counting views and use this as an educational tool. Honnold’s preparation — months of training and roped test climbs — illustrates the discipline behind the viral feat.
What children should learn is that nothing about it was improvised. It is important to emphasize discipline over daredevil mythologizing. Furthermore, this event serves as a stress test for people’s imagination. If a climber can turn a financial tower into a global storytelling platform, what else can Taiwanese do with their skyline? Can they use these icons for sustainability, public art or science in ways that do not hinge on the possibility of disaster?
As Honnold reached the summit, a child watching reportedly asked if the steel dragons would breathe fire. They did not, but for a few moments, a skyscraper became something more than glass and steel. It became a site of collective wonder at what one person can achieve with preparation and skill. Taipei 101 remains a stoic sentinel of the city’s skyline, but we now know its dragons can be ridden, and that our cities are not just places to live — they are mountains to be climbed with care, respect and a bold sense of what is possible.
Y. Tony Yang is an endowed professor at George Washington University.
The Chinese Communist Party (CCP) has long been expansionist and contemptuous of international law. Under Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平), the CCP regime has become more despotic, coercive and punitive. As part of its strategy to annex Taiwan, Beijing has sought to erase the island democracy’s international identity by bribing countries to sever diplomatic ties with Taipei. One by one, China has peeled away Taiwan’s remaining diplomatic partners, leaving just 12 countries (mostly small developing states) and the Vatican recognizing Taiwan as a sovereign nation. Taiwan’s formal international space has shrunk dramatically. Yet even as Beijing has scored diplomatic successes, its overreach
After more than a year of review, the National Security Bureau on Monday said it has completed a sweeping declassification of political archives from the Martial Law period, transferring the full collection to the National Archives Administration under the National Development Council. The move marks another significant step in Taiwan’s long journey toward transitional justice. The newly opened files span the architecture of authoritarian control: internal security and loyalty investigations, intelligence and counterintelligence operations, exit and entry controls, overseas surveillance of Taiwan independence activists, and case materials related to sedition and rebellion charges. For academics of Taiwan’s White Terror era —
After 37 US lawmakers wrote to express concern over legislators’ stalling of critical budgets, Legislative Speaker Han Kuo-yu (韓國瑜) pledged to make the Executive Yuan’s proposed NT$1.25 trillion (US$39.7 billion) special defense budget a top priority for legislative review. On Tuesday, it was finally listed on the legislator’s plenary agenda for Friday next week. The special defense budget was proposed by President William Lai’s (賴清德) administration in November last year to enhance the nation’s defense capabilities against external threats from China. However, the legislature, dominated by the opposition Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) and Taiwan People’s Party (TPP), repeatedly blocked its review. The
In her article in Foreign Affairs, “A Perfect Storm for Taiwan in 2026?,” Yun Sun (孫韻), director of the China program at the Stimson Center in Washington, said that the US has grown indifferent to Taiwan, contending that, since it has long been the fear of US intervention — and the Chinese People’s Liberation Army’s (PLA) inability to prevail against US forces — that has deterred China from using force against Taiwan, this perceived indifference from the US could lead China to conclude that a window of opportunity for a Taiwan invasion has opened this year. Most notably, she observes that
RSS