In 1979, US band Sister Sledge sang We Are Family.
Whether Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) is a fan of the four-sister group of the late disco era is unknown, but he echoed that sentiment in a New Year’s speech last week, extolling the concept of the state as a benevolent, loving and kind large family made of up of striving and dedicated smaller families.
We Are Family is a much-loved wedding floor-filler, but it is not exactly new. Similarly, the political concept of state as a family made up of families is not exactly groundbreaking — the family as a stabilizing influence on the state is a large part of Confucianism.
“When every small family is warm and thriving, China as the big family will prosper,” Xi said.
After outlining some big family achievements — such as the Tianwen-2 mission starting a new era of space exploration, new aircraft carriers, and Chinese progress in artificial intelligence and chip development — he turned to how the big family helps the small, such as in education, employment for young people and medical care for elderly people.
He described a symbiotic relationship between families in China doing well and the large, benevolent family of big government also doing well.
Xi has also included the concept of happiness in many of his recent speeches, saying that happiness of the people should be a top priority of the state. Xi appears to be offering a Jeffersonian life and happiness, but without liberty.
What about the happiness — and liberty — of the people across the Taiwan Strait? Are they in the family to which Xi is referring?
Presumably they are, as he regards Taiwan as a “province of China.”
That would make Taiwanese the black sheep, the prodigal sons and daughters ready to be welcomed back. The father threatens punishment — as evidenced by military exercises close to Taiwan — but is willing to stretch a welcoming hand on their return, along with a list of new house rules.
Since my arrival in Taiwan 25 years ago, I have witnessed the rise of a Taiwanese identity. Starting in the south of Taiwan around the turn of the millennium with the first Democratic Progressive Party administration, the identity is founded on an eclectic mix of geography, democracy and progressiveness. “I am Taiwanese” is proudly declared by most junior-high school students today. Is this just to be contrary to someone from China who says “I am Chinese”?
Has Taiwanese identity really solved the Chinese family conundrum?
Are the only Chinese those now living in China?
Most Taiwanese are ethnically Han Chinese and are literate in Mandarin in traditional characters (as opposed to the simplified script across the Strait). So, are they not also Chinese?
Entering this debate in October last year was Chinese Nationalist Party (KMT) Chairwoman Cheng Li-wun (鄭麗文), saying: “Let Taiwanese people proudly say I am Chinese.”
This, of course, started a lively debate in Taiwan. It was perhaps also not unnoticed across the Taiwan Strait. If Taiwanese are Chinese, then their small, striving families could be easily welcomed back into the big family.
Whether they would wish this to happen is another question.
The other question to consider in the “good neighbor” realpolitik created by what happened to deposed Venezuelan president Nicolas Maduro might be: Is anyone going to ask them at all?
Paul Bryan Anderson, a pseudonym, is a long-term resident of Taiwan, where he works as a teacher.
We are used to hearing that whenever something happens, it means Taiwan is about to fall to China. Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) cannot change the color of his socks without China experts claiming it means an invasion is imminent. So, it is no surprise that what happened in Venezuela over the weekend triggered the knee-jerk reaction of saying that Taiwan is next. That is not an opinion on whether US President Donald Trump was right to remove Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro the way he did or if it is good for Venezuela and the world. There are other, more qualified
This should be the year in which the democracies, especially those in East Asia, lose their fear of the Chinese Communist Party’s (CCP) “one China principle” plus its nuclear “Cognitive Warfare” coercion strategies, all designed to achieve hegemony without fighting. For 2025, stoking regional and global fear was a major goal for the CCP and its People’s Liberation Army (PLA), following on Mao Zedong’s (毛澤東) Little Red Book admonition, “We must be ruthless to our enemies; we must overpower and annihilate them.” But on Dec. 17, 2025, the Trump Administration demonstrated direct defiance of CCP terror with its record US$11.1 billion arms
The immediate response in Taiwan to the extraction of Venezuelan President Nicolas Maduro by the US over the weekend was to say that it was an example of violence by a major power against a smaller nation and that, as such, it gave Chinese President Xi Jinping (習近平) carte blanche to invade Taiwan. That assessment is vastly oversimplistic and, on more sober reflection, likely incorrect. Generally speaking, there are three basic interpretations from commentators in Taiwan. The first is that the US is no longer interested in what is happening beyond its own backyard, and no longer preoccupied with regions in other
As technological change sweeps across the world, the focus of education has undergone an inevitable shift toward artificial intelligence (AI) and digital learning. However, the HundrED Global Collection 2026 report has a message that Taiwanese society and education policymakers would do well to reflect on. In the age of AI, the scarcest resource in education is not advanced computing power, but people; and the most urgent global educational crisis is not technological backwardness, but teacher well-being and retention. Covering 52 countries, the report from HundrED, a Finnish nonprofit that reviews and compiles innovative solutions in education from around the world, highlights a
RSS