US President Donald Trump last week stole the spotlight during the World Economic Forum in Davos, Switzerland, before artificial intelligence (AI) took center stage. Trump’s threats to impose tariffs on European allies over his ambitions to take Greenland triggered a sell-off in global equities. It was only after walking back the trade threats and ambitions to take Greenland by force that markets returned to calm and AI took over, with debate about the good and the bad the technology could unleash.
IMF managing director Kristalina Georgieva at a panel on the global economic outlook said an “AI tsunami” was hitting the labor market, and it would wipe out many entry-level jobs, mostly affecting young people.
As the technology becomes increasingly widespread, the demand for skills would undergo a significant transformation, she said, citing IMF data.
AI is likely to affect about 60 percent of jobs in advanced economies and 40 percent globally, Georgieva said, adding that some people stand to benefit from the technology, but others face lower wages and fewer job opportunities.
Georgieva urged employers to discuss the role of AI tools with employees before adopting their use in the workplace, especially as the technology rapidly advances.
Still, no one knows how to make it safe and inclusive, she said, adding that her biggest worry is the potential harm that unregulated, market-driven deployment of AI would create.
Dario Amodei — CEO of Anthropic, one of the world’s most powerful AI creators — also expressed concern about high unemployment and underemployment brought on by widespread AI use.
Nevertheless, he said he believes the good from the technology would outweigh the bad, Bloomberg News reported.
Amodei has long warned about AI’s effects on the job market. During an interview last year, he said the emerging technology could wipe out 50 percent of entry-level jobs across technology, finance, law, consulting and other clerical positions, leading to a “white-collar bloodbath.”
Yet, not every business executive speaking at Davos agreed that AI is destined to wreak havoc on the labor market. Nvidia Corp CEO Jensen Huang (黃仁勳) made a case for realistic optimism, based on the history of technological advancements.
The massive build-out of AI infrastructure would create swaths of blue-collar jobs, Huang said, adding that he expected great demand for skilled vocational workers such as electricians, plumbers and construction workers, along with a substantial income.
“You don’t need to have a PhD in computer science to do so,” Bloomberg News quoted him as saying.
Just as people’s responses to any developing technology in the past, there are mixed views on the impact of AI on the labor market. The emergence of new technologies generally has three effects on labor demand: displacement, productivity and reinstatement, academic studies have shown.
The displacement effect means that the emergence of new technologies would replace the existing workforce, reducing labor demand. According to the productivity effect, new technologies would increase manufacturers’ productivity and profit, prompting them to further expand their operations and thus increasing labor demand. Meanwhile, the reinstatement effect states that new technologies create new types of jobs and demands, and in those jobs, labor would have a comparative advantage over machines, which would boost labor demand.
For pessimists, the displacement effect of AI would be significant, while optimists believe that the productivity and reinstatement effects of the technology would be sufficient to offset the displacement effect.
AI could be viewed as a form of creative destruction, which transforms jobs, rather than eliminating them. Regardless, as the technology is evolving rapidly, its long-term effects on economic growth and employment remain to be seen.
Most importantly, policymakers and officials should start looking into the workforce changes AI could create, develop policies to address the issues, and inform and educate the public on how AI might change their lives, positively and negatively.
In late January, Taiwan’s first indigenous submarine, the Hai Kun (海鯤, or Narwhal), completed its first submerged dive, reaching a depth of roughly 50m during trials in the waters off Kaohsiung. By March, it had managed a fifth dive, still well short of the deep-water and endurance tests required before the navy could accept the vessel. The original delivery deadline of November last year passed months ago. CSBC Corp, Taiwan, the lead contractor, now targets June and the Ministry of National Defense is levying daily penalties for every day the submarine remains unfinished. The Hai Kun was supposed to be
What began on Feb. 28 as a military campaign against Iran quickly became the largest energy-supply disruption in modern times. Unlike the oil crises of the 1970s, which stemmed from producer-led embargoes, US President Donald Trump is the first leader in modern history to trigger a cascading global energy crisis through direct military action. In the process, Trump has also laid bare Taiwan’s strategic and economic fragilities, offering Beijing a real-time tutorial in how to exploit them. Repairing the damage to Persian Gulf oil and gas infrastructure could take years, suggesting that elevated energy prices are likely to persist. But the most
Most schoolchildren learn that the circumference of the Earth is about 40,000km. They do not learn that the global economy depends on just 160 of those kilometers. Blocking two narrow waterways — the Strait of Hormuz and the Taiwan Strait — could send the economy back in time, if not to the Stone Age that US President Donald Trump has been threatening to bomb Iran back to, then at least to the mid-20th century, before the Rolling Stones first hit the airwaves. Over the past month and a half, Iran has turned the Strait of Hormuz, which is about 39km wide at
The ongoing Middle East crisis has reinforced an uncomfortable truth for Taiwan: In an increasingly interconnected and volatile world, distant wars rarely remain distant. What began as a regional confrontation between the US, Israel and Iran has evolved into a strategic shock wave reverberating far beyond the Persian Gulf. For Taiwan, the consequences are immediate, material and deeply unsettling. From Taipei’s perspective, the conflict has exposed two vulnerabilities — Taiwan’s dependence on imported energy and the risks created when Washington’s military attention is diverted. Together, they offer a preview of the pressures Taiwan might increasingly face in an era of overlapping geopolitical
RSS